AoE Changes in Shadowlands
Originally Posted by Blizzard (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)
We’ve definitely heard a lot of feedback from players that bursting down larger and larger pulls has become an overly dominant tactic in much of the game. This is particularly evident in questing and dungeons, which has made it difficult for many classes to find a clear role.

While there are a number of variables contributing to this trend, high burst area of effect (AOE) damage against an unlimited number of targets has made it increasingly possible for players to take down large groups of enemies without the players ever facing a proportionate level of danger. In Shadowlands, we’re looking at changes that would broaden the field of tactical options, and in the process, more clearly differentiate the strengths of classes in a variety of AOE situations.

For example, we’d like to see Outlaw Rogues or Fury Warriors excel in situations with 4 to 5 targets in close proximity to each other, while ranged casters like Frost Mages or Affliction Warlocks perform better in sustained damage against groups of 5 or more targets. To accomplish this, we need to revisit the maximum number of targets that many abilities can hit (also known as the ability’s “target cap”), and adjust them accordingly. In situations where a target cap doesn’t make sense, we’re adding a new kind of damage falloff that causes the damage done to each target to be reduced gradually as the number of targets increases.

Most players who are used to fighting 3 to 5 enemies at a time will notice very little difference with this approach. On the other hand, players who are accustomed to pulling 10-20 enemies at a time will experience longer, more threatening engagements. Sustained AOE damage may become an equally viable option in that situation, but both approaches will put significantly more pressure on the group to survive.

Shadowlands Developer Interview - Ion Hazzikostas
Sloot had the chance to sit down with Ion Hazzikostas to talk about Shadowlands!

Alpha and Beta
  • There aren't any huge sets of class changes that have been held back for future release.
  • The team is trying to get as many changes in as early as they can so that they can start getting feedback while there is still time on act on it.
  • Previous expansions had some changes added late during beta and the team didn't have time to respond to feedback before things went live.

Dual Wield
  • The team is listening to feedback and talking about Single Minded Fury for Fury Warriors. There are still some problems to solve before that could come back.
  • It is unlikely that 2H Enhancement is coming back. It has been gone for a long time.

AoE Target Cap
  • The 5 target AoE cap on some spells aims to restore some niches that used to exist.
  • Back in the day, cleave was distinct from AoE. Some melee would be outstanding at cleave, which was different than AoE such as Arcane Explosion.
  • AoE target caps were removed in pursuit of simplification.
  • The right answer now is rounding up everything and AoEing it all down. That's super fun and a cool solution, but shouldn't be the solution to every problem.
  • The team wants to add more depth so that AoE everything isn't always the right answer. Players will adapt to having more than one right answer.

GCD Changes
  • There is an element of skill in making decisions when an ability being on the GCD is an additional factor.
  • The team doesn't want skill in WoW to be heavily tied to twitch reaction time. If you miss a GCD (that isn't an interrupt), you probably shouldn't die.
  • Please provide specific feedback when talking about GCD changes. "Revert the changes" has been heard.

  • No plans to bring back Master Loot.
  • Adventures are coming with Covenants, so you'll still have a mission table system.
  • No plans to change gear swapping in Mythic+ right now.
  • The team wants to do tier sets again, but they aren't in the first patch of the expansion.
  • Previously, you expected to have your tier bonus quickly in the tier, which made all of those slots dead to Mythic+ loot.
  • There were lots of positive aspects to having tier sets, such as the class specific art and fantasy, and the team wants to bring those back.

Alt Friendliness
  • Alt friendliness can mean different things to different players. Some players want a variety of experiences and perspectives. Covenant arcs will help with this.
  • As far as alt friendliness goes, Shadowlands should be better on all fronts. There is no AP / long tail grind that you feel like you need to always be doing.
  • You shouldn't feel like you are sacrificing your main to make some progress on your alt.

  • The team could do a better job of listening to feedback.
  • Essences in Patch 8.2 are an example of trying to listen. As soon as the PTR went up, essences were on vendors and the way they were earned was revealed. This gave the team time to iterate and make it better.
  • The team is often still developing a feature that they are getting feedback on, so players don't have a view of the entire system.
  • The goal for the Shadowlands alpha is to get systems into alpha sooner so that they can start getting feedback faster. They want to have time to react to feedback.

  • Some of the community thought Covenants were a cosmetic feature, but they are a core part of the gameplay and story.
  • You'll have traits, trees of traits, Covenant specific legendary items, transmog, and more.
  • There is a whole package of Covenant specific things. Covenant abilities are just a part of the package.
  • The team hopes that they'll be able to balance Covenant abilities so that there isn't a huge power difference between them.
  • The team is holding out for meaningful choice.
  • Is the game still a RPG anymore?
  • The second that the team says that only cosmetics fall into the choices that are hard to change is when the RPG elements are removed from the game.
  • Not every power choice needs to be easy to change on the fly.
  • The team is trying to save the beating heart of the RPG genre.
  • The difference between Covenant abilities should be situational preference.
  • They can fall back to allowing you to swap Covenant abilities if they fail, but it'll look odd and feel bad. The game loses something by doing so.
  • What is a path forward that isn't just "Don't ever attach power to any kind of meaningful choice"?
  • Covenants are a personal journey, your friends may be sent to the same place, you can group up and work together. The team doesn't want to separate players, you should be able to play with your friends outside of the small piece that is the Covenants campaigns.

