Is it my birthday? Is it Christmas? Could it be? A third Hobbit movie?
Read this ASAP http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=92873
cant wait for this movie, i've been a lotr fan back in time
One of my favorite books - can't wait for the movie.
If a video game developer removed tumors from players, they'd whine about nerfing their loss in weight and access to radiation powers. -Cracked.com
Other topic : Does anyone find it strange to see Dale so much populated in the production video? Isn't this city supposed to be abandonned since Smaug's coming, and all the survivors founded Esgaroth or Laketown?
One of the first movies I can say I read the book to! I saw the previews in theaters, took them long enough. They've been talking about it for years and years, I never forgot! A bit surprised it's spread out into two movies, but as long as they don't skip entire parts of the book it will be well worth it. The book was far more involved than the trilogy and far better as far as I'm concerned.
Looking forward to it.
I'm freaking way stoked to see this!
Peter Jackson and Ian McKellen have confirmed officially that "The Hobbit" will be three films, instead of two, to accommodate Toliken's notes at the end of 'Return of the King". So, what do you guys think? I am personally for this, but I know that a lot of people are against it.
Last edited by Garots; 2012-07-30 at 06:04 PM.
Here's some more info:
Also, merging with the actual Hobbit article.
Three parts? ME GUSTA!
Okay, I'm a big fan of Lord of the Rings and I can't wait for the Hobbit... but this doesn't seem right.
I could understand making it two movies, since there is so much happening. Making it only one movie would have meant a lot got skipped and we'd get a hasty story.
But three movies? That just seems like they're milking it now. I really hope it doesn't take away from the excitement by stretching it.
Though I guess it could work, they got lots of appendixes to work from as well. There's so much they could throw in.
It's just that last time I heard people say that splitting a movie into two parts was a good idea was with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. And I thought part 1 sucked horribly, it could have been completely skipped. I don't want that to happen to the Hobbit, then again... This isn't lame ass harry potter we're talking about. And Peter Jackson has done an awesome job on the first trilogy, so who knows... I guess we just have to trust him.