Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
... LastLast
  1. #1
    Deleted

    Exclamation Entirely new computer - rate the components?

    Hey all, I've come into a bit of cash recently and I've been looking to fully upgrade my PC for a long time now, here's what I've gotten so far:

    Code:
    1		LG DVD Writer, GH22NS50, SATA, Black, OEM	 £ 14.93	
    1		1TB Samsung HD103SJ SpinPoint F3 SATA-II 3.5" Hard Drive	 £ 39.05	
    1		Microsoft Sidewinder X4 USB Gaming Keyboard - Black (JQD-00006)	 £ 36.23	
    1		SPEEDLINK Vivo 2.1 Subwoofer System	 £ 28.37	
    1		Intel Core i5-2500K 3.30GHz (Sandybridge) Socket LGA1155 Processor - Retail	 £ 159.59	
    1		be quiet! Dark Rock Advanced CPU Cooler	 £ 39.95	
    1		800W Mushkin Enhanced Joule ATX2.3 Power Supply	 £ 79.99	
    1		ASUS P8P67 Pro Intel P67 (REV B3) Socket 1155 DDR3 PCI-Express Motherboard	 £ 120.55	
    1		Coolermaster Storm Enforcer Gaming Midi Chassis	 £ 71.99	
    1		Gainward GeForce GTX 570 PHANTOM Ed. 1280MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card	 £ 275.94	
    1		8GB Corsair Vengeance Blue LP (2x4GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit - CML8GX3M2A1600C9B	 £ 46.5	
    1		Mushkin Chronos 120GB 2.5" SATA-III Solid State Hard Drive	 £ 129.95	
    1		22" LG IPS226V-PN Widescreen IPS LED Monitor	 £ 131	
     	Total: £1174.03

    I'm using AriaPC's website (a UK company, I can't link yet on here, but please use that site if you want to change anything.)

    EDIT: As the thread has progressed, I've updated this post to make it easier to see what my current build, based on advice, is.

    EDIT: I can post links now. https://www.aria.co.uk/WishList/-XBzFUh0adjym-Wlr67nJQ,,
    Last edited by mmoc7256340762; 2011-08-26 at 03:28 AM.

  2. #2
    imo with a budget like that you should look into either a 6990/590 card or going crossfire/sli with 560ti/6950/570/6970 cards
    some easy places you could shave some cost off to afford it:
    get rid of the blue ray drive... everyone I know with one never uses it... who wants to watch blu-ray on a 22" computer monitor anyways?
    1600mhz ram should be cheaper, and there won't be any difference in gaming
    ssd's don't improve performance, just loading times, so ask yourself if you'd prefer better framerates / higher settings whenever you're playing or have 5 less seconds on the load screen.
    cheaper case maybe? any mid tower with a couple case fans will work fine.. unless you are really picky about making it look good
    hyper212+ cooler... noctua is better, but the hyper212+ can take you to around 4.5ghz.

    Also get a samsung spinpoint f3 hdd instead if you can, they're faster than caviar blue and should be about the same price.

    edit: sata III has twice the transfer rate of sata II. It doesn't make a difference at all though except for high end ssd's, since nothing else comes close to sata II transfer rates.
    Last edited by taekvideo; 2011-08-26 at 02:14 AM.
    If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the Mighty One... now I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Arslay View Post
    You listed two different graphics cards... huh?
    he did say in his post why..
    If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the Mighty One... now I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds.

  4. #4
    The Lightbringer Uggorthaholy's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Weatherford, TX
    Posts
    3,169
    As said above

    Either a Samsung Spinpoint F3 or Caviar Black HDD. (I would even say get 2, why not?)

    Get 1600 mhz ram. Anything higher is not really recommended.

    Now, my own input

    Get a GTX 580. Gives you an option to get a second one next year and SLi them. Best performing SLi combo available, especially at the price.

