Originally Posted by
Wisermage
Agree with Lolercaust. This didn't happen 20 years ago and I find it hard to believe he would be prosecuted on just the testimony of a 9 year old. Stranger things have happened I guess but it would be interesting to see what the prosecuter laid out as their case.
And everyone saying this man's life is over is a little off base. He will sue the state, he will win and he will be paid restitution for the past 9 years. He probably won't be needing to go out and get a job anytime soon. He'll probably also write a book and have a mad for tv movie come out in the next 6 months.
What happened to this man is horrible but why would someone come back 9 years later and say he didn't do it and then the state says "OK" we believe you, let the dude go plox. Was there absolutely no physical evidence in this case? Strange to say the least.