  • With time invested each week, you should get more choice at the end of the week. Being able to pick from a range of items should help with the RNG.
  • If you look back to Classic, loot was a reward and a goal. There was randomness, sometimes things didn't drop, but it wasn't that random. Eventually you would get an item. Once you had it, it was done, you didn't have to worry about sockets or Titanforging.
  • The team added more and more loot to the game each expansion, so bosses had to drop more items and raid groups would saturate on gear before they finished the raid.
  • It's not about keeping you playing, chasing a carrot, it's about keeping players challenged and progressing. Players would kill a boss late in the raid and end up disenchanting what had dropped, as most groups take a couple months to get through a raid.
  • The team is going to reduce the amount of loot that drops in Shadowlands raids.
  • There is no Warforging, Titanforging, or Corruption in Shadowlands. Let loot be loot.
  • The team is still working on how to work Jewelcrafting and other professions into "let loot be loot".
  • Corrupting tuning was a mistake, the team missed the mark pretty severely early on.
  • The team didn't want to upset the hierarchy of Corruption items after players had them.
  • Passive procs/bonuses should be middle of the road. They shouldn't sim the best or be the best compared to procs/bonuses that require active gameplay.
  • Your performance from pull to pull should vary based on your gameplay and less on proc chance.

  • Addressing balance concerns promptly is always a goal.
  • In the past priorities have been a challenge.
  • Thunderclap - Team wants to let emergent playstyles breathe. Let players reap the benefits. Sometimes these are kinda cool. Sometimes they are frustrating. It takes time to figure out which way it is going.
  • The team wants to be more conservative to balance changes with Azerite Traits, as they are choices that aren't as easily changed.
  • Live balance wasn't a high priority for the systems team, they were focused on fixing Azerite Essences for 8.2.
  • In the future this will be avoided by having a more successful alpha and beta so that the team can focus on tuning the live game.

  • The team is happy with the structure of Mythic+
  • They may iterate on specific affixes. Seasonal affixes have worked out pretty well.
  • The team still needs to figure out what incentive there is to run a dungeon over and over without Titanforging. Having a better chance of getting loot you want and more choices is a reason.
  • It's fine if you want to do one or two Mythic+ a week, the team doesn't want you to feel pressured to do more.

  • There will be some (fairly permissive) limits on Torghast runs.
  • Even if you don't get rewards, players may feel pressured to keep practicing Torghast if there weren't limits.
  • The team wants to have lots of ways to earn more keys. If you play more WoW, you'll be able to do more runs.
  • Rewards can be more powerful if you can't spam run it for 20 hours straight.
  • Torghast will have cosmetics, story progression, and legendary rewards.
  • The team wants to get Torghast fully stood up and then add rewards.
  • Legendary items are craftable, unlock recipes from sources in Torghast, Maw, and Shadowlands. Recipe unlocks will be account-wide.
  • Infuse crafted gloves in Torghast to make them legendary.
  • The guy crafting the gloves may have made the Lich King's helm or the Legion legendary items. He has access to knowledge and materials.
  • You might be able to put some of the old bonuses on the legendary items.
  • Torghast can have new environments, creatures, powers, and rewards throughout the expansion. No plans for leaderboards right now. Team wants to let Torghast evolve and then support whatever direction it goes.

World Quests
  • World Quests are coming later in alpha as the level cap goes up.
  • No Emissaries. Replaced with Covenant callings. A little more flexibility. Remixed.

PvP and PvE
  • Having both feed into a shared chest, allowing you to do the one you prefer to get more options should help to reduce the pressure to do both PvE and PvP.
  • Some amount of crossover is healthy. If you can excel in both areas, you should have a slight advantage over someone that just does one. This can go too far, it should just be a slight advantage.

  • What can the team do to make the WoW community stronger and make it easier to find friends.
  • Want to return to the social roots and potential of WoW from Classic.
This article was originally published in forum thread: Shadowlands Developer Interview - Ion Hazzikostas started by chaud View original post
Comments 206 Comments
  1. Laqweeta's Avatar
    Please say they're looking into removing Insanity/Void Form. Please for the love of god.
  1. Fawkess's Avatar
    I really liked Ion's answer on AoE capping of targets, I think I'm fine with that being in game if it helps other specs other than Rogue/DH in mythic plus
  1. Lucrece's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Riptor View Post
    I really liked Ion's answer on AoE capping of targets, I think I'm fine with that being in game if it helps other specs other than Rogue/DH in mythic plus
    Yeah, because we clearly need more busted ass fire mages and BM hunters instead with their braindead 90%+ instant cast damage from range.
  1. RickJamesLich's Avatar
    The concept of aoeing everything down was interesting at a point in time because it was challenging... this issue should've been fixed like a decade ago though. There's only a few ways to do it, if you make the mobs harder, it will still be possible with gear progression. Bringing back threat IMO may be the best way to do it.
  1. OokOok's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Riptor View Post
    I really liked Ion's answer on AoE capping of targets, I think I'm fine with that being in game if it helps other specs other than Rogue/DH in mythic plus
    LOL kids are so cute, you really think nerfing the overal AOE of rogue/DH is going to make your paladin or warlock suddenly viable? Rogue/DH had solid aoe damage it's true, but so do a lot of other classes, it's the fact they also come with solid utility and mobility. Unless they decide to change that, rogue and DH will still be the meta with a hunter or mage for lust
  1. Biomega's Avatar
    AoE caps are a GREAT change, for many reasons.


    They are not going to magically change class balance and meta picks, because it wasn't JUST good AoE damage that makes specs like Outlaw or Havoc busted in M+. There's many more changes that need to be made, and many of those are far more impactful than AoE damage (like utility skills etc.).

    So yes, nerfing AoE is a step in the right direction, but is just, you know, ONE STEP.
  1. Savara's Avatar
    Please remove the corruption system it's terrible. It doesn't show skill at all and the RNG is horrible that's the main thing I want in SL tbh.
  1. guisadop's Avatar
    The nice thing about AoE is seeing all those damage counters flying across your screen when you hit a lot of targets. Caps are more "no fun allowed".
  1. Uko's Avatar
    RIP any hopes that they will split the power gains from the cosmetics and lore of covenants. Guess I'm just going to be whatever sims the best regardless of how much I like the lore and cosmetics of a covenant.
  1. Warning's Avatar
    Warlocks need a lot more changes. It's really unacceptable that Shadowbolt and Incinerate still hit like total noodles and that these specs still have too much of their damage linked to darkglare/Infernal.
    Also talents like Soul Fire and Shadowburn being unchanged is kinda ridiculous. Shadowburn should be a baseline 15 sec CD execute and hit hard again, Soul Fire should be instant and called Fel Flame but can remain a talent. Imo Roaring blaze and Grimoire of Supremacy should be scrapped and replaced with new stuff as well.

    Tier sets should be 8 pieces with only a 2 set and 4 set so you keep a lot of freedom with off pieces.

    Think AoE capping some melee abilities and returning that role to stuff like Rain of Fire and Arcane explosion is a good idea to bring casters back into the M+ meta.
  1. Great Destiny Man's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Seyra View Post
    Please remove the corruption system it's terrible. It doesn't show skill at all and the RNG is horrible that's the main thing I want in SL tbh.
    Not sure what you're worried about here since corruption is an 8.3 system only.
  1. redmeance89's Avatar
    can we PLEASE get gladiator stance back???!?!?! it was su much fun to have a prot warrior dps that could off tank and yet dish out some competitive dps
  1. Biomega's Avatar
    RIP so their solution to the whole problem of Covenants being min/maxed is effectively "well there's so much to them, which means we have so many knobs to turn and balance it all!" which I'm sure is SO VERY LIKELY TO HAPPEN given Blizzard's track record.

    And they have the gall to compare it to racials, which are at <1% power and STILL get min/maxed, while Covenant abilities as they are right now look to be MUCH MUCH MORE of a difference.

    I just don't believe them that they'll be able to balance it in a satisfying way. I'm ready to be positively surprised, but there is no way that I am not expecting a colossal crashdown on this system given past experience.
  1. kyo wolfsfang's Avatar
    im really hating that AoE cap.... mainly for world stuff. if im out leveling or doing a quest i want to pull a bunch and kill them all at once.
  1. MakeMeLaugh's Avatar
    There is an element of skill in making decisions when the ability being on the GCD is a factor.
    Please provide specific feedback when talking about GCD changes. "Revert the changes" has been heard.
    This is bad news. Another situation of "we hear you but actually fuck you".

    What you mean specific feedback??????? HOW MUCH MORE FEEDBACK DO YOU NEED?!
  1. TheRevenantHero's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by guisadop View Post
    The nice thing about AoE is seeing all those damage counters flying across your screen when you hit a lot of targets. Caps are more "no fun allowed".
    This is such a ridiculous take. It's literally like you didn't even listen to what he said. The reason it's changing is because people are just rounding everything up and using AoE. There are no other tactics. This change is a far better idea and has nothing to do with "no fun allowed".
  1. Fawkess's Avatar
    No more titanforging/corruption on gear

    fuck yes
  1. thilicen's Avatar
    "There is no Warforging, Titanforging, or Corruption in Shadowlands. Let loot be loot."

    Well I just fucking came.
  1. Laqweeta's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by thilicen View Post
    "There is no Warforging, Titanforging, or Corruption in Shadowlands. Let loot be loot."

    Well I just fucking came.
    At the cost of loot being reduced from raids. Now I'm not sure how much It'll be reduced, and if It'll apply to M+ loot as well - but lord they just always have to introduce a negative with a positive.

    But this is good, don't get me wrong. The insane amount of time played metrics introduced in BfA obviously didn't work and it backfired, they're going back to the roots THANK GOD.
  1. Sanguinerd's Avatar
    I'm glad they're sticking to their guns about Covenants and not making it easy to swap just because some whiny bitches have to ruin everything with their min/maxing.

Site Navigation