Page 28 of 29 FirstFirst ...
18
26
27
28
29
LastLast
  1. #541
    Blademaster Piquenta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Lihonessa View Post
    I said it before, and I'll say it again.DPS does not deserve any Legendaries whatsoever. At all. Give them to the Healers and the Tanks. They are the ones keeping the raid alive, and thus they are the ones who can use the bonus.The fact that Blizzard does not understand this astounds me to this day.
    You, my friend, have a stupid point. Good dps makes you take down the boss, no dps = no takedowns, so you really need to think twice about that..

  2. #542
    Would not feel legendary at all then + making epic awesome questline ending with 3 different items would be the impossible thing, since we have multiple 'phases' for new legendaries
    Why would they even need a choice, no warrior tank is going to pick a 2h agi wep so they could just make it an automatic process based on your class.Also for those saying "no legendaries for bears because you wouldn't see it", the fire cat staff kind of ruins idea, it would be easy for them to make the legendary change the bear model of that to a bear with large plate armor, or made of rock, or whatever they want.

  3. #543
    Blademaster Piquenta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by thane View Post
    uh and ferals never get a legendary? cute. why should you get one, no one would see it anyway!
    They would see it on our performance. Tanking & dps'ing, whichever you're going for, it would improve it.

  4. #544
    People should start understand that legendary items have a big lore behind them, and that you can't just say let's make a quest and you pick any item you want from the list. If someone has been known to wield a legendary staff, and people get a quest for it to recraft it, it's a big difference changing the powers of the staff depending on the wielder , or just say well for you it will actually be a caster axe, and for the other it was actually a legendary mace. It has nothing to do with not being able to make a quest like that, but with any logic trying to maintain in the game. We are talking legendary's not simple questitems you can pick from a list.

    Also for people saying rogues should be somewhere down the list , the legendary wielders from last till rogues :

    Mage, Priest, Druid, Warlock, Shaman
    Paladin, Death Knight, Warrior
    Druid, Priest, Paladin, Shaman
    Hunter
    Rogue, Warrior

    Meaning all others had their legendary's since.
    If you look like class specs instead, than the common named Enha SHaman and Feral hunter could have used Sulfuras, but an assassination rogue could not have any legendary as a main weapon.

  5. #545
    Quote Originally Posted by Navitas View Post
    The problem with a tanking legendary is due to what tanks wear. (2 hander - dk, 1 hander + shield - pally/war, staff/polearm - druids *don't shoot me if this is wrong, i don't tank and it's been a long day ok :P)

    So a legendary shield = dks and druids pissed. A polearm/staff = dk/warriors/pallys are pissed, hunters would claim it (tbf hunters would claim anything). Strength anything = druids pissed (even if they can equip it'll go to a pally/warrior). Literally the only option for a tanking legendary is a trinket as all other armor has to have either strength or agility on it. Unless blizz changes it so all tanking classes use a shield then a tanking legendary is pretty hard to work into the game and still please everyone.
    Actually you seem to have forgotten that all tanks can wield either a 1h or 2h mace.

    So an easy compromise is a legendary that changes depending on who crafts it or is selectable at the end of a quest chain like Quel'Dalar.

    1h tanking mace... Warrior and Pally.
    2h str tanking mace... DK
    2h Agi tanking mace... Ferals

    Everybody wins.

  6. #546
    Blademaster Zeino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Exoticazz View Post
    People should start understand that legendary items have a big lore behind them, and that you can't just say let's make a quest and you pick any item you want from the list. If someone has been known to wield a legendary staff, and people get a quest for it to recraft it, it's a big difference changing the powers of the staff depending on the wielder , or just say well for you it will actually be a caster axe, and for the other it was actually a legendary mace. It has nothing to do with not being able to make a quest like that, but with any logic trying to maintain in the game. We are talking legendary's not simple questitems you can pick from a list.
    Too much lore talk for me. Why would the item have to be different weapon types? Couldn't it be a mace with different stats on it for different classes? Or do Stats make up some sort of the lore. If my Mace has Str on it and yours has Agi, does that mean the original wielder of mine was a warrior and the original wielder of your was a druid?

    I think you are reading WAY too far into it when it comes to this subject. On top of that, we are talking about an item that Blizz probably wont even give to "Tanks" in general. Its ridiculous because Tanks don't need that kinda thing really. Maybe just give us a fancy looking epic item that looks cool and spins then we'll be happy.

    ---------- Post added 2011-09-14 at 10:21 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Briga View Post
    So an easy compromise is a legendary that changes depending on who crafts it or is selectable at the end of a quest chain like Quel'Dalar.
    exactly what I was thinking in my original post on the subject. However, I would like to talk more about the actual legendary that is coming out and not this theoretical one we all seem to think way too much about, myself included.

  7. #547
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeino View Post
    exactly what I was thinking in my original post on the subject. However, I would like to talk more about the actual legendary that is coming out and not this theoretical one we all seem to think way too much about, myself included.
    Indeed we need rumour control with facts from blue, that the article has now been removed makes me wonder if it was genuine at all.

  8. #548
    Alright a dagger, nice. I really hope it'll be a 1.3 or 1.4 speed offhand though... It'll be a death-blow this expansion for combat spec otherwise... ... Teh gladiators is getting more and more lame, boring and just not really front page worthy. How about putting up Looking for Group for a while instead? http://www.lfgcomic.com/page/495 It at least has a STORY, and much better art.


    Quote Originally Posted by calibro View Post
    Oh god feral druids never gonna get a legendary...
    Nearly all two handers are.
    So, hand of Ragnaros is a feral druid legendary.
    Even though, at the time it dropped and was useful, it didnt have any attack rating.
    Last edited by bbr; 2011-09-14 at 05:52 PM.

  9. #549
    The Patient Photek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    A Coruña, Spain
    Posts
    316
    I really hope that thing is fake. We need legendaries that can use multiple classes. Some class-specs never had a worthy legendary before. And rogues aren't one of them.

  10. #550
    Quote Originally Posted by Xingua View Post
    Yeah, a legendary mace that had no Feral AP and couldn't proc in cat or bear form for a class that was only supposed to heal at that point in WoW....
    ^^^^^^
    this

    Everyone that's saying that ferals already got a legendary obviously did not play a druid back in vanilla.

  11. #551
    Quote Originally Posted by Photek View Post
    I really hope that thing is fake. We need legendaries that can use multiple classes. Some class-specs never had a worthy legendary before. And rogues aren't one of them.
    Mutilate Rogues never had a worthy Legendary either, if you wanna get into the class-spec arguement...

  12. #552

  13. #553
    "They might be talking about Pandas at Blizzcon."No Just No... omfg NO!

  14. #554
    I am braziliam, sry for my english.
    LFR tool raids will be easier than normal raids, and players will get different achievements and loot...
    This is ridiculous... today is very dificult get a raid (PUG), because, today is in trade: LFM BoT, link ilevel (600 minimal), and link archivement. And with new differentiation: LFM BoT, link ilevel (750 minimal), and link archievemente (dont be from LFR)... What is diferente from a LFR to a PUG ??????????? Only the form of looking for more.... Greate solution blizzard, more one racist idea. 3 ideas: 1st archievemente, 2nd ilevel, and now LFR less than normal PUG... I made many raids in WOTLK, many raids in BC, but now because i cant up more faster (work and university), and I cant do initials raids (BoT, BH, TW4 and another alphabet soup), i dont have archivements and i dont can play raid (i dont do any in cataclysm, i have 362 only from heroics).... With more this ridiculous ideia, i will like less play wow... i playing only upping any char, any realm, any class... only for fun... i doing heroics with my main only for get itens... ty and sry for my outburst.

  15. #555
    The Patient eLusion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    The Cold North
    Posts
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by Nexdominus View Post
    "They might be talking about Pandas at Blizzcon."No Just No... omfg NO!
    QQ

    10chars

  16. #556
    High Overlord BuffNinja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    132

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Nexdominus View Post
    "They might be talking about Pandas at Blizzcon."No Just No... omfg NO!
    No point QQing about pandas. There are people that like the idea and people that hate them for some (I would like to see a reason).
    Pandas will happen, it's only a matter of time...
    YOU - POOR
    ME - LEGENDARY

    Bananas are my only weakness.

  17. #557
    Quote Originally Posted by Briga View Post
    Actually you seem to have forgotten that all tanks can wield either a 1h or 2h mace.

    So an easy compromise is a legendary that changes depending on who crafts it or is selectable at the end of a quest chain like Quel'Dalar.

    1h tanking mace... Warrior and Pally.
    2h str tanking mace... DK
    2h Agi tanking mace... Ferals

    Everybody wins.
    Actually not really. Assuming they ever did what you just suggested, there would be an incredible stat advantage in favor of the 2h over the 1h.

  18. #558
    They should create a tank 2h that has shield powas! then all tanks are happy yaaay

    ---------- Post added 2011-09-14 at 09:20 PM ----------

    Everyone wants a legendary in all expansion, so when it's not their class QQ is coming, and ppl want that all classes have the same amount of legendaries, but the lore has to fit in, and caster legendaries are shared by more classes, because all ranged caster dps are most likely the same. They do the same, but they got different spells(some uses more dots than others), they all uses staffs, you can give casters 1h, but i dont see a reason only if it's the only possibility to fit in lore, like illidans weps, they cant be 2h maces right..Melee dps are different, we got 1h, slow and fast, daggers even only rogues use, 2h weapons. So the group is smaller, because melee dps are more varied.

  19. #559
    There is absolutely no way to balance the way of making legendarys that fits to multiple classes. Example the warriors had sulfuras, thunderfury, glaives, thori'dal and shadowmourne while example the enhancement shaman has nothing. I've also seen some people wanting a feral staff, but maybe you have to look a bit outside the box. The druid class just got a legendary, it wouldn't be fair if they had another one just by next patch. And they also have Fandral's Flamescythe, it might not be a legendary but it's effect is so close-up as it could possibly be. You can't satisfy everyone okay, this patch will be a rogue dagger. And rogues won't have another legendary for a very long time while the other class/spec combinations will have legendarys.

  20. #560
    Quote Originally Posted by jaymike View Post
    Actually not really. Assuming they ever did what you just suggested, there would be an incredible stat advantage in favor of the 2h over the 1h.
    Which would be balanced against warriors and paladins using a shield and the stat advantage that provides.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •