eh.
OS X is really easy to work with, if you want to change something in the system config there's usually a very large button for it that isn't hidden in 300 submenus, that being said my stationary is a PC with windows 7 and tbf I don't really see that big of a difference in using windows 7 or OS X on a day to day basis outside of system configuration where OS X really just blows win7 out of the water with stupidly easy configuration and auto-complete options.
windows 7 now comes with way more stable drivers thanks to microsoft signing each and everyone of them which puts microsoft on par with apple when it comes to drivers. no more praying your drivers do not quit on you
so all in all, if my grandparents were alive and I was buying them a computer, I'd definitely give them something with OS X as it's really all point and click if you want to configure something.
I'm really liking windows 7.
Depends on the OS. For example all x86 versions of Win7 bar starter have a limit of 4GB (starter has a 2GB limit). A couple of the Win Server2008 versions x86 have a limit of 64GB. OSX Snow Leopard has a hybrid kernel so it can recognise the same silly amount as a 64bit kernel but function at points as a 32bit kernel.
I love kernels.
Except when they panic
On topic I prefer OSX as my day to day PC (music/movies/internet/photoshop/some development here and there). I would go over to Win7 side more if it actually could make a build environment for Android. At the moment I only use Win7 for gaming, as that is really the only thing going for it apart from being cheaper than OSX.
Last edited by mmoc05c338f655; 2011-05-15 at 11:30 PM.
EVGA Classified SR-2 | Intel Xeon X5680 x 2 | Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 6 x 2GB | XFX HD5970 x 2
Intel PRO/1000 PT Server NIC | ASUS Xonar DX | Corsair AX1200 | Corsair TX750OCZ Vertex2 60GB | WD Velociraptor 300GB x 2 | Samsung Spinpoint MP4 500GBEK-FB SR2 - Acetal+Nickel | EK-Supreme HF - Acetal x 2 | EK-FC5970 Acetal x 2
Thermochill TA120.4 x 3 | Thermochill TA120.3 | Swiftech MCP655 x 2
Seriously? I do this for a living. XP SP2 support ended June 2010, SP3 abd 64 bit are supported (and available on new machines) until 2014. Please don't talk trash when you're clueless.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/w...lp/end-support
Felt great switching from Win 98 to windows 2000 since the latter didn't feature "BSOD of the day" whenever a program crashed.
Multiple CPU core performance seem just awful with Win XP. It seems to always want all software to run on core 0 and 1 if the program itself doesn't have some manual Process Affinity set to it.
Switching to Windows 7 on our i7 machines at work compared to when having XP made a huge difference in core management and performance overall. Another place where Windows 7 prevails is when it's pre-fetching programs to the RAM. I don't have to wait (as much) for a program to start when using W7.
No.. XP should die off now. It's not made for modern hardware, face it.