  5. #5
    Elemental Lord Rixis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    8,864
    i'd like to argue the point made above about ssds improving load pages by about 5 seconds

    i have an ssd .. it's a hell of a lot more than 5 seconds, 30, 40, 60 seconds, and with relogging toons, hopping around between continents etc (and if you run your OS on it as you should, then windows loads a lot quicker too)

    it's about how much you value that speed of course, but 5 seconds seems to be the standard completely exaggerated number people give out for no real reason

  6. #6
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by taekvideo View Post
    imo with a budget like that you should look into either a 6990/590 card or going crossfire/sli with 560ti/6950/570/6970 cards
    some easy places you could shave some cost off to afford it:
    Those kind of cards have crossed my mind, but pushing money to the £600 mark like with the 590, is really difficult for me to do, is it really worth it? At the cost of losing system power elsewhere?


    Quote Originally Posted by taekvideo View Post
    get rid of the blue ray drive... everyone I know with one never uses it... who wants to watch blu-ray on a 22" computer monitor anyways?
    That's definitely true, to be honest we don't even buy Blu-Rays, I just thought I'd go with the crowd. :>


    Quote Originally Posted by taekvideo View Post
    1600mhz ram should be cheaper, and there won't be any difference in gaming
    Sure that sounds fair; can you help me out here? My knowledge is pretty limited when it comes to this kind of thing. If you could use the AriaPC website, that'd be handy, I plan on ordering it all from there.

    Quote Originally Posted by taekvideo View Post
    ssd's don't improve performance, just loading times, so ask yourself if you'd prefer better framerates / higher settings whenever you're playing or have 5 less seconds on the load screen.
    I'm thinking this is something I won't budge on; it's been something I've been after for a long while now. Although the main focus of the PC will be for gaming, I'm going to University next year, so I'll be using the PC for other things, so the faster loading times will apply elsewhere too. I think it's a vanity thing but I've wanted it for too long. :>

    Quote Originally Posted by taekvideo View Post
    cheaper case maybe? any mid tower with a couple case fans will work fine.. unless you are really picky about making it look good
    Another vanity thing really, but if I can get something that will function just as well and will save me a few £, I'd be good with that. Any suggestions?

    Quote Originally Posted by taekvideo View Post
    hyper212+ cooler... noctua is better, but the hyper212+ can take you to around 4.5ghz.
    I'll check it out.

    Quote Originally Posted by taekvideo View Post
    Also get a samsung spinpoint f3 hdd instead if you can, they're faster than caviar blue and should be about the same price.
    Same as above.


    Thanks a lot for your reply.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by uggorthaholy View Post
    Get a GTX 580. Gives you an option to get a second one next year and SLi them. Best performing SLi combo available, especially at the price.
    I'm a bit confused by this. :P
    Are you saying that two GTX 580s are the best performing SLI-combo for its price? Because the GTX460 and GT"X"550 Ti both would then like a word with you! :P
    In the future, when the GTX580 will have dropped in price (say, two years? It will not cost as much in the light of a potential 680, but, it will not drop to half-price which it needs to, to be considered in this way) it will then not be the best performing SLI-combo, obviously, nor for the price either. D:


    Yeaa, I'm tired.

    EDIT: Oh, and SSDs make my wow-loadingscreens 6~seconds. Make of that what you will.
     

  8. #8
    SATA2 has a bandwith limit of 3Gb/s, SATA3 has a limit of 6Gb/s. Normal HDD's have a hard time filling up the SATA1 bandwith of 1.5Gb/s.
    All SATA ports are fully backwards compatible. So you can use a SATA device on a SATA3 port and vice versa. If you plug a SATA3 SSD into a SATA/SATA2 port however, it won't be able to use it's full potential.

    Change RAM to http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Compo...roductId=46060 or any other 8GB DDR3 1600MHz version. This is just the RAM most people use these days. Just make sure you get 1.5V or less RAM.

    For the videocard, both are solid choices. The 570 is better than the 6950 and in my eyes definitely worth the £30 extra.

    I've never heard about that PSU's made by Mushkin, looking at the specs it appears to be good enough, but I prefer Corsair/Seasonic over that. Unless you go SLI anything over 500W is actually more than enough.

