Its called shock. Nor do I see "relish" anywhere.
Its called shock. Nor do I see "relish" anywhere.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
When did he say he was afraid there were others? He said he was afraid at the time that they were armed, but made no mention of other people. Also, please point out the justification for this part?
"The complaint says Smith then grabbed a .22 revolver he was wearing and shot Kifer several times in the chest, "more shots than I needed to," he reportedly told detectives. He then dragged her body into his workshop where he had also placed Schaeffel.
At that point, Smith told investigators, Kifer was still gasping for breath so he put the handgun under her chin and fired a bullet into her head, describing it as "a good clean finishing shot.""
She wasn't dead yet, so he killed her.
He did not commit murder. some sort of manslaughter maybe.
He killed them, went about his day normally, didn't call the cops. Seemed to lack remorse and take relish in a kill. How is this shock? Sounds more like a sociopath. Stop making excuses for a fucking savage.typically include an initial state of "daze", with some constriction of the field of consciousness and narrowing of attention, inability to comprehend stimuli, and disorientation.
This state may be quickly followed by either further withdrawal from the surrounding situation (to the extent of a dissociative stupor), or by agitation and overactivity, anxiety, impaired judgement, confusion, detachment, and depression.
Well, ok then.
I suppose it's unfounded because I have not ever, nor will be, ever institutionalized. Fact. Locked.
You're just captaining the USS Makeshitup.
All this ill-willing towards another person who's done nothing wrong on your part though, hoping I would be locked up. I'd argue that's a touch more sociopathic than me not giving a shit two shitheads ate it breaking into some old man's home.
They can dynamite Devil Reef, but that will bring no relief, Y'ha-nthlei is deeper than they know.
Oh yeah, I completely agree. I was talking about physically, mentally, and emotionally, not legally. Still, even tried as adults, people should be given more help than punishment, because maybe then they can recover.
That's what I'm saying, he went about his day normally because he was in a state of panic and shock, he didn't have any idea what to do, he knew people would side on the kids, and he just couldn't decide what to do, so he tried to go about his day. Just because he went about his day "normally" doesn't mean that he wasn't terrified and in extreme shock and contemplating what to do. He did lose control, as would most people, which again, is why he didn't do anything, he didn't want to be seen as the antagonist whether or not he was. Again, I don't think that that quote is necessarily completely in context, and even if it was, it was probably just an attempt to justify his actions to himself, because he likely felt terrible.
I didn't even think of that.
After he shot her, changed guns (so he could continue shooting her), then dragged her, and executed her. He no longer is in "the head of passion"Voluntary manslaughter is the killing of a human being in which the offender had no prior intent to kill and acted during "the heat of passion
As far as what he's told police? Well that's where the "shock" part comes in. It can set in quickly and last for a couple of days. He may not be remembering clearly. Let's not forget police officers tendency to, how shall we say, "lead" suspects during questioning? I don't see anything about an attorney being present during questioning. Nor how long it lasted. For an old man who has just been through a traumatic experience? I suspect there are a lot more details that will come out as he mentally recovers.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
So let's get this clear right now.
Woman breaks into mans house. Man captures woman, ties her up, locks her in basement, rapes her repeatedly, then tortures her to death. You'd be like "whatever she shouldn't have broken into the house"
Wow people like you are a real problem.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
It was likely a mercy shot. We can't know for certain so it would be best if we just leave the detail out or just assume one or the other happened, not argue which happened.
I don't think you understand what shock can do to you.
This is not the part we're justifying with shock. In fact, most of us are saying this is where he was wrong and should be convicted of something (something less than murder, like manslaughter).