Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarantism View Post
    You do realize that you are still following order of operations in any of those situations right?

    Edit: Knuffelbert, what I meant by different prioritization would be how you place parenthesis. For example (4*4)/(4/4)= 16, but 4*4/4/4 = (((4*4)/4)/4)= 1
    Okay, in that case never mind

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Dashield28 View Post
    How in the world is it 13? I am asking because you really had to have done some creative thinking to get 13.

    9-n^2 where n=2
    9-2^2 = 9 - 4 = 5

    How do you get 13?
    lol creative thinking

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Knuffelbert View Post
    Could you give an example? Because I can't think of one, multiplication before division should have exactly the same result as the other way around (left to right does not matter (once you "draw" the syntax tree of an equation it becomes apparent why this is)
    Multiplication First:
    48/2*12 = 48/24 = 2

    Division First:
    48/2*12 = 24*12 = 288

    Thus why Left-to-Right order standardization among operators of equal precedence is important.

  4. #44
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by apinksquash View Post
    Multiplication First:
    48/2*12 = 48/24 = 2

    Division First:
    48/2*12 = 24*12 = 288

    Thus why Left-to-Right order standardization among operators of equal precedence is important.
    You do understand that it is a fraction right?

    That's not 12 it's 1/12

  5. #45
    Scarab Lord Hraklea's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    4,801
    Thus why Left-to-Right order standardization among operators of equal precedence is important.
    That's why parenthesis are important =)
    48/(2*12) =/= (48/2)*12

    There's no "left to right" rule in math...

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarantism View Post
    I don't think being able to solve a simple algebraic equation in multiple ways is creative at all.
    But then you get to some higher level stuff where they require you to think backwards of what they taught you in high school, and you get stuck because you high school teacher just followed the textbook and taught you to simply follow the algorithms without thinking. Thinking is the key, not learning algorithms for solving problems.

  7. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by Ichiago View Post
    You do understand that it is a fraction right?

    That's not 12 it's 1/12
    Says who?
    That's exactly why standards are important and being clear when writing an equation is important.

    Assuming the problem is:
    48
    _____
    2 * 12

    Is wrong. There is no reason to assume implied parentheses around the (2*12).

    @Hraklea I agree, I'm a huge fan of parentheses. I was always taught in school to do left-to-right, but you're probably right not to assume that's a world-wide concept. Better safe than sorry is my motto
    Last edited by apinksquash; 2011-04-19 at 08:42 PM.

  8. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by apinksquash View Post
    Says who?
    That's exactly why standards are important and being clear when writing an equation is important.

    Assuming the problem is:
    48
    _____
    2 * 12

    Is wrong. There is no reason to assume implied parentheses around the (2*12).
    Yes, I was wrong in that regard. Math is beautiful, the lines are very clear. I always read it as a multiplication of a fraction (i.e. 48 * 1 over what comes after wards, thus I read it with implied parentheses, which is a big jump I admit. This jump is equivalent to left to right evaluation rule come to think of it)
    Last edited by Knuffelbert; 2011-04-19 at 08:45 PM.

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by haxartus View Post
    But then you get to some higher level stuff where they require you to think backwards of what they taught you in high school, and you get stuck because you high school teacher just followed the textbook and taught you to simply follow the algorithms without thinking.
    I'm currently taking real analysis and modern algebra. Not sure what higher level stuff you are talking about that requires backwards thinking that breaks order of operations. Maybe in graduate school, but that's why I asked for an example. I was somewhat looking for an example of this "high level stuff"

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarantism View Post
    I'm currently taking real analysis and modern algebra. Not sure what higher level stuff you are talking about that requires backwards thinking that breaks order of operations. Maybe in graduate school, but that's why I asked for an example. I was somewhat looking for an example of this "high level stuff"
    Grad school to the rescue: group theory can get fancy. It doesn't "break" order of operations, but you have a completely different kind of algebra, so you need different rules. edit: OK, you know that if you are taking modern algebra (which I will take to mean abtract algebra).

    @hax: I appreciate where you're going with the creativity bit, and I agree that following a formula does not lead to understanding, but I think it's odd that you are taking it out on order of operations. It is the standardized way of communicating math.
    Last edited by Auloria; 2011-04-19 at 10:41 PM.

  11. #51
    Pit Lord aztr0's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,350
    PEMDAS. Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction.

    If you have a hard time remembering the order. Just say:
    Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally
    if you don't have an Aunt named Sally
    Please Excuse My Dumb Ass Sister
    if you still can't remember it, then there's nothing else to do :x.

  12. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by Ichiago View Post
    Wait... you are talking about calculators? As in having some piece of junk doing the job for you?
    Yup. They come in handy for stuff like busywork mathematics, solving otherwise nigh-impossible integrals, graphing and loads of other stuff. The rest of your comments don't seem to give any particular insight.

    @Tarantism - The acceptance of whether or not there is an implied pair of brackets/parenthesis is the issue at hand for that particular problem. Writing this:

    48
    ______
    2(9+3)

    To mean this:

    48/2 * (9+3)

    Is a rather poor and very confusing way to do so. The thing is, textbooks, mathematicians and computer programs all write fractions this way at some point or another, and it's often intended that there are implied brackets/paranthesis. A lot of calculators and applets account for this and make the calculation as such, so they're not wrong in that sense, because they followed their order of operations correctly. That's why there's a lot of confusion on that particular subject. That's also why I didn't want to go further than just the required math for engineering. Past that it gets into all this theory stuff that confuses and pisses me off, heh.

  13. #53
    BODMAS
    B - Brackets (Parenthesis)
    O - Of
    D - Division
    M - Multiplication
    A - Addition
    S - Subtraction

    Try this.

    Math is a boon and learning is always fun if taken in the right spirit. Nowadays, children are very likely to avoid especially math. I don’t understand why they do so. Besides parents, online tutors are best persons to encourage students to give attention to such subjects. There are several online tutoring services available to help students across grades for a very nominal cost. Some of them specialize in STEM subjects, for instance, tutorteddy.com. Students with difficulties in math or science can try it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •