Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    Deleted
    An easy way to explain my views are (in simple terms, based on runescape)

    Melee > Range > Mage > Melee

    in an image it looks like a triangle

    I felt this system worked, and is how pvp should be in an mmo

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Skrunch View Post
    An easy way to explain my views are (in simple terms, based on runescape)

    Melee > Range > Mage > Melee

    in an image it looks like a triangle

    I felt this system worked, and is how pvp should be in an mmo
    It's more like (at least should be)
    skilled > not skilled
    I have enough of EA ruining great franchises and studios, forcing DRM and Origin on their games, releasing incomplete games only to sell day-1 DLCs or spill dozens of DLCs, and then saying it, and microtransactions, is what players want, stopping players from giving EA games poor reviews, as well as deflecting complaints with cheap PR tricks.

    I'm not going to buy any game by EA as long as they continue those practices.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Kangodo View Post
    One more thing, WW2 was imbalanced indeed! That's why the Germans stopped playing.
    If things are imbalanced, that means there will be a winner. WoW can't have a winner :P
    I hear they wiped on a wave defense fight. Not enough tanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Skrunch View Post
    Alfdor, i think you not getting what i am not saying, but i am not going to argue about it, as i dont wish to give anybody a reason to report me.
    Oh I get what you're saying, and classes will never all be on equal footing with every other class. It's impractical and illogical to have it be so. The entire point of team oriented PvP is to bring classes that are specialists in certain areas and cover eachothers' weak spots.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Skrunch View Post
    anyway, back on topic, the current system, isn't broken, broken applies when something doesn't work AT ALL,
    My car only works one in 10 times I try and use it, my computer maybe 1 in 20 times... I suppose I should be happy they both work.

    Again - FACT, the current system IS broken, if you don't acknowledge that - then I think your QQ is in the wrong forum.

    The question isn't if it is broken, the question is - how is it broken.

    Challenge Mode : Play WoW like my disability has me play:
    You will need two people, Brian MUST use the mouse for movement/looking and John MUST use the keyboard for casting, attacking, healing etc.
    Briand and John share the same goal, same intentions - but they can't talk to each other, however they can react to each other's in game activities.
    Now see how far Brian and John get in WoW.


  5. #25
    High Overlord Flummox's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Nethermine
    Posts
    197
    If I'm playing a game of chess with my friend (and subsequently losing, because I'm horrible at chess), we have the same amount of pieces on the board with which to play. If I had *just* one pawn and *just* two rooks, and he had the standard chess set-up, I'd get my ass kicked not because of player skill, but because of balance issues.

    In WoW, you don't want to get your ass handed to you by someone who can promptly place their face on their keyboard and roll around for a few minutes. You want things to be *as balanced* as they can be so after, when you own someone, you actually feel like you did something that required dexterity, coordination, quick-thinking, and on the fly adaptation.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Flummox View Post
    If I'm playing a game of chess with my friend (and subsequently losing, because I'm horrible at chess), we have the same amount of pieces on the board with which to play. If I had *just* one pawn and *just* two rooks, and he had the standard chess set-up, I'd get my ass kicked not because of player skill, but because of balance issues.

    In WoW, you don't want to get your ass handed to you by someone who can promptly place their face on their keyboard and roll around for a few minutes. You want things to be *as balanced* as they can be so after, when you own someone, you actually feel like you did something that required dexterity, coordination, quick-thinking, and on the fly adaptation.
    Chess is intended above all else to one one single person versus another. WoW PvP is not.

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Skrunch View Post
    having balanced classes would mean that the damage against players would be the same, meaning that in confrontation, you would draw each
    say for me you are a troll and are just trolling plssssss, if not...
    seriously you are the noobish i ever seen, you really think if the classes are perfectly balanced they will always draw?
    skill? gear? diferent playstyles of each class? this things dont say nothing to you? OMG /facepalm

    Amazing sign by Sokogeka

  8. #28
    High Overlord Flummox's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Nethermine
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by Alfador View Post
    Chess is intended above all else to one one single person versus another. WoW PvP is not.
    No less applicable to any other competition, team sport or one on one. Don't argue to argue.

  9. #29
    Mechagnome
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    735
    Yo dawg, I heard you like trolling so we put a troll post in your troll thread so you can troll while you troll!
    Never play leapfrog with a unicorn.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Skrunch View Post

    Heroic Difficulty: Do you not understand? the idea of heroics and epics are that they provide a challenge, and you EARN the epics, if you want easy gear, join a guild and get them to carry you through the dungeons.
    45 minute cues, multiple hour runs on some of the longer ones(like Deadmines)

    I am all for SHORT, and HARD dungeons, I think the Heroics are currently too large for their difficulty, let earning factor not be "Patience" or "Guild runs" but pure player skill.

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Flummox View Post
    No less applicable to any other competition, team sport or one on one. Don't argue to argue.
    Arguing to argue? No, arguing because your analogy is flawed to the point it is invalid? Yes. There is no application of that hilarious scenario to WoW. If you're going to defend your point, actually defend it. It's ill befitting to accuse others of arbitrarily being contrarian simply for undermining your logic. WoW PvP is not a 1v1 endgame of 2 equally equipped opponents. It was not meant to be, and there is no reason to make that comparison. Chess is not a "team sport" just because you have multiple pieces on the board. The notion that the two are worthy of comparison is, to be honest, almost farcical.
    Last edited by Alfador; 2011-02-07 at 06:38 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •