Judge Approves Activision Blizzard's $18 Million Settlement with the EEOC
U.S. District Judge Dale Fischer has approved the $18m settlement between Activision Blizzard and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, bringing this federal sexual harassment lawsuit to an end.

  • Anyone who worked at Activision Blizzard starting on September 1, 2016 can submit a claim for compensation.
  • EEOC's lawsuit is just one of many lawsuits that the company has faced for its workplace culture.
  • Activision Blizzard continues to face lawsuits filled by other former employees and the DFEH (California Department of Fair Employment and Housing).
  • The judge denied DFEH's intervention in the EEOC lawsuit, and claimants that apply to receive money from the EEOC settlement will waive any rights to any monetary relief provided by the DFEH lawsuit.
  • Activision Blizzard continues to face an investigation by the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) over its handling of sexual misconduct allegations.

Originally Posted by Activision Blizzard
SANTA MONICA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Mar. 29, 2022-- This morning the federal court indicated it would approve Activision Blizzard’s (Nasdaq: ATVI) settlement with the EEOC today. That settlement paves the way to compensate and make amends to eligible claimants.

“The agreement we reached with the EEOC last year reflected our unwavering commitment to ensure a safe and equitable working environment for all employees,” said Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick. “Our goal is to make Activision Blizzard a model for the industry, and we will continue to focus on eliminating harassment and discrimination from our workplace. The court’s approval of this settlement is an important step in ensuring that our employees have mechanisms for recourse if they experienced any form of harassment or retaliation.”

As part of the agreement with the EEOC, Activision agreed to:

  • Create an $18 million fund to compensate eligible claimants.
  • Continue enhancing policies, practices, and training to prevent harassment and discrimination in the workplace, including by implementing an expanded performance-review system. These improvements are underway.
  • Engage a neutral, third-party equal employment opportunity consultant – a non-employee who must be approved by the EEOC – who will provide ongoing oversight of the Company’s compliance with the agreement. This independent consultant’s findings will be reported directly to the EEOC and Activision Blizzard’s Board of Directors.
  • Hire an internal EEO coordinator with relevant experience in gender discrimination, harassment, and related retaliation to assist the Company. Stacy Jackson began this position on March 16.

Today’s milestones come as Activision continues to enhance its workplace culture. Activision has already taken the following steps:

  • Developed a new zero-tolerance policy on harassment and retaliation company-wide;
  • Quadrupled the size of its Ethics & Compliance team, adding a VP of Ethics and Compliance, a Senior Director of Investigations, a Senior Manager of Ethics & Compliance Analytics & Assessments, a Director of Ethics and Compliance Investigations and Third Party Risk Management, two Directors of Workplace Investigations, and two Directors of Ethics who support training initiatives and our Way2Play Heroes, who are employee volunteers who help others understand reporting options, champion speaking up, and advise leadership on how to strengthen our overall ethics and compliance program;
  • Significantly increased investment in related training;
  • Enhanced transparency with new reporting on pay equity and diversity representation;
  • Contributed $1 million to WIGI to advance the success of women in the global games industry;
  • Waived required arbitration for individual sexual harassment and discrimination claims for claims arising out of events after October 28, 2021;
  • Launched a new tool that tracks–for every single hire–data on the representation and presence of women and underrepresented ethnic group candidates at applicant, interview, and hiring stages of our recruiting process. This tool will enable us to provide transparency on our diversity progress as well as helping to reinforce our objective of having diverse candidate slates for open positions;
  • Developed stricter alcohol policies company-wide;
  • Recently launched Your Upward Feedback program, which facilitated more than 90% of our managers receiving personal feedback;
  • Launched Level Up U, a paid training program designed to teach participants game development and prepare successful program participants for engineering roles within the Company.

In addition, in October 2021, Activision set a goal of increasing the representation of women and non-binary employees by 50% in the next five years. It also has committed to invest $250 million over the next 10 years in initiatives that foster expanded opportunities in gaming and technology for under-represented communities.

“We are gratified that the federal court that reviewed our settlement with the EEOC is finding that it is ‘fair, reasonable and adequate and advance(s) the public interest.’ The Court’s approval is a vital step in our journey to ensuring that everyone at Activision Blizzard always feels safe, heard and empowered. We hope the court’s findings – including its view that many of the objections raised about our settlement were inaccurate and speculative – will dispel any confusion that may exist. With all of the terms of the settlement reviewed and approved, we can move forward,” Kotick concluded.
This article was originally published in forum thread: Judge Approves Activision Blizzard's $18 Million Settlement with the EEOC started by Lumy View original post
Comments 129 Comments
  1. Alicianna's Avatar
    Considering how much Bobby gets when he leaves the company... this should be the April joke.
  1. Thanatu's Avatar
    "Activision set a goal of increasing the representation of women and non-binary employees by 50% in the next five years." Rip to good employees they do have they will need to fire to achieve this. Also rip to quality limiting who they can hire from fitting that model. Heres to hoping they find amazing people to fill those roles with that restriction.
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Gadzooks View Post
    "Misandry"? Really? LAWL.

    Tell us how you post "women being allowed to work was a bad idea" on 4chan, without telling us you post that kind of crap on 4chan regularly.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gadzooks View Post
    It's be expected. There's a lot of "gamers" who think and demand that gaming, and other industries like tech should be a "Girls not allowed" clubhouse. You see them mostly on forums like 4chan losing their tiny little minds over the idea of a woman doing anything but being a sex and sammich dispensing Real Doll for them. Some of them think allowing women to vote was a bad idea. But they're ridiculous little spuds, aren't they? And curiously, have no women in their lives. Odd how that works.
    Yep, you sure sound objective.

