It's too bad there's no resto shaman indeed, but hey, no resto druid either. I bet nobody saw that one coming.
Then again that druid that only does 4k HPS could be pretty accurate to what a resto druid could heal.
Seriously..................... this thread sucks.
I'm not even taking the time to read and I'll just say this.
They went with whoever the hell they had, and beat it.
Next week they'll do it with other people, because not only do they can, it also does not matter one bit as long as you have most buffs.
They could have done it with a different composition and slightly weaker players, the raid they had there is not a minimum requirement AT ALL.
what?
.......?
anyways, now that BL is provided by other classes and that shamans have poor healing output and pretty low dps on mobile/add fights its not really surprising they r being replaced. in response to mana tide, apparently other healers mana regen is good enough to heal without it
Bring the class, not the player.
I would like to add that not only can mages cast bloodlust, but it's also cheaper on mana than the shaman version.
@OP Go read their official Paragon forums, they explain why they don't use shamans.
I am Dave ! Yognaught, and I have the balls!
Cause some people suck at playing warrior an don't top meters. If it works for them then good.
The 4K HPS was the tank. Leader of the pack is leat. Proper use of lacerate and pulverize gets your crit up nicely for extended periods. Also during phase where you are on pillars if they had enough interupts he might have been throwing someheals. And yes druid healers are viable for raids. They just didn't use one. The tanks OS is resto but he PVPs with it.