Microsoft Activision Blizzard Deal Gets Preliminary Approval From UK's CMA
UK's Competition and Markets Authority has announced that the new sale of Activision's cloud gaming rights to Ubisoft substantially addresses previous concerns and opens the door to the deal being cleared.
Originally Posted by CMA
While the CMA has identified limited residual concerns with the new deal, Microsoft has put forward remedies which the CMA has provisionally concluded should address these issues.

The CMA is now consulting on the remedies before making a final decision.

The new deal

Earlier this year, the CMA blocked Microsoft from acquiring the whole of Activision due to concerns that the deal would harm competition in cloud gaming in the UK. After that deal was blocked, Microsoft submitted a restructured transaction in August for the CMA to review.

Under that new deal, Microsoft will not purchase the cloud gaming rights held by Activision, which will instead be sold to an independent third party, Ubisoft Entertainment SA (Ubisoft), before the deal is completed.

The prior sale of the cloud gaming rights will establish Ubisoft as a key supplier of content to cloud gaming services, replicating the role that Activision would have played in the market as an independent player.

In contrast to the original deal, Microsoft will no longer control cloud gaming rights for Activision’s content, so would not be in a position to limit access to Activision’s key content to its own cloud gaming service or to withhold those games from rivals. Unlike the remedies the CMA previously rejected, Ubisoft will be free to offer Activision’s games both directly to consumers and to all cloud gaming service providers however it chooses, including for buy-to-play or multigame subscription services, or any new model for providing content that might emerge as the market develops. The deal with Ubisoft also requires Microsoft to port Activision games to operating systems other than Windows and support game emulators when requested, addressing the other main shortcoming with the previous remedies package.

Today’s decision

The CMA considers that the restructured deal makes important changes that substantially address the concerns it set out in relation to the original transaction earlier this year.

In particular, the sale of Activision’s cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft will prevent this important content – including games such as Call of Duty, Overwatch, and World of Warcraft – from coming under the control of Microsoft in relation to cloud gaming. The CMA originally found that Microsoft already has a strong position in cloud gaming services and could have used its control over Activision content to stifle competition and reinforce this position. The new deal instead results in the cloud streaming rights for Activision’s games being transferred to an independent player, Ubisoft, maintaining open competition as the market for cloud gaming develops over the coming years.

While the restructured deal is materially different to the previous transaction and substantially addresses most concerns, the CMA has limited residual concerns that certain provisions in the sale of Activision’s cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft could be circumvented, terminated, or not enforced.

To address these concerns, Microsoft has offered remedies to ensure that the terms of the sale of Activision’s rights to Ubisoft are enforceable by the CMA. The CMA has provisionally concluded that this additional protection should resolve those residual concerns.

The CMA has now opened a consultation, until 6 October, on Microsoft’s proposed remedies.

Colin Raftery, senior director of mergers and Phase 1 decision maker, said:

“This is a new and substantially different deal, which keeps the cloud distribution of these important games in the hands of a strong independent supplier, Ubisoft, rather than under the control of Microsoft.”

“With additional protections to make sure that the deal is properly implemented, this will maintain the structure of the market, enabling open competition to continue to shape the development of cloud gaming in the years to come, and giving UK gamers the opportunity to access Activision’s games in many different ways, including through cloud-based multigame subscription services.”

Sarah Cardell, CEO of the CMA, said:

“The CMA’s position has been consistent throughout – this merger could only go ahead if competition, innovation, and choice in cloud gaming was preserved. In response to our original prohibition, Microsoft has now substantially restructured the deal, taking the necessary steps to address our original concerns.

“It would have been far better, though, if Microsoft had put forward this restructure during our original investigation. This case illustrates the costs, uncertainty and delay that parties can incur if a credible and effective remedy option exists but is not put on the table at the right time.”



Key Takeaways:
  • UK's CMA preliminarily approves the sale of Activision's cloud gaming rights to Ubisoft.
  • Under the new deal, Microsoft will not control the cloud gaming rights for Activision's content, in order to ensure fair competition from rivals.
  • Microsoft will be required to support game emulators and port Activision games to non-Windows platforms when requested.
  • The CMA considers this restructured deal as substantially addressing competition concerns.
  • A consultation period for Microsoft's proposed remedies is open until October 6th.

Following the news, Microsoft Vice Chair and President Brad Smith shared on Twitter (X) that the company is happy with today's response from the CMA (Competition and Markets Authority).


Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick sent a message to employees, expressing his gratitude for their dedication and highlighting the significant milestone of the merger's preliminary approval by the UK's CMA.
Originally Posted by Bobby Kotick
Team,

I want to share an important update on our planned merger with Microsoft.

Today the UK regulatory authority, the CMA, issued a preliminary approval of our merger with Microsoft based on the solutions Microsoft presented in connection with its new merger application. This approval is critical to completing our merger.

The next step is for the CMA to gather third-party feedback, after which the CMA will reach a final decision.

As I said when we announced the deal, this transaction will help us accelerate our ambitions for the future of gaming and enable us to better serve our players. Microsoft recognizes the commitment to excellence and creative independence that has served us well for the last 30 years. I am confident that their resources, technology, and tools will provide us even greater opportunities to create even better games.

This is a significant milestone for the merger and a testament to our solutions-oriented work with regulators. I remain optimistic as we continue the journey toward completion and am very grateful to each of you for your dedication and focus throughout this process.

As the regulators continue their process, I will keep you updated on our progress towards our expected closing.

With gratitude,

Bobby
This article was originally published in forum thread: Microsoft Activision Blizzard Deal Gets Preliminary Approval From UK's CMA started by Lumy View original post
Comments 79 Comments
  1. Relapses's Avatar
    inb4 WoW on GamePass.
  1. Onikaroshi's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    inb4 WoW on GamePass.
    Eh, wow won't be (eso still isn't) but everything else is likely
  1. Relapses's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Onikaroshi View Post
    Eh, wow won't be (eso still isn't) but everything else is likely
    Easy solution: "MMO tier" added to GamePass that's 10 bucks more than the normal GP sub. Now they can market that the WoW subscription is "$5/mo cheaper" (assuming you paid for both separately prior to the merger) while still making hand-over-fist with subscription income.
  1. Inoculate's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    Easy solution: "MMO tier" added to GamePass that's 10 bucks more than the normal GP sub. Now they can market that the WoW subscription is "$5/mo cheaper" (assuming you paid for both separately prior to the merger) while still making hand-over-fist with subscription income.
    This makes my heart sad, because it's probably what will happen.

    What aspect of our lives will Microsoft not exploit?
  1. oldgeezer's Avatar
    Maybe the Mac battle.net app, the buggiest POS Blizzard have ever produced, will finally get fixed.

    If you like multiple runaway processes, bad permissions and Gb-sized memory leaks you'll love it!
  1. unfilteredJW's Avatar
    And everyone but Microsoft and Activision loses.
  1. Mastacow's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    inb4 WoW on GamePass.
    They won't put in the money or time to do this. WoW is in a state where they put as little time into it as possible.
  1. Albertillo's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Mastacow View Post
    They won't put in the money or time to do this. WoW is in a state where they put as little time into it as possible.
    Have you even played dragonflight?
    If you think they don't want to put time to wow after playing it then you're just a troll/hater.

    If they do put WoW on game pass I'm sure a lot of new player will come. I don't know what they would do for expansion prices though.
  1. Tharkkun's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    inb4 WoW on GamePass.
    Only if Ubisoft permits it.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by unfilteredJW View Post
    And everyone but Microsoft and Activision loses.
    I don't really get this POV. Microsoft has a level of standards equal to when Blizzard was on top. Call of Duty franchise needs this quality applied to itself as well.
  1. sensei's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by unfilteredJW View Post
    And everyone but Microsoft and Activision loses.
    Why do people keep pretending Playstation doesn't have a stranglehold on the gaming industry.
  1. The-Shan's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by unfilteredJW View Post
    And everyone but Microsoft and Activision loses.
    that's right, shareholders win. Companies have a fiduciary responsibility to look after shareholders and thats what they did. They only need to keep you happy to get your money. Beyond that, it's all about profit.
  1. Onikaroshi's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Tharkkun View Post
    Only if Ubisoft permits it.
    They sold cloud gaming to Ubi, Gamepass mostly ISN'T cloud gaming

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by unfilteredJW View Post
    And everyone but Microsoft and Activision loses.
    more games on gamepass = a win in my book
  1. Tech614's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    Easy solution: "MMO tier" added to GamePass that's 10 bucks more than the normal GP sub. Now they can market that the WoW subscription is "$5/mo cheaper" (assuming you paid for both separately prior to the merger) while still making hand-over-fist with subscription income.
    Game pass adds base games, not any services past that. No DLC, subs, battle passes or expansions.

    It will be the same as ESO. The base WoW game will go up on gamepass but you will still need to sub and buy xpacs. There isn't going to be some tier added just for WoW, the most that would ever come out of this is MS funding an Xbox port of WoW.
  1. Stormwolf64's Avatar
    I don't care, be done with it so that i don't have to keep reading about this shitty purchase i don't care about
  1. arkanon's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Onikaroshi View Post
    Eh, wow won't be (eso still isn't) but everything else is likely
    ESO is on gamepass on console iirc.
  1. Tech614's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by arkanon View Post
    ESO is on gamepass on console iirc.
    Just the base game. Same will likely be true of WoW eventually. That doesn't include sub or most recent xpac in the case of ESO, and likely won't for WoW either.
  1. Albertillo's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Tech614 View Post
    Game pass adds base games, not any services past that. No DLC, subs, battle passes or expansions.

    It will be the same as ESO. The base WoW game will go up on gamepass but you will still need to sub and buy xpacs. There isn't going to be some tier added just for WoW, the most that would ever come out of this is MS funding an Xbox port of WoW.
    That wouldn't make sense. WoW base game is already free. You can play until lvl 20. Adding it to game pass but needing extra sub wouldn't make sense. I suppose the would include the sub in the game pass and you would have to pay for each expansion only
  1. Relapses's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Tech614 View Post
    Just the base game. Same will likely be true of WoW eventually. That doesn't include sub or most recent xpac in the case of ESO, and likely won't for WoW either.
    In one of the recently leaked Microsoft merger documents they cited an anticipation of 100 million GamePass subscribers by 2030. I don't see a world where GamePass achieves that kind of subscription saturation without in some way co-opting WoW's subscription and new expansions. The model is simply way, way too lucrative for a profit-hungry multinational corporation to pass up.
  1. yuyang1shi's Avatar
    Bye Boby Kotick, it's the time to piss off.
  1. Tech614's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Albertillo View Post
    That wouldn't make sense. WoW base game is already free. You can play until lvl 20. Adding it to game pass but needing extra sub wouldn't make sense. I suppose the would include the sub in the game pass and you would have to pay for each expansion only
    WoW base game includes up through shadowlands, not level 20. You are confusing free trial and base game, base game is always everything except the most recent xpac. That haven't sold old xpacs alone in how many years? It's been awhile, you sound like a time traveler from 2010 or something.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Relapses View Post
    In one of the recently leaked Microsoft merger documents they cited an anticipation of 100 million GamePass subscribers by 2030. I don't see a world where GamePass achieves that kind of subscription saturation without in some way co-opting WoW's subscription and new expansions. The model is simply way, way too lucrative for a profit-hungry multinational corporation to pass up.
    Are you honestly unironically saying WoW is even going to move a needle in turning 25 million gamepass subs into 100 million? lol. This post wasn't serious right? WoW doesn't move the needle for gamepass at all, it just lights money on fire. If it was financially viable to have an MMO sub and xpacs on gamepass ESO would of gotten that treatment 3 years ago when the bethesda deal closed.

    The entire gamepass model is based around giving you base games that if you want more than the base game you have to pony up for the mtx, subs, battle passes or xpacs. It is running on single digit profitability according to the recent FTC leaks. Just putting WoW on it would make it already be running at a massive deficit even if only a very small % of WoW subs actually moved to gamepass instead of traditional.

    Oh and spoiler alert, they won't have 100 million subs by 2030, or anywhere even close to that. Gamepass growth already stagnated after that data which is from 2020 and Phil Spencer even said as much.

Site Navigation