Originally Posted by
semaphore
No it isn't. It's saying the numbers are somewhere close to this. That there's 5% chance that the real number is even lower OR higher - NOT that the numbers are completely different. If it is in fact completely different, then why can't you or sorrorior or anyone else post ANY study that shows different? Because the numbers are broadly accurately and this drivel you're spewing about the margin of error is simply pseudo intellectual garbage.
What a completely rubbish and meaningless "point". No one treats those statistics as "100%" definitely true. We don't need to. We have a high degree of confidence that the reality is somewhere close to the numbers shown, based on the available evidence. Either come back with actual evidence that it's wrong, or stop whining about its "potential" to be wrong. That you are trying to kick up a fuss based on the fact that nothing is ever absolute, shows just how intellectually bankrupt your side really is.
Not to mention the sheer hypocrisy of complaining about "its still only potentials" when your whole argument is based on the potential for error while no definitive proof of any such error exist.
---------- Post added 2013-02-11 at 11:23 AM ----------
Your history of bashing me as a "radical extremists just like my sister" every time you see me post is sufficient evidence for me. You have, again, never once showed any such "extremist world views" from me.
And again you have not shown a single post where I was biased.
Hard to see you as anything else given your rabid hatred of anyone who is passionate about gender equality.
---------- Post added 2013-02-11 at 11:23 AM ----------
How convenient for your preconceived beliefs.