Page 37 of 76 FirstFirst ...
27
35
36
37
38
39
47
... LastLast
  1. #721
    Quote Originally Posted by conscript View Post
    Gamdwelf already explained what it is, but what is causing people the most outrage is that it just looks different than what you are used to. Since you are on this site I imagine you play or have played WoW. Imagine running the game on a mediocre graphics card getting only 24 fps giving you a slightly choppy game experience, but over time you are used to it and you grow used to that. Then one day you install a newer card and that FPS doubles and suddenly the game looks much more vibrant and smooth. It is basically the same experience between the 48 FPS he shot this in and the traditional 24 FPS. We are so used to watching movies at a certain quality that such a dramatic bump makes it tough to adjust at first. Everything looks more hyper-realistic and less of a traditional movie style. That seems to be the biggest hang up for so many negative reviews. I hope my theater is showing it in 48 FPS on the 3d and 24 FPS on the 2d so I can see both firsthand and see if the reported differences are really that noticeable.

    Apparently the end credits run for SIXTEEN minutes.
    I'll watch ALL the credits.
    ALL of them.

    Also, this is pretty cool:


    Seeing this, those reviewers must have a heart of stone or a very big pet peeve with 48fps and/or the three movie thing, how can you not be excited for this ^^
    Last edited by Arrowstorm; 2012-12-06 at 09:05 PM.

  2. #722
    Fluffy Kitten conscript's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Jonesville, Michigan
    Posts
    9,986
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrowstorm View Post
    Seeing this, those reviewers must have a heart of stone or a very big pet peeve with 48fps and/or the three movie thing, how can you not be excited for this ^^
    The WETA miniature at the start of that video is incredible. I will never stop being stupid jealous of their creativity and artistic ability.

  3. #723
    Epic! Northy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wizz Con Sin
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrowstorm View Post
    I'll watch ALL the credits.
    ALL of them.

    Also, this is pretty cool:


    Seeing this, those reviewers must have a heart of stone or a very big pet peeve with 48fps and/or the three movie thing, how can you not be excited for this ^^
    I hadn't seen that video. That was phenomenal. Thank you.
    The Most Astounding Fact of the Universe


    Invisible flying spaghetti monster in the sky bless America.

  4. #724
    Bloodsail Admiral Daverid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,124
    Quote Originally Posted by Northy View Post
    I hadn't seen that video. That was phenomenal. Thank you.
    NGGGGHHH ... Thanks Arrow ... That was INCREDIBLE and just reaffirmed myself that no matter what the morons on Rotten Tomatoes say ... This movie (and the trilogy in general) is going to be fucking spectacular.

  5. #725
    Lord of the Ring is absolutely a classic. I really hope that Hobbit will keep this level.

  6. #726

    Hobbit in Imax

    Hi,
    I have a question regarding the screen resolution of the upcoming Hobbit movie.

    youtube.com/watch?v=nTeXIoQWUu4
    0:30 you can read "in real 3D, HFR 3 and IMax 3D".


    As far as I know, the movie wasn't shot with Imax cameras (they used red epics) so the resolution might not be as good as an Imax documentary. Perhaps they are showing the movie only half as big as the actual Imax screen so that I am in the cinema and 3/4 of the screen is just black

    Does anyone know whether they show the movie full screen in Imax or should I go into a smaller cinema.

    Yours sincerely from snowy Switzerland

  7. #727
    bump. i want to know too

  8. #728
    this will probaly fixed though software interpolation.

  9. #729
    I wonder how the 48 frame rate filming will impact on the film along with increased resolution. I suspect it will make some scene appear fake if the CGI if not up to scratch ...

  10. #730
    I like all the people who never had seen the movie attacking critique of it coming from people whom have actually seen it. Talk about "feasting off the palm". EA and Activision are spending millions to get such outcome for whatever they release and here it happens free.
    Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.

  11. #731
    I am Murloc! Naidia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ft. Worth, Texas
    Posts
    5,881
    Nice vid, just made the next 7 days even longer. So pumped for my Midnight Imax showing. It's going to be one beautiful night.


  12. #732
    Apparently the 48fps option is not being shown in all cinema's see below for a list of cinema's that will be showing The Hobbit in 48 fps.

    http://www.48fpsmovies.com/48-fps-theater-list/

    So make sure you book it in one of those.

  13. #733
    Bloodsail Admiral Daverid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,124
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilian View Post
    I like all the people who never had seen the movie attacking critique of it coming from people whom have actually seen it. Talk about "feasting off the palm". EA and Activision are spending millions to get such outcome for whatever they release and here it happens free.
    The problem is that the majority of the complaints in the reviews (And it appears why people are giving it bad rating on RT) is purely because of the 48FPS. Which sure, that is what Peter Jackson filmed it in and is the 'Proper' viewing format. But it's absurd when you read a review and they say how they generally thought the movie was good, but then spend a page dissing the 48FPS and hence give it a 'Rotten' Rating. Even if 48FPS is the proper viewing format, PJ is releasing it in 24FPS specifically to give people that option if they cannot adapt to the 48FPS or simply don't enjoy it. So the 48FPS shouldn't be the major reason why they review it so harshly, because there is that Option to watch in 24 or 48.

    The main other complaint is that the movie is simply to long and slow. Which frankly strikes me as double standards when people start their review with how much they loved LOTR and the Trilogy is a Classic, but then the next minute try and say that Hobbit was slow and tedious... Like sure I haven't seen the movie yet, but one of the things which make LOTR SO GREAT is that IT IS SLOW. Every movie in the Original Trilogy has so many slow moments, with tons of landscape shots, travelling companions and armies and lots of talking and scenery etc. It was something that made LOTR so iconic and personally I LOVE the fact that PJ draws you into Middle Earth so much that you don't mind the movies being so slow. Just strikes me as very hypocritical and makes me trust the review alot less.

    I guess being a massive fanboy I get hyper defensive, but it just seems like the reviewers are being ridiculous. Doesn't really matter in the end, I've watched enough production Videos, Trailers etc to know that this is going to be a fucking amazing movie, no matter what the reviewers say. It just would make me sad if people don't watch it because of a few reviewers grudge against 48FPS and hypocrisy about movie pace.

  14. #734
    Quote Originally Posted by Daverid View Post
    The problem is that the majority of the complaints in the reviews (And it appears why people are giving it bad rating on RT) is purely because of the 48FPS. Which sure, that is what Peter Jackson filmed it in and is the 'Proper' viewing format. But it's absurd when you read a review and they say how they generally thought the movie was good, but then spend a page dissing the 48FPS and hence give it a 'Rotten' Rating. Even if 48FPS is the proper viewing format, PJ is releasing it in 24FPS specifically to give people that option if they cannot adapt to the 48FPS or simply don't enjoy it. So the 48FPS shouldn't be the major reason why they review it so harshly, because there is that Option to watch in 24 or 48.

    The main other complaint is that the movie is simply to long and slow. Which frankly strikes me as double standards when people start their review with how much they loved LOTR and the Trilogy is a Classic, but then the next minute try and say that Hobbit was slow and tedious... Like sure I haven't seen the movie yet, but one of the things which make LOTR SO GREAT is that IT IS SLOW. Every movie in the Original Trilogy has so many slow moments, with tons of landscape shots, travelling companions and armies and lots of talking and scenery etc. It was something that made LOTR so iconic and personally I LOVE the fact that PJ draws you into Middle Earth so much that you don't mind the movies being so slow. Just strikes me as very hypocritical and makes me trust the review alot less.

    I guess being a massive fanboy I get hyper defensive, but it just seems like the reviewers are being ridiculous. Doesn't really matter in the end, I've watched enough production Videos, Trailers etc to know that this is going to be a fucking amazing movie, no matter what the reviewers say. It just would make me sad if people don't watch it because of a few reviewers grudge against 48FPS and hypocrisy about movie pace.
    Couldn't have said it better myself.

  15. #735
    Scarab Lord SirRobin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Counciltucky
    Posts
    4,030
    Quote Originally Posted by conscript View Post
    The WETA miniature at the start of that video is incredible. I will never stop being stupid jealous of their creativity and artistic ability.
    WETA is amazing. So much talent and imagination. I wish I had even a tenth of it. Love their Dr Grordbort stuff too.
    Last edited by SirRobin; 2012-12-07 at 09:21 PM.

  16. #736
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrowstorm View Post
    Calling them dumb artsy and then say /sarcasm over makes me think you DON'T think they're dumb and artsy.
    You clearly did not get it.

  17. #737
    Fluffy Kitten conscript's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Jonesville, Michigan
    Posts
    9,986
    Quote Originally Posted by Toccs View Post
    Apparently the 48fps option is not being shown in all cinema's see below for a list of cinema's that will be showing The Hobbit in 48 fps.

    http://www.48fpsmovies.com/48-fps-theater-list/

    So make sure you book it in one of those.
    I didn't expect it to be in every theater, but its only in 6 theaters in my entire state. That blows. I don't think I can bring myself to drive over two hours to see it in 48fps.

  18. #738
    Hmmm... Not sure if I want to see it in 48fps or 24fps first now.

  19. #739
    Quote Originally Posted by conscript View Post
    I didn't expect it to be in every theater, but its only in 6 theaters in my entire state. That blows. I don't think I can bring myself to drive over two hours to see it in 48fps.
    That blows considering in my state there are 6-8 within an hour or so drive of me or less.

  20. #740
    Field Marshal Oboloz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    88
    Hey I want to buy some tickets for next Friday, but I am having a hard time deciding between IMAX and HDR. I am leaning towards HDR but the complaints are discouraging..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •