Bottom seven in franchise value from worst to less worse: St Louis, Phoenix, Columbus, Islanders, Carolina, Nashville, Florida. So two long existing franchises, two newer expansions, two horribly stupid relocations, and one not so recent expansion team. I'm sure that it isn't just complete coincidence all the original six teams are the top six most valuable, but that isn't the end of the story. Most of the low value teams are in bad markets. Not all expansion or relocations have been failures. Winnipeg moved from Atlanta and immediately moved way up the list to #20 and should go up from there. Minnesota is pretty great and not that old. San Jose is a smart organization. The value of the franchises comes down to basically intelligence and common sense. Does it make sense to expand to Minnesota or to Florida and expect a franchise to succeed? Does it make sense to relocate a team to Winnipeg or to Phoenix? The franchises that are typically low in value are low because of the stupidity of Gary Bettman's expansion and relocation projects or in the case of the Islanders due to having an arena that is literally falling apart and the team being meh for a long time.
---------- Post added 2012-11-28 at 05:35 PM ----------
The Riley Sheahan soon to be legendary arrest video:
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-pu...3446--nhl.html