    Also never heard of Mushkin making SSD's, so I won't start about this.

    -edit- O, wow, a whole list of suggestions already made... damn I'm slow...
    Last edited by Asmekiel; 2011-08-26 at 02:24 AM.

  9. #9
    Deleted
    Just a little update, I can post links now, so my original post is a bit more user-friendly now.

  10. #10
    Elemental Lord Rixis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    8,864
    Originally Posted by taekvideo
    hyper212+ cooler... noctua is better, but the hyper212+ can take you to around 4.5ghz.
    I'll check it out.
    as you're in the uk you can check out the darkrock be quiet too, they cost more than the 212, but less than the noctua, and you can get some fair whack out of them, i had my cpu up to 5.04 ghz at about 78 degrees, dropped down to 4.8 ghz for now at 67 degrees full load (folding with boinc)

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Asmekiel View Post
    All SATA ports are fully backwards compatible. So you can use a SATA device on a SATA3 port and vice versa. If you plug a SATA3 SSD into a SATA/SATA2 port however, it won't be able to use it's full potential.
    To a degree, yes. But s-ATA 1.5Gbps interfaces and cables lack the clips that s-ATA3.0Gbps and 6.0Gbps have. It would be possible to connect them across generations, but not adviced.

    Why do I always nitpick when tired? D:
     

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Rixis View Post
    i'd like to argue the point made above about ssds improving load pages by about 5 seconds

    i have an ssd .. it's a hell of a lot more than 5 seconds, 30, 40, 60 seconds, and with relogging toons, hopping around between continents etc (and if you run your OS on it as you should, then windows loads a lot quicker too)

    it's about how much you value that speed of course, but 5 seconds seems to be the standard completely exaggerated number people give out for no real reason
    considering my laptop with a 5400rpm hdd takes less than 30 seconds to load/login to wow, the ssd would have to be well into the negative seconds to give that kind of performance boost.
    If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the Mighty One... now I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Rixis View Post
    as you're in the uk you can check out the darkrock be quiet too, they cost more than the 212, but less than the noctua, and you can get some fair whack out of them, i had my cpu up to 5.04 ghz at about 78 degrees, dropped down to 4.8 ghz for now at 67 degrees full load (folding with boinc)
    Be Quiet! didn't take this name for no reason. Their stuff really is quiet. (If you care about noise coming from your PC this is a solid choice)
    The Dark Rock Pro is a little better than the Advanced, but isn't in stock now.

  14. #14
    Elemental Lord Rixis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    8,864
    it's not just the progress bar screen, it's things like loading all the models in the world etc once your into it, and even at a 30 second load screen, you could be saving up to 25 or so seconds per screen, which for some people can be quite a few screens and quite a lot of time over a session

    and you must have a relatively decent laptop, i just replaced a decent laptop (ran ultra everything with 50+fps) and was getting load screens (by estimation) closer to 60-90 seconds most of the time

    edit: and yes, the be quiet is silent, basically the only part of my pc i can hear is the psu (though i play with headphones on so i don't even hear that)

  15. #15
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Asmekiel View Post
    SATA2 has a bandwith limit of 3Gb/s, SATA3 has a limit of 6Gb/s. Normal HDD's have a hard time filling up the SATA1 bandwith of 1.5Gb/s.
    All SATA ports are fully backwards compatible. So you can use a SATA device on a SATA3 port and vice versa. If you plug a SATA3 SSD into a SATA/SATA2 port however, it won't be able to use it's full potential.
    Ah, cheers for clearing that up; so would you say it's worth just going with a SATA2 HDD rather than a more expensive SATA3 one with the same capacity?

    Quote Originally Posted by Asmekiel View Post
    Change RAM to http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Compo...roductId=46060 or any other 8GB DDR3 1600MHz version. This is just the RAM most people use these days. Just make sure you get 1.5V or less RAM.
    Thanks again, I'll browse the site a little, but that looks like a solid choice to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Asmekiel View Post
    For the videocard, both are solid choices. The 570 is better than the 6950 and in my eyes definitely worth the £30 extra.
    Edging towards the 570 currently then.

