Build of the Month
Recent Blue Posts
Feedback: Death Knight Updates
Feedback: Death Knight Updates
Recent Forum Posts
The War Within Alpha - Warbands Feature Overview
The latest PTR build added items to Zul'gurub and Zul'aman and we now have a pretty good idea of what will drop there.
- No screenshots for the moment, models aren't implemented yet.
- The list might not be final, especially because it's incredibly annoying to scan for items in the current PTR build.
| Level | Type | Spec | Slot | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 353 | Axe | Melee | Two-Hand | Reforged Trollbane |
| 353 | Back | Melee | Back | Hex Lord's Bloody Cloak |
| 353 | Back | Physical DPS | Back | Recovered Cloak of Frostheim |
| 353 | Back | Spell DPS | Back | Hakkari Loa Drape |
| 353 | Bow | Physical DPS | Ranged | Mandokir's Tribute |
| 353 | Bow | Tank | Ranged | Voodoo Hunting Bow |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell DPS | Feet | Boots of the Ursine |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell DPS | Legs | Serpentine Leggings |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell DPS | Shoulder | Jan'alai's Spaulders |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell DPS | Waist | Sash of Anguish |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell DPS | Wrist | Wristwraps of Madness |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell Spirit | Chest | Hexing Robes |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell Spirit | Head | The Hexxer's Mask |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell Spirit | Shoulder | Claw-Fringe Mantle |
| 353 | Cloth | Spell Spirit | Wrist | Wristwraps of Departed Spirits |
| 353 | Dagger | Physical DPS | One-Hand | Twinblade of the Hakkari |
| 353 | Dagger | Spell DPS | One-Hand | Voodoo Hexblade |
| 353 | Finger | Melee | Finger | Ring of the Numberless Brood |
| 353 | Finger | Physical DPS | Finger | Arlokk's Signet |
| 353 | Finger | Spell DPS | Finger | Shimmerclaw Band |
| 353 | Finger | Spell DPS | Finger | Signet of Venoxis |
| 353 | Finger | Spell Spirit | Finger | Soul Drain Signet |
| 353 | Fist Weap. | Physical DPS | One-Hand | Thekal's Claws |
| 353 | Fist Weap. | Physical DPS | One-Hand | Arlokk's Claws |
| 353 | Leather | Melee | Feet | Fasc's Preserved Sandals |
| 353 | Leather | Melee | Head | The Savager's Mask |
| 353 | Leather | Melee | Legs | Leggings of Dancing Blades |
| 353 | Leather | Melee | Wrist | Amani'shi Belt |
| 353 | Leather | Physical DPS | Chest | Shadowtooth Trollskin Breastplate |
| 353 | Leather | Physical DPS | Waist | Belt of Slithering Serpents |
| 353 | Leather | Spell DPS | Chest | Vestments of the Soulflayer |
| 353 | Leather | Spell DPS | Feet | Two-Toed Moccasins |
| 353 | Leather | Spell Spirit | Legs | Leggings of the Pride |
| 353 | Leather | Spell Spirit | Wrist | Armbands of the Bear Spirit |
| 353 | Mace | Melee | Two-Hand | Jeklik's Smasher |
| 353 | Mace | Spell Spirit | One-Hand | Amani Scepter of Rites |
| 353 | Physical DPS | Hands | Handguards of the Tormented | |
| 353 | Physical DPS | Head | Headdress of Sharpened Vision | |
| 353 | Physical DPS | Legs | Zombie Walker Legguards | |
| 353 | Physical DPS | Shoulder | Pauldrons of Nalorakk | |
| 353 | Physical DPS | Waist | Waistband of Hexes | |
| 353 | Spell DPS | Waist | Hawkscale Waistguard | |
| 353 | Spell DPS | Wrist | Shadowmender Wristguards | |
| 353 | Spell Spirit | Chest | Breastplate of Serenity | |
| 353 | Spell Spirit | Hands | Mojo-Mender's Gloves | |
| 353 | Spell Spirit | Legs | Kilt of Forgotten Rites | |
| 353 | Spell Spirit | Shoulder | Spiritbinder Spaulders | |
| 353 | Neck | Physical DPS | Neck | Amulet of the Watcher |
| 353 | Neck | Tank | Neck | Amulet of Protection |
| 353 | Off-Hand | Spell Spirit | Off-Hand | Lost Bag of Whammies |
| 353 | Plate | Melee | Chest | Chestplate of Hubris |
| 353 | Plate | Melee | Feet | Skullcrusher Warboots |
| 353 | Plate | Melee | Hands | Plunderer's Gauntlets |
| 353 | Plate | Melee | Head | Roaring Mask of Bethekk |
| 353 | Plate | Melee | Legs | Jungle Striders |
| 353 | Plate | Melee | Wrist | Deathcharged Wristguards |
| 353 | Plate | Spell Spirit | Chest | Troll Skull Chestplate |
| 353 | Plate | Spell Spirit | Feet | Boots of Bad Mojo |
| 353 | Plate | Spell Spirit | Head | Plumed Medicine Helm |
| 353 | Plate | Tank | Chest | Battleplate of the Amani Empire |
| 353 | Plate | Tank | Hands | Bone Plate Handguards |
| 353 | Plate | Tank | Head | Spiritshield Mask |
| 353 | Plate | Tank | Shoulder | Pauldrons of Sacrifice |
| 353 | Plate | Tank | Waist | Coils of Hate |
| 353 | Shield | Spell DPS | Off Hand | Zulian Ward |
| 353 | Shield | Tank | Off Hand | Shield of the Blood God |
| 353 | Staff | Spell DPS | Two-Hand | Legacy of Arlokk |
| 353 | Sword | Melee | One-Hand | Zulian Slasher |
| 353 | Sword | Melee | One-Hand | Renataki's Soul Slicer |
| 353 | Sword | Tank | One-Hand | Bloodlord's Protector |
| 353 | Wand | Spell DPS | Ranged | Touch of Discord |
| 353 | Wand | Spell DPS | Ranged | Zulian Voodoo Stick |
| 70 | Mount | Amani Battle Bear |
Blue Posts
I guess we finally know why Ghostcrawler is gone from the forums: we can blame the europeans (but not me) and the whiners who don't take the time of reading posts when they come from a blue tracker. There, that's why the daily classes update are gone, but now we have super fast updates to patches hotfixes!
Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Why Ghostcrawler stopped posting on official forums
These forums have always been about players talking to players. We don't want to foster the expectation that it's going to get a blue response if someone tries hard enough (lol I'm replying to a thread calling for a blue). While GC added a lot to these forums (and I say 'these forums' because he only posted in the North America forums) we think we can reach more players, particularly those in other regions, more directly through the blogs, or concerted Q&A's. Blogs also tend to be a better medium for getting the message out there loud and clear, but does have downsides that it removes the conversation that we know is appreciated quite a bit.
While forum posts do lend themselves to that conversational approach, they actually have a lot of downsides to them from our perspective of attempting to get clear and clean information to the players. They aren't very visible is really the first and maybe biggest problem. You can liken forum posts and the information given in them to some of the displeasure surrounding how hotfixes are communicated. I may reply to a thread 20 times and in my #13 reply I say something really important regarding class balance. Who is going to see that? How quickly will that knowledge actually permeate? Will the message be kept clear? Will my clarification in post #17 that explains what people are misunderstanding in #13 be seen by everyone that read #13? People tend not to read past the first blue post in a thread, or skip around and don't read them all, so if you have a correction/addendum to the first post, or just expound upon a thought, it's generally lost on the majority of readers. Blue trackers can help with this, but we're generally not having to explain that "post #13 wasn't the end of the thought and it's being taken out of context" to people who just go to blue trackers. Forum posts also tend to be fairly quickly written by one of us without much in the way of peer-review, and anything written off-the-cuff like a reply to a thread can tend to be more precarious than a more substantive outlet that has an official process of review and correction before its posted (like the blogs). Much to the dismay of many forum goers I'm sure, there's just an infinitely smaller chance we'll say something stupid or mess up in a fully published blog post.
As with anything we do, we never believe we're perfect. There's always room to improve. The blogs may not be the best outlet but we're continually working to improve upon the content we're delivering, and have some pretty exciting stuff planned. We're also working to make the comment system for the blogs a bit more like the forums so conversation can be held there more easily, as well. Of course you've no doubt see we're running a recurring global Ask the Devs Q&A. It's one way where we're hoping to fill that gap of direct developer interaction that the blogs probably just can't hit. We think the Q&A's are going to be extremely popular and fill a big part of what made GC's interactions on here so useful. And we’re going to continue collecting feedback and posting when appropriate, but we'll also be trying to come up with additional ways to facilitate the communication between the developers and players. (Source)
Recycling content in future patches
There definitely is not a hard and fast rule about updating existing content. If we feel revamping existing content makes sense in the current state of the game and lore -- and we think it will be fun -- sure, it's a possibility. You definitely shouldn't expect this every patch though. In the grand scheme of World of Warcraft's history, we've reintroduced very little existing content per patch and expansion. (Source)
And let's get real - we know why you're recycling old content. With the next Starcraft 2 expansion, Diablo 3, and an "unannounced MMO" all in production, I'm guessing the art team has its hands full. Recycling old content is an easy way to create a "new" instance with old art assets.
There isn't a singular Blizzard Entertainment art team. Each franchise has its own art department. We don't just pull resources from one project to give more attention to another in the sense you're suggesting. This is why we have multiple development teams (which include art teams for each) and can work on multiple franchises simultaneously. (Source)
"OMG ALL THE DEVS ARE GONE!"
That wasn't at all the context of the post to which I was responded. That player was suggesting that a singular art team directs their attention away from WoW to work on art for our other games. That's not true.
Now, if an individual person does move onto a new project, their position is filled. Therefore, the resources are still there (which is why I said "in the sense you're suggesting"). This is how career advancement works at any company. How else do you account for a company's growth? You bring in new talent (or move them up from within the company) and train them under the current folks so they can eventually fill the vacancy.
This talk about losing WoW developers, or that WoW is left to a "B team" is getting tiresome. There is no finite pool of talent and we have every intention of making sure WoW development remains very strong.
All of this is practically besides the point anyway. All you've been told is some talented people who helped build WoW into what it is today have moved over to another project to help bring it to fruition. You don't know who those people are, what positions they held on the WoW team, or how many of them have moved onto other projects. Most of them, in fact, are programmers working to develop the systems and tech for a new project. And the programmers WoW has now are amazing. They've taken the original systems and improved upon them many times over.
Just as an example, think back to how slowly UI improvements would be implemented in vanilla and TBC. Now there are scores of great UI improvements nearly every patch. That team is incredible and very experienced. Just the same, the class design team has hardly changed in years, save for a couple of additions (read: not subtractions).
Every department at Blizzard has expanded immensely over the years to accommodate the growing playerbase, as well as our ambitions for the future of the company. You can look at our job opportunities page just to get an example for the talent search we have constantly going on.
Bringing in new talent and growing the company from within is far from a bad thing. It's a great thing and has allowed us to develop several projects simultaneously without short-changing any of them. Anyone who says otherwise is working on an incredible amount of speculation and assumptions.
And even still, the WoW development leadership remains largely unchanged. Every time I stop by to chat with these people -- the same people I've been interacting with for years now -- I'm inspired by their creativity, their talent, and their dedication to making this game mega-awesomesauce.
(Source)
Ragnaros Model
The problem is that you have no context or perspective on the model you've seen a static image of.
He's not just going to be running around the moment every raid reaches him.
I don’t think a lot of you understand; perspective is a large part of art design. The designers probably designed the model looking upwards from his feet. I bet you Rags’ll look epic when you see him in person
This is sort of what I was getting at with my first point. The perspective is completely different when a player character is standing near him. The proportions were designed with that in mind, which is why the screenshot of the model really doesn't do Ragnaros justice at all. (Source)
These forums have always been about players talking to players. We don't want to foster the expectation that it's going to get a blue response if someone tries hard enough (lol I'm replying to a thread calling for a blue). While GC added a lot to these forums (and I say 'these forums' because he only posted in the North America forums) we think we can reach more players, particularly those in other regions, more directly through the blogs, or concerted Q&A's. Blogs also tend to be a better medium for getting the message out there loud and clear, but does have downsides that it removes the conversation that we know is appreciated quite a bit.
While forum posts do lend themselves to that conversational approach, they actually have a lot of downsides to them from our perspective of attempting to get clear and clean information to the players. They aren't very visible is really the first and maybe biggest problem. You can liken forum posts and the information given in them to some of the displeasure surrounding how hotfixes are communicated. I may reply to a thread 20 times and in my #13 reply I say something really important regarding class balance. Who is going to see that? How quickly will that knowledge actually permeate? Will the message be kept clear? Will my clarification in post #17 that explains what people are misunderstanding in #13 be seen by everyone that read #13? People tend not to read past the first blue post in a thread, or skip around and don't read them all, so if you have a correction/addendum to the first post, or just expound upon a thought, it's generally lost on the majority of readers. Blue trackers can help with this, but we're generally not having to explain that "post #13 wasn't the end of the thought and it's being taken out of context" to people who just go to blue trackers. Forum posts also tend to be fairly quickly written by one of us without much in the way of peer-review, and anything written off-the-cuff like a reply to a thread can tend to be more precarious than a more substantive outlet that has an official process of review and correction before its posted (like the blogs). Much to the dismay of many forum goers I'm sure, there's just an infinitely smaller chance we'll say something stupid or mess up in a fully published blog post.
As with anything we do, we never believe we're perfect. There's always room to improve. The blogs may not be the best outlet but we're continually working to improve upon the content we're delivering, and have some pretty exciting stuff planned. We're also working to make the comment system for the blogs a bit more like the forums so conversation can be held there more easily, as well. Of course you've no doubt see we're running a recurring global Ask the Devs Q&A. It's one way where we're hoping to fill that gap of direct developer interaction that the blogs probably just can't hit. We think the Q&A's are going to be extremely popular and fill a big part of what made GC's interactions on here so useful. And we’re going to continue collecting feedback and posting when appropriate, but we'll also be trying to come up with additional ways to facilitate the communication between the developers and players. (Source)
Recycling content in future patches
There definitely is not a hard and fast rule about updating existing content. If we feel revamping existing content makes sense in the current state of the game and lore -- and we think it will be fun -- sure, it's a possibility. You definitely shouldn't expect this every patch though. In the grand scheme of World of Warcraft's history, we've reintroduced very little existing content per patch and expansion. (Source)
And let's get real - we know why you're recycling old content. With the next Starcraft 2 expansion, Diablo 3, and an "unannounced MMO" all in production, I'm guessing the art team has its hands full. Recycling old content is an easy way to create a "new" instance with old art assets.
There isn't a singular Blizzard Entertainment art team. Each franchise has its own art department. We don't just pull resources from one project to give more attention to another in the sense you're suggesting. This is why we have multiple development teams (which include art teams for each) and can work on multiple franchises simultaneously. (Source)
"OMG ALL THE DEVS ARE GONE!"
That wasn't at all the context of the post to which I was responded. That player was suggesting that a singular art team directs their attention away from WoW to work on art for our other games. That's not true.
Now, if an individual person does move onto a new project, their position is filled. Therefore, the resources are still there (which is why I said "in the sense you're suggesting"). This is how career advancement works at any company. How else do you account for a company's growth? You bring in new talent (or move them up from within the company) and train them under the current folks so they can eventually fill the vacancy.
This talk about losing WoW developers, or that WoW is left to a "B team" is getting tiresome. There is no finite pool of talent and we have every intention of making sure WoW development remains very strong.
All of this is practically besides the point anyway. All you've been told is some talented people who helped build WoW into what it is today have moved over to another project to help bring it to fruition. You don't know who those people are, what positions they held on the WoW team, or how many of them have moved onto other projects. Most of them, in fact, are programmers working to develop the systems and tech for a new project. And the programmers WoW has now are amazing. They've taken the original systems and improved upon them many times over.
Just as an example, think back to how slowly UI improvements would be implemented in vanilla and TBC. Now there are scores of great UI improvements nearly every patch. That team is incredible and very experienced. Just the same, the class design team has hardly changed in years, save for a couple of additions (read: not subtractions).
Every department at Blizzard has expanded immensely over the years to accommodate the growing playerbase, as well as our ambitions for the future of the company. You can look at our job opportunities page just to get an example for the talent search we have constantly going on.
Bringing in new talent and growing the company from within is far from a bad thing. It's a great thing and has allowed us to develop several projects simultaneously without short-changing any of them. Anyone who says otherwise is working on an incredible amount of speculation and assumptions.
And even still, the WoW development leadership remains largely unchanged. Every time I stop by to chat with these people -- the same people I've been interacting with for years now -- I'm inspired by their creativity, their talent, and their dedication to making this game mega-awesomesauce.
(Source)Ragnaros Model
The problem is that you have no context or perspective on the model you've seen a static image of.
- 1) Standing next to the full-sized, animated model will give you a very different perspective when you're looking up from his toenail
- 2) Knowing that he will only come out of his lava pool to reveal his full figure in a Heroic-only phase of the fight will give you a bit more context
He's not just going to be running around the moment every raid reaches him.
I don’t think a lot of you understand; perspective is a large part of art design. The designers probably designed the model looking upwards from his feet. I bet you Rags’ll look epic when you see him in person
This is sort of what I was getting at with my first point. The perspective is completely different when a player character is standing near him. The proportions were designed with that in mind, which is why the screenshot of the model really doesn't do Ragnaros justice at all. (Source)
Site Navigation
vBulletin Message