    Sorry to disappoint your preconceived ideas about me (gosh, if only there was a word for that concept), but I don't even read 4chan, let alone post there.
  1. Gadzooks's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanoro View Post
    Yep, you sure sound objective.

    Sorry to disappoint your preconceived ideas about me (gosh, if only there was a word for that concept), but I don't even read 4chan, let alone post there.
    Sure, Jan.
  1. Djaye's Avatar
    this is funny as hell. isnt this like not even 10% of what BK makes as an annual bonus? im sure AE/blizz learned their lesson. rofl. pathetic
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Gadzooks View Post
    Sure, Jan.
    Thought this might be a variant of the "ok boomer" crap. Let's see:

    "Sure, Jan" is used when you can easily read a family or friend for the filthy liar they are. You say it when you obviously know they are lying but you don't want to call them out in front of everyone.

    Ah. So you're misandrist and a passive aggressive coward, and still wrong about me, but hey, you do you, just keep on applying stereotypes when you disagree, completely failing to see your own hypocrisy.
  1. uuuhname's Avatar
    simply incredible; even in the face of documented company wide misogamy the "gamers" (TM)(C)(R) still mange to convince themselves they're somehow the real victims here, of misandry. omg someone said something vaguely disparaging about the gamers, what has society come to!?
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by uuuhname View Post
    simply incredible; even in the face of documented company wide misogamy the "gamers" (TM)(C)(R) still mange to convince themselves they're somehow the real victims here, of misandry. omg someone said something vaguely disparaging about the gamers, what has society come to!?
    You expect to gain support from people by insulting them?
  1. uuuhname's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanoro View Post
    You expect to gain support from people by insulting them?
    fucking lmao, I don't expect jack shit from "gamers". all they're good for in these situations is highlighting how incapable they are of pulling their heads from their asses. the constant mindset from them since GG has been: " I don't care how much people have to suffer and how objectively shitty the people who make the things I like are, so long as they continue to please me, myself, and I, that's all I care about."
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by uuuhname View Post
    fucking lmao, I don't expect jack shit from "gamers". all they're good for in these situations is highlighting how incapable they are of pulling their heads from their asses.
    Then what exactly is your purpose posting on a video games forum?
  1. uuuhname's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanoro View Post
    Then what exactly is your purpose posting on a video games forum?
    because I play games and care about the well being of the people who make the things I enjoy. simple as.
  1. Relapses's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by The Vindicator View Post
    Exactly. I understand why there is need for these types of initiatives but people don't go into fields equally - the reason so many white dudes make games is because so many white dudes want to do that; bringing in people not necessarily the best for the job just because of skin color or sex is patronising to them and bodes ill for consumers, and ultimately the company. It's an extremely stupid idea
    Good thing that's not what is happening then. Increasing the scope of potential hires beyond just those who apply to "vidya games," is one of the first steps. It isn't exclusionary -- white dudes will still get the job if they're the right person for it -- it just means their hiring pool will be more diverse.
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by uuuhname View Post
    because I play games and care about the well being of the people who make the things I enjoy. simple as.
    George Orwell was a prophet.
  1. Gadzooks's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanoro View Post
    Thought this might be a variant of the "ok boomer" crap. Let's see:

    "Sure, Jan" is used when you can easily read a family or friend for the filthy liar they are. You say it when you obviously know they are lying but you don't want to call them out in front of everyone.

    Ah. So you're misandrist and a passive aggressive coward, and still wrong about me, but hey, you do you, just keep on applying stereotypes when you disagree, completely failing to see your own hypocrisy.
    You're trying so hard, "He doth protest too much" is mandatory now.
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    Good thing that's not what is happening then. Increasing the scope of potential hires beyond just those who apply to "vidya games," is one of the first steps. It isn't exclusionary -- white dudes will still get the job if they're the right person for it -- it just means their hiring pool will be more diverse.
    Except they're not "increasing the scope of potential hires", they're setting quotas based on skin and genitals. If anything, they're setting an artificial limit on their scope. I don't expect you to understand that or why such policies are ridiculously racist and sexist.
  1. uuuhname's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanoro View Post
    George Orwell was a prophet.
    LMFAO, ya'll are such snowflakes, and invoking George Orwell incorrectly to boot.
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Gadzooks View Post
    You're trying so hard, "He doth protest too much" is mandatory now.
    Or you're just trying to demonize your opponents with unprovable accusations since you have no arguments.
  1. uuuhname's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanoro View Post
    Or you're just trying to demonize your opponents with unprovable accusations since you have no arguments.
    the guy didn't quote you, he didn't call you out by name, you took him talking about "gamers" personally. because as the saying goes: a hit dog hollers.
  1. Relapses's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanoro View Post
    Except they're not "increasing the scope of potential hires", they're setting quotas based on skin and genitals. If anything, they're setting an artificial limit on their scope. I don't expect you to understand that or why such policies are ridiculously racist and sexist.
    Can you please explain where they said there were quotas? They said they're committed to doubling representation. That doesn't mean there's a quota. That just means they're going to try to increase representation.
  1. Feanoro's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by uuuhname View Post
    the guy didn't quote you, he didn't call you out by name, you took him talking about "gamers" personally. because as the saying goes: a hit dog hollers.
    So your logic is people only speak if they take something personally. What an incredibly naive and narrow minded view. Perhaps you two should talk, you'll enjoy the echo chamber.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    Can you please explain where they said there were quotas? They said they're committed to doubling representation. That doesn't mean there's a quota. That just means they're going to try to increase representation.
    You honestly don't understand how setting a number like that is a quota?

Site Navigation