View Poll Results: Dwarf

Voters
232. You may not vote on this poll
  • Thorin Oakenshield

    79 34.05%
  • Balin

    34 14.66%
  • Bifur

    4 1.72%
  • Bofur

    11 4.74%
  • Bombur

    22 9.48%
  • Dori

    2 0.86%
  • Dwalin

    27 11.64%
  • Fili

    12 5.17%
  • Kili

    29 12.50%
  • Gloin

    8 3.45%
  • Nori

    1 0.43%
  • Oin

    1 0.43%
  • Ori

    2 0.86%
  1. #1441
    I don't know if this has been posted or not, but I saw it on Imgur and I thought I'd put it here so everyone can see it.




    Amazing poster I say, love it a lot.
    SOS
    ----------------------
    Last.fm
    ----------------------
    Drop That Kitty

  2. #1442
    Can't wait to see the next LoTR, The Destruction of Smaug. I really enjoyed The Hobbit, and I haven't seen any LOTR before except the first one at release.

  3. #1443
    Pit Lord Endonyx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    North-Holland, Amsterdam
    Posts
    2,377
    Quote Originally Posted by McNeil View Post
    Can't wait to see the next LoTR, The Destruction of Smaug. I really enjoyed The Hobbit, and I haven't seen any LOTR before except the first one at release.
    Think your talking about the new Hobbit, desolation of smaug xD also you havent seen any of the LOTR before except the first one xd?
    |Asus Rampage IV Formula|GeIL 16 GB DDR3-1600 Kit|Intel i7-3930K|EVGA GTX980 Hydro Copper|OCZ VTX4-512G x2|Corsair HX1050|Cosmos II|ASUS Xonar D2X/XDT|Astro A40|Logitech Z-5500|Custom Watercooling System|
    Friend Code - 4785-6590-2958 (PM First) Xodex - Protection Warrior - Vek'nilash - Quel'thalas - Sylvanas - From 14-11-2005 ~ 22-2-2013 Retired

  4. #1444
    Overall it wasn't bad but it kinda felt like a "cheaper" and less epic version of LOTR. Which is pretty much what the book was as well but still. They should have done the Hobbit movie first.

    Also I didn't really appreciate the childish moments. I guess they wanted to put in some funny moments for the kids but it felt really out of place. Especially the scene with the goblin king. I was like ".... really?" Radagast also felt more like a silly Hogwarts teacher.

  5. #1445
    Bloodsail Admiral Stevegasm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,071
    Quote Originally Posted by Doylez View Post
    Overall it wasn't bad but it kinda felt like a "cheaper" and less epic version of LOTR. Which is pretty much what the book was as well but still. They should have done the Hobbit movie first.

    Also I didn't really appreciate the childish moments. I guess they wanted to put in some funny moments for the kids but it felt really out of place. Especially the scene with the goblin king. I was like ".... really?" Radagast also felt more like a silly Hogwarts teacher.
    The Hobbit is a kids book, so it's to be expected that there will be childish moments. LOTR is about 1200 pages, while the Hobbit was something like 300 or so (been 21 years since I read it so memories are a little foggy with such detail), so yeah, you're going to have a difference in epicness. The movie seemed to hit everything I remember from the book pretty dead on and it seems like quite a good adaptation. I think a lot of people forget the fact that the Hobbit is a children's novel.

  6. #1446
    Sugar & Spice Everything Nice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    http://brantsteele.net/hungergames/r.php?c=Kpx8umsn
    Posts
    4,926



    Found this quite amusing and relevant!

    Bread is the paper of the food industry.
    You write your sandwich on it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lysah
    Even Hanna, who I consider the worst of the worst, the noobest of the noobs, easily worst
    player on the team in any given game I play is still miles ahead of most average players



  7. #1447
    Quote Originally Posted by Doylez View Post
    Overall it wasn't bad but it kinda felt like a "cheaper" and less epic version of LOTR. Which is pretty much what the book was as well but still. They should have done the Hobbit movie first.
    My thoughts on that are more that... well a really good version of LOTR had never been done. The cartoons for it was okish... but not all that good really. It was amazing to actually have it done in a satisfying way. The Hobbit being done was probably less urgent because the cartoon for that actually had been brilliant. At least that's my own reasoning about why it was done in this order.

  8. #1448
    Quote Originally Posted by Arlee View Post
    My thoughts on that are more that... well a really good version of LOTR had never been done. The cartoons for it was okish... but not all that good really. It was amazing to actually have it done in a satisfying way. The Hobbit being done was probably less urgent because the cartoon for that actually had been brilliant. At least that's my own reasoning about why it was done in this order.
    The Lord of the Rings simply has more action and a more mature storyline. That's why it was made first.
    Remember that prior to the LotR movies, fantasy movies in general were shunned. Only if done right, something as big as LotR could change this.

    If the Hobbit was released first instead, it probably wouldn't have had the impact to change how society looks at fantasy movies. And it wouldn't have been 3 movies, it would've been 1 too full with stuff to make sense. The LotR movies were the only logical option.

    But looking back, for the fans it would've been more fun to see the Hobbit first and Lord of the Rings second.
    Chronologically it makes more sense, and in terms of action and darker storyline as well.

    But do take in mind that because LotR was made first, we do get more enhanced Hobbit movies with all kinds of backstory that wouldn't have been in it had the Hobbit been made first. So in a sense, what we have now is better.

  9. #1449
    Fantasy movies were shunned what? I mean some of them certainly (and they pretty much deserved it)... but there have been a number of very successful fantasy movies. Maybe if you define fantasy movies as being only ones where there are elves and dwarves... the genre of Fantasy is MUCH MUCH larger than that though.

  10. #1450
    Beren & Lúthien someone?

    THAT would be the story

  11. #1451
    The Insane peggleftw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Kingston,London, England
    Posts
    16,543
    before i start comparing the hobbit to Lotr i need to see the whole trilogy i think. i really enjoyed the movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by endus View Post
    A thread about how hard it is being a white dude is not really a reasonable topic.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    You are assuming Cybran actually reads the articles he links.
    I suspect he is actually some Soviet algorithm gone rogue, transmitting from some forgotten bunker, responding to keywords by googling them and adding "+bad" to the search query, and then just copy/pasting anything it comes across.

  12. #1452
    Warchief Northy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,208
    http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=100983

    The 3rd installment entitled "The Hobbit: There and Back Again" has officially been moved back to December 2014. Not a big deal for me, I don't mind the wait, and I always love going to movies over the Christmas holiday anyways. Loved the first one and looking forward to the next two, and looking forward to seeing the final three-film trilogy in its full uninterrupted entirety.

  13. #1453
    Quote Originally Posted by Northy View Post
    http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=100983

    The 3rd installment entitled "The Hobbit: There and Back Again" has officially been moved back to December 2014. Not a big deal for me, I don't mind the wait, and I always love going to movies over the Christmas holiday anyways. Loved the first one and looking forward to the next two, and looking forward to seeing the final three-film trilogy in its full uninterrupted entirety.
    That's good news in my opinion, Summer Movies sometimes have great quality but are usually only there for the money. Holiday Season movies are often either the cheap Christmas grabs or of great quality.

  14. #1454
    Warchief Northy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,208
    The Hobbit: AUJ coming out on Blu-Ray on March 19th. Gonna rent the heck out of it. Regretting not having seen it more times in the theatre. Saving my money for the extended edition trilogy box set though.

  15. #1455
    Scarab Lord xylophone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    4,315
    Anybody know if there is gonna be a hfr version available on blu ray?
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Lets say you have a two 3 inch lines. One is all red and the other is 48% red and 52% blue. Does that mean there's a 50-50 chance they're both red or is the second line matching the all red line by 48%?
    ^^^ Wells using an analogy

  16. #1456
    Pretty sure Blu-ray doesn't support HFR (48FPS)

  17. #1457
    Pandaren Monk Phookah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Zebes, SR-21
    Posts
    1,980
    This movie was awful. Why in the hell did they have to go and ruin The Hobbit? Not to mention them splitting the book up into 3 movies (really?) It's my favorite book in the world, I read it on average on 3-4 times a year but there isn't even CLOSE to 3 movies worth of action/story.
    The whole thing just screams "I'm Peter Jackson. Now give me your money, nerds."

  18. #1458
    Pit Lord Skinny Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NEET-land
    Posts
    2,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Phookah View Post
    This movie was awful. Why in the hell did they have to go and ruin The Hobbit? Not to mention them splitting the book up into 3 movies (really?) It's my favorite book in the world, I read it on average on 3-4 times a year but there isn't even CLOSE to 3 movies worth of action/story.
    The whole thing just screams "I'm Peter Jackson. Now give me your money, nerds."
    Yeah, Peter Jackson obviously needs more money, that must be why he does it. >_>

    If you didn't already know, they're adding story from the appendices, explaining all the things happening at the same time as the story of the Bilbo book.

  19. #1459
    I expected a bit more from it

  20. #1460
    Quote Originally Posted by Phookah View Post
    This movie was awful. Why in the hell did they have to go and ruin The Hobbit? Not to mention them splitting the book up into 3 movies (really?) It's my favorite book in the world, I read it on average on 3-4 times a year but there isn't even CLOSE to 3 movies worth of action/story.
    The whole thing just screams "I'm Peter Jackson. Now give me your money, nerds."
    Peter Jackson had originally intended it to be one very long film, or two shorter films. Certain companies who aim to profit from such creations decided it would be best as trilogy. Thus, it is.

    As to ruining the book, I disagree. The book's still the same as it always was and the film makes a decent stab at it. With literal classics, you can almost never have a perfect film to match the original source material. For as many people that liked the LotR trilogy, just as many derided them for not following the books perfectly. You can't win either way as a film maker. Also, that's not just a defence of Peter Jackson in particular, but for any director trying to translate a script of a screenplay of a book, into a visual medium.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •