Page 31 of 47 FirstFirst ...
21
29
30
31
32
33
41
... LastLast
  1. #601
    Fluffy Kitten Marest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,246
    Sample builds updated. Most remain the same with a few tweaks here and there. If you can find one, the Pentium G2120 is still one of the best sub-$500 gaming build CPUs that together with a good discrete graphics card can offer excellent performance in most titles. For WoW (and most other MMOs) however, the i3 3220 is probably the wiser choice still.

    The 3570k remains the go-to CPU for anyone looking to build a decent-to-awesome gaming rig. SSDs are becoming more popular for each month and today they are almost common place. If you are looking to build a gaming computer for $700+, at least consider getting one. My recommendations for graphics cards are as follows:

    Budget picks: Radeon 7770, Radeon 7850, nVidia GTX 460
    Mid-range: Radeon 7870, Radeon 7950, nVidia GTX 660
    High-end: Radeon 7970 GHz Edition, nVidia GTX 660 Ti, nVidia GTX 670

    The latest drivers fixed some issues with CrossFire, but due to micro-stuttering nVidia is still the way to go for multi-GPU setups. As always, never pick two graphics card if you can achieve close to the same performance with one for roughly the same price.

  2. #602
    Quote Originally Posted by Marest View Post
    My recommendations for graphics cards are as follows:

    Budget picks: Radeon 7770, Radeon 7850, nVidia GTX 460
    Mid-range: Radeon 7870, Radeon 7950, nVidia GTX 660
    High-end: Radeon 7970 GHz Edition, nVidia GTX 660 Ti, nVidia GTX 670
    Great job on the builds, but shouldnt you put the 7950 in the high end aswell? Both pricewise and performance wise.

  3. #603
    Fluffy Kitten Marest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,246
    Perhaps. But it means very little in reality.

  4. #604
    Elemental Lord Notarget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Posts
    8,270
    I'm considering trying out this headset but so far from what I read they might even be worth considering for the suggested headset section:

    SkullCandy SLYR - $80

    Fun: 8 (Great. They really did a great job in finding a great balance between fun and balance. Very impressive for this price)

    Competitive: 7 (Good. They absolutely do their job. I'd say stereo gamers will particularly love them, kind of like how I personally see the M50s if a little better in terms of positional cues. For us virtual surround gamers, I'd still say they are worth looking into if you absolutely need a headset.)

    Comfort: 7.5 (Very good. Those with larger ears may have to use them as on ear as mentioned before, though they are still comfy in that way.)
    Review (search for SkullCandy)
    CPU: Intel i7-4790k 4.7GHz MB: ASUS Z97 Pro Gamer
    GPU: Gigabyte GTX 970 G1-Gaming 1519MHz Boost RAM: Corsair Pro 16GB 1866MHz
    SSD: Samsung 850-EVO 500GB PSU: Corsair RM550 CASE: Phanteks Enthoo Pro Monitor: 1440p Dell U2515H 1080p LG 237L-BN IPS
    Current build! ||Old Build || Bitdefender Total Security 2015 || AV-TEST 2014

  5. #605
    Legendary! Belize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Standing in the Fire, as always.
    Posts
    6,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Notarget View Post
    I'm considering trying out this headset but so far from what I read they might even be worth considering for the suggested headset section:

    SkullCandy SLYR - $80



    Review (search for SkullCandy)
    Personally, I would stay away from the big brands like Skullcandy and Razer... And Beats, for the love of god never get Beats. Usually the products are high-end but you end up paying for the brand, while something like Logitech or Steelseries would perform better at a cheaper cost.

  6. #606
    Elemental Lord Notarget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Posts
    8,270
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    Personally, I would stay away from the big brands like Skullcandy and Razer... And Beats, for the love of god never get Beats. Usually the products are high-end but you end up paying for the brand, while something like Logitech or Steelseries would perform better at a cheaper cost.
    However, did you actually read the review?
    CPU: Intel i7-4790k 4.7GHz MB: ASUS Z97 Pro Gamer
    GPU: Gigabyte GTX 970 G1-Gaming 1519MHz Boost RAM: Corsair Pro 16GB 1866MHz
    SSD: Samsung 850-EVO 500GB PSU: Corsair RM550 CASE: Phanteks Enthoo Pro Monitor: 1440p Dell U2515H 1080p LG 237L-BN IPS
    Current build! ||Old Build || Bitdefender Total Security 2015 || AV-TEST 2014

  7. #607
    TOTALLY NOT
    Banned
    tetrisGOAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    13,318
    Skullcandy has proven themselves wanting to penetrate the premium segments with some success, like the Aviat..or?
    Either way, I'd take anything Head-fi with a grain of salt.

