Haste only reduces the GCD after spells. Not after melee abilities.
Also, the spell GCD effect on haste for instant spells still applies -- that's one reason why haste is useful for resto druids, who use many instant-cast heals.
Haste only reduces the GCD after spells. Not after melee abilities.
Also, the spell GCD effect on haste for instant spells still applies -- that's one reason why haste is useful for resto druids, who use many instant-cast heals.
New Expansion preview HEREGearscore is like a bikini. It shows you what you already know and doesn't show what REALLY matters.
Like I said, insults on all sides are not to be tolerated.
Please move on and leave the insults behind.
i dunno about u guys, but i prefer FP to UP
story is i took a wow hiatus right before the zanadalari patch and right before the unholy nerfs. when i returned, i couldnt do nearly the same dps, so i figured id go frost and, since i had wotlk dw frost experience before the big nerfs (goooooooood times), i did much better than my original unholy dps. no one ever pointed out in random heroics that i was using an "inferior" pres, b/c how can u argue with the highest group dps percentage on every boss and overall?
it was only recently that i figured out unholy is the generally accepted pres. I tried UP for a few days and it *seemed* to be as good if not slightly better.... but then this:
during BoT last night i thought id do a dps comparison:
after valiona and theralion, theres 2 large dragonkin right? right. i decided id use UP on one and FP on the other.
killing machine procced almost equally (actually slightly more in unholy, but...)
results:
UP: 19k
FP: 24k
...difference is somewhat scary, really....
i realize RNG is RNG, but come on, 5k more dps for a different presence? thats ridiculous
i also realize i might have a more experienced feel to FP than UP, but i have to admit, i felt rp starved in UP
my (personal) conclusion: FP > UP
flame all u want, im sticking with FP
I'm sorry, but one mob is way way way way WAY too small of a sample to compare them. You're also comparing the playstyle you're familiar with against the play style you're not familiar with. Did you check logs to see if you had any lucky or unlucky streaks? If you were RP starved in RP, perhaps you were not following priority.
I won't hate on you for doing what you prefer, but that small level of data can only lead to problems. It's an anecdote, not evidence.
The EJ main post has not been updated for 4.2, but it pushes UH heavily. The changes in 4.2 should, if anything, make UP even better as the haste it gives means those offhands generating KM procs will happen more often.
For AoE it recommends UH, and FP for EXTENDED aoe. I can't think of many situations that have extended AoE anymore. Especially long enough to warrant dropping all your RP twice. This also shouldn't really have changed with the patch notes.
Last edited by Cactrot; 2011-07-15 at 10:49 PM.
not going to quote the whole thing but you said it right when you said you PREFER. although not entirely the best way to go it still stand with this though...
you will do better with what you prefer regardless of what other people say. if you HATE UH but it does a theoretical 5% more dps but you seem to do less then guess what... who cares that UH does more dps if you do more in the one YOU like. YOU will do less dps and therefore it is irrelevant as to what OTHER people do. if YOU do less dps in a different spec/presence/forging then pic what does the best for YOU vs the community.
Though this is always true you may come out "ahead" using UHP and a haste build... i am in the same boat and i come out slightly behind which is why i use a mastery build with FP.
and as he said flame all you want im sticking to what works best for me.
New Expansion preview HEREGearscore is like a bikini. It shows you what you already know and doesn't show what REALLY matters.
All this arguing and stick poking is silly. If you are able to get more than the amount of haste to GCD cap you in FP(17.4%) then an UP haste build will be optimal for you. If not, then a mastery based FP build will work better. Then of course there are specific encounters to take into consideration. There is no "is best" build at the moment.
Ok ok I'm confused.
So from what I've understood, if I'm aoeing for a longer time and even have haste stacked, FP is a good thing.
In the Beth'tilac fight I'm assigned to kill the little skittering spiderlings which I have to aoe alot, for whole of phase 1. I should do this in FP? (I've done it in UH so far)
Can I slow these spiderlings btw with chillbains in my spec?
Ok i've tested it about 2 hours and i must say, i rarely find any drastic DPS change between the two presences...
Also i found out i never run out of "skills to cast" while in frost presence...
That seems overly simplistic. The number for the GCD haste cap seems waaay off to me, but either way, the haste cap doesn't affect a pretty good % of our damage. Why would having so much haste that FP becomes pointless mean that UP is better, considering it doesn't affect the GCD in UP AT ALL to begin with. I'd think that at that up to that point haste would be more beneficial for FP, not UP... I'm just not following the logic of "when you have a 1 sec GCD naturally, you should swap to the presence that gives you a 1 sec GCD"...
Holy crap look at what I started. I'm gone for a few hours and this just took off lol. Thanks for the support i suppose. Some people just don't know when to quit, let alone apologize for their mistakes.