    Quote Originally Posted by Asmekiel View Post
    I've never heard about that PSU's made by Mushkin, looking at the specs it appears to be good enough, but I prefer Corsair/Seasonic over that. Unless you go SLI anything over 500W is actually more than enough.

    Also never heard of Mushkin making SSD's, so I won't start about this.
    A friend and I were a little aprehensive of Mushkin too, but we took a plunge and bought parts for his PC, and they've been great thus far.

    ---------- Post added 2011-08-26 at 03:31 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Rixis View Post
    as you're in the uk you can check out the darkrock be quiet too, they cost more than the 212, but less than the noctua, and you can get some fair whack out of them, i had my cpu up to 5.04 ghz at about 78 degrees, dropped down to 4.8 ghz for now at 67 degrees full load (folding with boinc)
    http://www.aria.co.uk/Products?searc...&searchCat=927

    Which one are we looking at? That's a pretty hefty overclock by my standards~

  16. #16
    The Lightbringer Uggorthaholy's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Weatherford, TX
    Posts
    3,169
    Quote Originally Posted by tetrisgoat View Post
    I'm a bit confused by this. :P
    Are you saying that two GTX 580s are the best performing SLI-combo for its price? Because the GTX460 and GT"X"550 Ti both would then like a word with you! :P
    In the future, when the GTX580 will have dropped in price (say, two years? It will not cost as much in the light of a potential 680, but, it will not drop to half-price which it needs to, to be considered in this way) it will then not be the best performing SLI-combo, obviously, nor for the price either. D:


    Yeaa, I'm tired.

    EDIT: Oh, and SSDs make my wow-loadingscreens 6~seconds. Make of that what you will.
    the 580 is the best performing single card on the market, not necessarily price--->performance
    the 580 in SLi is the best performing dual-single-card setup (not counting dual GPU cards, hence the weird terming). not meaning price---> performance, just pure performance.

    I don't like the 590s, myself. And also, will prevent huge spending ona single 600 series card to beat it. Toss in an extra 580 and be good to go.

  17. #17
    Elemental Lord Rixis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    8,864
    http://www.aria.co.uk/Products?searc...&searchCat=927

    Which one are we looking at? That's a pretty hefty overclock by my standards~
    i'm only using the advanced

  18. #18
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by uggorthaholy View Post
    the 580 is the best performing single card on the market, not necessarily price--->performance
    the 580 in SLi is the best performing dual-single-card setup (not counting dual GPU cards, hence the weird terming). not meaning price---> performance, just pure performance.

    I don't like the 590s, myself. And also, will prevent huge spending ona single 600 series card to beat it. Toss in an extra 580 and be good to go.
    If it's definitely worth the extra cost, could you help me pick one out?

    http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Compo...TX+580+Series/

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by vBrad View Post
    If it's definitely worth the extra cost, could you help me pick one out?

    http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Compo...TX+580+Series/
    It's not. The price-difference from the GTX570 does not translate in an equal percentage in gained performance, which is actually quite small in comparison.
    It is the most powerful GPU availible at this time, but you also pay a price-premium for that fact alone.
    But if you insist, the top ASUS one, the Gainward, and the MSI TwinFrozr II are all great choices.
     

  20. #20
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by tetrisgoat View Post
    It's not. The price-difference from the GTX570 does not translate in an equal percentage in gained performance, which is actually quite small in comparison.
    It is the most powerful GPU availible at this time, but you also pay a price-premium for that fact alone.
    But if you insist, the top ASUS one, the Gainward, and the MSI TwinFrozr II are all great choices.
    I don't insist, saving money would be great really, so if the performance increase is not worth the extra £100, I'll stay away. Would you say the 570 is the way to go then?

    Here's Aria's range on those: https://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Comp...TX+570+Series/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •