Because you don't want to admit that based on your definitions water is also a poison, as is the air you breathe?
Because having to admit that means you have to support a tax on water and a tax on breathing?
Or because you then have to admit that HFCS is not a poison?
Tax bad things and subsidise healthy?
this thread has gone everywhere already, i might as well join in. while in the navy, one of my jobs was dealing with the evap unit - it makes clean water from salt water. the water that comes out of there is INCREDIBLY pure, and bromine is added to bring the concentration down to tolerable (bromine is used to do this because it has similar "keeping" qualities to chlorine, but is apparently a little bit less offensive to the system). i was informed - and it's in navy manuals - that pure water is actually toxic to the system
I remember, fews weeks ago, I took my Pepsi bottle, then I looked at the calories Tag on it. I said Man, I need to drink more healthy so I took the Oasis apple juice, and I took a look at the label... It had the same damn amount of Calories... I then took the Tropicana Orange juice, and again, same damn number. I did a last check on my 2% milk and it was about the same amount. Then I said damn it, and I took the Pepsi bottle back.
So what is so bad about Soda if they have the same amount of Calorie then a good brand juice. I'm suppose to drink water until the end of my life or what?
And before but it's not the same, both had the almost the same amount of sugar, juice only trade a small percentage of glucose for fructose.
---------- Post added 2012-04-09 at 03:31 AM ----------
About the pure water is toxic... Your reds cells try to keep the liquid they have inside equal in mineral to the liquid in your veins by adding some into them. So if your blood become too pure(not enough salt and other mineral) from drinking pure water, your red cell will explode from getting to much blood inside of them, since you can't get pure water by adding pure water to normal water. At least is what I remember from my college science class.
MMO-Champion, once the place to get WoW News, now the home of the haters and their clickbait and doomsaying threads
Where are the calories coming from? Juice really isn't that much better for you than soda... it has about the same amount of sugar (although it's natural sugar, rather than HFCS), except that it has vitamins and maybe some dietary fiber. In the milk, the calories are coming from fat, most likely.
If I look at say, Gatorade and OJ, the gatorade has half the calories for the same quantity. And fancy that, it has about half the sugar.
Pretty much.So what is so bad about Soda if they have the same amount of Calorie then a good brand juice. I'm suppose to drink water until the end of my life or what?
Why am I back here, I don't even play these games anymore
The problem with the internet is parallel to its greatest achievement: it has given the little man an outlet where he can be heard. Most of the time however, the little man is a little man because he is not worth hearing.
Would this affect other sugary drinks (i.e juices, gatorade, ect.?)
OT: IDK, it's a similar situation to the fat tax in denmark. I think it helps people in the end, and maybe it could lessen the other taxes we pay...
Youre basically right. States have made bad decisions and are in debt so they are trying to find more ways of getting more tax dollars like this and taxing internet commerce like Amazon.com. What they should be doing is getting rid of the unnecessary or inefficient(not economically sound) services they provide using your tax money. Austerity means spending less money not making more.
A better way of getting more tax money is an improved economy in which people are consuming more. Making things people buy more expensive will not help them buy more of them and improve the economy.