Study dropped after researchers fail to find ANY men that have not consumed porn.

[Deleted]

only for the comedy value....people actually get off on porn? really? its hilarious.

[Grizzly Willy]

only for the comedy value....people actually get off on porn? really? its hilarious.

Please, do tell how you're different.

[Deleted]

lol Really? For me, masterbation is all about the release, not the process. I don't turn it in to an all day affair, I want to get it done.

What's your fastest finish?

[Kurioxan]

lol Really? For me, masterbation is all about the release, not the process. I don't turn it in to an all day affair, I want to get it done.

As i said many times, if i do something i do it all the way! :P
But its rare, anyway *cough*

[Deleted]

Please, do tell how you're different.

not sure what you mean. I'm sure everyone looks at porn, but really? people find it arousing? All that fake people, with surgically deformed bodies, all that fake groaning, the weird way they treat people. Its got comedy value, but thats about it. Its totally unrealistic, and its pretty unattractive.

[derpkitteh]

I'm honestly surprised people didn't discover pornography until they were like 13-14, we had sex ed in Sweden when we were 10. I can still remember when my classmate asked why there are condoms with strawberry flavour.

i still ask why there are condom with flavors.... wouldn't you wanna taste everything? i know i do.

OT: it's not really surprising. what with the interwebz being as vast and wonderful as it is.

[Reg]

What's your fastest finish?

Sure as hell didn't take 40 minutes lol

[Grizzly Willy]

not sure what you mean. I'm sure everyone looks at porn, but really? people find it arousing? All that fake people, with surgically deformed bodies, all that fake groaning, the weird way they treat people. Its got comedy value, but thats about it. Its totally unrealistic, and its pretty unattractive.

Because not all porn has people filled with plastic?

[Doylez]

only for the comedy value....people actually get off on porn? really? its hilarious.

Ofc not, I only watch it for educational purposes... for science!

[s_bushido]

Please, do tell how you're different.

The internet is for two things:
Porn.
Trying to make yourself sound super-awesome to complete strangers.

[Grizzly Willy]

Ofc not, I only watch it for educational purposes... for science!

I watch it for the articles.



Wait.

[Deleted]

Sure as hell didn't take 40 minutes lol

Lol, don't be shy. Share an estimate of your fastest time!

I'm rather curious because people always go on about how long they can last, so this is a funny alternative way to look at it.

[Reg]

Lol, don't be shy. Share an estimate of your fastest time!

I'm rather curious because people always go on about how long they can last, so this is a funny alternative way to look at it.

In optimal conditions and I haven't done it in a couple weeks, I could probably finish in 5 minutes if I just furiously wanked it out lol

[Deleted]

In optimal conditions and I haven't done it in a couple weeks, I could probably finish in 5 minutes if I just furiously wanked it out lol

With your rushed time, you probably actually last longer than most guys that are trying to prolong it.

The Kinsey Institute reports that 75% of all males reach orgasm within 2 minutes of penetration.

[Sayl]

I realize this thread is intended to be all in fun. That being said, this is a prime example of why I really hate tabloids.

The original University of Montreal release dates back to December, 2009: Are the effects of pornography negligible? The actual story is that the author's findings refute claims made by groups trying to demonize porn and paint its impact on society as detrimental.

But a few days later the British tabloid The Sun was the first to run it through the stupidifier (followed by the Daily Mail a day later), distorting the focus to "Oh noes we couldn't find any guys who haven't watched porn, HAHAH!".

Now here's the same recycled crap dredged up by The Mirror over three years later. And the actual story is still lost.

[Arkenaw]

I realize this thread is intended to be all in fun. That being said, this is a prime example of why I really hate tabloids.

The original University of Montreal release dates back to December, 2009: Are the effects of pornography negligible? The actual story is that the author's findings refute claims made by groups trying to demonize porn and paint its impact on society as detrimental.

But a few days later the British tabloid The Sun was the first to run it through the stupidifier (followed by the Daily Mail a day later), distorting the focus to "Oh noes we couldn't find any guys who haven't watched porn, HAHAH!".

Now here's the same recycled crap dredged up by The Mirror over three years later. And the actual story is still lost.

Is it possible to not hate tabloids? :P

[Shaley]

Wait, CONSUME porn? I was supposed to eat it this entire time?

[Spectral]

not sure what you mean. I'm sure everyone looks at porn, but really? people find it arousing? All that fake people, with surgically deformed bodies, all that fake groaning, the weird way they treat people. Its got comedy value, but thats about it. Its totally unrealistic, and its pretty unattractive.

You know there's a shitload of amateur porn, right?

[Gheld]

You know there's a shitload of amateur porn, right?

Yeah. There's no shortage of couples who are aroused by the idea of recording their sexcapades and streaming it on the internet for free.

God the 21st Century is great.

[Grizzly Willy]

You know there's a shitload of amateur porn, right?

Given the nature of, uh, sites today, I think it would be difficult to miss it.