A lot of people who are incapable of handling raising a dog, often buy breeds of dogs that require experience or help to raise, because certain breeds are considered "tough" or "cool" to have. As a result, we get a lot of dogs that are like their owners, irresponsible and violent.
"Known". That would mainly be because they (or atleast most of the dog breeds that media adresses as "pitbulls") are of the type called "terrier". Or at least this would be the only valid reason as to why they supposedly are "known" for their tenacity.
All terriers are known for their tenacity and stubborness, so it's not a pittie-only trait. But my guess is calling a foxterrier a "baby" wouldn't upset you as much.
My dads 5 year old rottie is a 65kg baby on for legs btw.
Last edited by mmoc92050dc89a; 2013-01-08 at 06:17 PM.
This, the shit rules we have to deal with because of 1 asshat is amazing. I used to have a Pit, sweetest dog i have ever seen. She was wary of strangers and black people (which was fucking weird because am black) but not aggressive, didnt bark, Loved kids, was a quiet and sweet dog. People used to walk up and pet her and she would be ok with it.
I had one lady and her kid walk up to us while we where sitting on a park bench, the kid starts petting my dog as i was talking to the lady, she asked what breed she was because she was so quiet and sweet. As soon as i said pit bull, she grabbed her kid and ran.
"Humility defeats pride, Master Yang has preached. Pride defeats man"
Not really, often I'd agree. But animals can get scared by a bird flying by and attack a person or child in the process...is it the dogs fault? It isn't, but that doesn't make the matter better.
Better prevent the deal with a situation that is very likely to happen with some breeds.
It's true though...it's just in the genes to react differently to new environments or changes. Nothing can be done about it, there are experts out there on this matter you know.
Last edited by mmoc6f961e454e; 2013-01-08 at 06:20 PM.
It's probably a size restriction.
Great Dane's for example can be very friendly, but they probably would not allow you to have one in the apartment...
They are capable of pretty much what every other dog breed is capable of. And I'm well aware of what it is because I've spent my 20-something long life socializing with them. Both non-problem and "problem" dogs. I have met and cared for rotties, pitties, german shepherds, dobermanns, australian shepherds, dachshunds, spaniels and many other breeds. I've been bit twice in my entire life - one of them was serious enough to have me stitched up at the ER. Both times were by two different dachshunds. But please, enlighten me if you think you know more about canines :-)
I know well enough to not consider them/treat them like babies.
No. That's just stupid. They have been proven to have different levels of intelligence, different strengths, different temperaments.They are capable of pretty much what every other dog breed is capable of.
Just because I call anyone a "baby" doesn't mean I treat them like one. Anyone who has ever been in contact with a dog knows that you can't treat a dog like a baby, and that doesn't exclude small-sized dogs. Dogs need a pack leader. It's your role as an owner/carer to be one and lead them. Stop being so butt-hurt about what a person chooses to call his or her dog.
Yes, different breeds have different strengths and to a certain degree - temperament. But mind you, temperament can also be very individual. Pitbulls are known as the "nanny-dog" because of their loving and nurturing temperament. Google it and you'll see. This doesn't mean there are some bad eggs in there - which exists due to unresponisble breeding. But this obviously goes for any type of dog breed and not just powerful breeds. Something that people seem to freaking refuse to recognize.
In fact as far as I'm aware the UK is the only european nation that outright bans guns for civilians.This is why people ban guns. Gun supporters don't know what guns are.Shotguns I'll give you (provided you're allowed 12 and larger gauges... because I mean... come on...) but not .22s.
Do you even know what husbandry is? Society's valuing aggression and breeding for it (lol) would be legitimate if there was evidence that a certain type of human was inherently more aggressive, but they aren't. It's never happened because we've never had an omnipotent power like the Bene Gesserit to do it.
In fact as far as I'm aware the UK is the only european nation that outright bans guns for civilians.This is why people ban guns. Gun supporters don't know what guns are.Shotguns I'll give you (provided you're allowed 12 and larger gauges... because I mean... come on...) but not .22s.
http://www.fecava.org/sites/default/....2.pdf#page=11
That is at least a good start about that discussion:
"There is an ongoing debate about the relative importance of genetics and early environment on a range of behavioural responses. Certainly nature is relevant to the subject of canine aggression and genetics can influence the tendency to express aggressive behaviours by influencing emotional stability. Fear and anxiety are heritable behavioural traits and the common practice of breeding from nervous bitches to “help to calm them down” can contribute to the perpetuation of defensive aggression. The functional basis of a breed will also influence its threshold of expression of certain behaviour but the singling out of breed as a causative factor in cases of canine aggression has led to inappropriate legislation in many countries across Europe."
This is why responsible breeding is very important. For ANY breed.