  8. #608
    Elemental Lord Notarget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Posts
    8,270
    Without having any real proof of course it seems the guy knows what he is talking about considering all the reviews, comparisons etc.
    CPU: Intel i7-4790k 4.7GHz MB: ASUS Z97 Pro Gamer
    GPU: Gigabyte GTX 970 G1-Gaming 1519MHz Boost RAM: Corsair Pro 16GB 1866MHz
    SSD: Samsung 850-EVO 500GB PSU: Corsair RM550 CASE: Phanteks Enthoo Pro Monitor: 1440p Dell U2515H 1080p LG 237L-BN IPS
    Current build! ||Old Build || Bitdefender Total Security 2015 || AV-TEST 2014

  9. #609
    Warchief Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,174
    marest u should replace the msi 7970 lightning with the msi gtx 680 lightning.
    Milk was a bad choice.

    2013 MMO-Champion User of the Year (2nd runner up)

  10. #610
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    marest u should replace the msi 7970 lightning with the msi gtx 680 lightning.
    ...For what reason?

  11. #611
    Warchief Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Drunkenvalley View Post
    ...For what reason?
    its a better card
    Milk was a bad choice.

    2013 MMO-Champion User of the Year (2nd runner up)

  12. #612
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    its a better card
    According to what benchmark? Can you think of any actual reason that qualifies it as better?

  13. #613
    Warchief Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Drunkenvalley View Post
    According to what benchmark? Can you think of any actual reason that qualifies it as better?
    yes i do

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/M...htning/33.html

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/M...htning/33.html
    Milk was a bad choice.

    2013 MMO-Champion User of the Year (2nd runner up)

  14. #614

  15. #615
    Warchief Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by DeltrusDisc View Post
    So... a $100 price increase... for what, exactly?
    which price increase?

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814127693
    Milk was a bad choice.

    2013 MMO-Champion User of the Year (2nd runner up)

  16. #616
    You just said literally fuckall. "Yes I do"? Yes you do what? Have benchmarks? You don't compare them. Neither do they. Your sources literally have no connection off the bat that tells me anything remotely useful, nor give any reason why the 680 version of the card is better than the 7970.

  17. #617
    I am Murloc! Cyanotical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,492
    it's actually rather simple, if you plan on doing a multi card setup, get the 680, if not, get the 7970

    i7-4790K | Z97 Class. | 8GB DDR3-2133 | GTX-980 | RAIDR | 512GB Samsung 830 | SuperNOVA 1Kw P2 | RV05
    Dell U3415w | Ducky Shine3 YoS | EVGA Torq X5 | Xonar Essence One | KRK RP8G2s

  18. #618
    Warchief Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the mountains
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Drunkenvalley View Post
    You just said literally fuckall. "Yes I do"? Yes you do what? Have benchmarks? You don't compare them. Neither do they. Your sources literally have no connection off the bat that tells me anything remotely useful, nor give any reason why the 680 version of the card is better than the 7970.
    msi gtx 680 - 9.8 rating
    msi 7970 - 8.0 rating

    ---------- Post added 2013-01-10 at 11:31 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyanotical View Post
    it's actually rather simple, if you plan on doing a multi card setup, get the 680, if not, get the 7970
    can u explain why? i dont think the extra 1gb on the 7970 really does much
    Milk was a bad choice.

    2013 MMO-Champion User of the Year (2nd runner up)

  19. #619
    The Insane DeltrusDisc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    15,770
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    Okay.

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/618?vs=555

    Why?

    He has the GTX 600s dominating in almost all the other builds. Frankly, however, the 7970 GHz Lightning is pretty damn good. Not to mention is has more VRAM natively and a bigger membus, takes less power both at load and idle... Also it supports 6 monitors.

    I think what Marest really wants from you, is to provide cold hard evidence and reasoning to switch them.

  20. #620
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post
    msi gtx 680 - 9.8 rating
    msi 7970 - 8.0 rating
    If you are basing your entire opinion on these two numbers I can't take you seriously, sorry.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •