The kids didn't deserve to die, but what are you gonna do, right?
Make the shooter do a public apology and clean some public bathrooms for a few years. GG
The kids didn't deserve to die, but what are you gonna do, right?
Make the shooter do a public apology and clean some public bathrooms for a few years. GG
That story is very suspicious to me. The old mans story seems to be a little crazy, and I think there is more going on. He shot them, then he executed them, then he tried to hide the bodies? I have doubts that the kids ever broken in at all, because both of their stories make them seem to be pretty decent kids. I've got the feeling that this was pure murder and no self defense at all.
Last edited by Eldar45; 2012-11-27 at 08:11 PM.
Make mistakes - A few or several mistakes are totally fine. I don't mind them. But when you're breaking laws that can get you in jail for plenty of years. Doing Drugs, drinking as underaged. Does it stop there? No, they're lookin' for more and even break into a old seniors house in search of more. Tell me, how is that nice? Is a murder a nice guy? I mean he just did one simple mistake?
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
Regardless of the case - You can't look at it differently - What would you do when someone breaks into your house? Would pick the phone, wherever it is - Attempt to call the police in silence so they can't hear you, even though you don't know if they're armed. Right? And wait 5 - 10 min for the police to arrive so some people can steal and snatch all your stuff and maybe find you.
Most likely you will use the arguement - THEY WERE TEENAGERS AND NOT EQUIPED WITH WEAPONS - This might be true, but how would I know that? How can I be sure of that a group of two breaking in my house are un-equiped with weapons? I wouldn't take the chance, would you?
Stop defending someone that has done wrong. Close the first case to resolve the other one. This has two parts.
This girl should've called the police. She didn't need to have a gun
http://abcnews.go.com/US/kendra-st-c...ry?id=17524438
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
That is odd. But you're centralizing the old senior at age of what? 60-70? Problem is that we all speak without experience. We don't know how this man felt. 60-70 year old guy - most likely is disabled in some way. Someone breaks into his house and know put yourself in the picture - What to do? You're more into to prove the girls innocence and putting the man in the dark light than trying to resolve this case.
Oh? And where do you live? The United States of America is an extremely diverse country. Having lived here nearly all my life I could argue that every state has its own culture. Living in Utah is a hell of a lot different than living in Texas. Living in New York is a hell of a lot different than living in California. Different people. Different mindsets. You are grouping together entirely different people and in my opinion are coming very close to nation bashing. Gun rights is a hotly debated topic especially in the United States. Not all of us are egotistical, selfish, gunslinging maniacs. In fact, I know of very few who are.
With that said, back on topic I hope this guy stays in jail for the rest of his life. I don't see any way to justify what he did. Two teenagers do not deserve to die for attempting to steal who knows what. I don't care if it was $10, $50, or even $10,000 worth of stuff. Two lives > $10,000 worth of items. Two lives > $1,000,000 worth of items. Fucking hell, people.
I just wish the teens where at home instead of breaking into a home.
heh, you can derail this thread because it's been beaten worse than a dead horse... or dead home invader.
The fact that you are involved in the courts means you are costing tax payers money. You won't expand on what it is, so we can assume you have tied up at least a judge if not a public defender as well... along with any court personnel needed to deal with your case.
Now you want to talk about healthcare... you obviously then don't support Obamacare because it forces people to purchase health insurance. So if that's such a huge issue, it amazes me that you in the same breath bash Romney who is against Obamacare. Which is it?