[Movies] Last Movie You Saw and What You Would Rate it Out of 10

[Boricha]

I saw some weird Asian foriegn horror movie on netflix called Missing. It was weird but not scary at all on top of feeling very slow at times. 2/10

[Deleted]

In time

6/10

i thought it was a pretty interesting concept, but I found it a bit too predictable what was going to happen, but enjoyable to watch.

[Deleted]

Aliens, Enough Said 10/10
Mortal Kombat 1/10 The reason I put Aliens on.

[Clockwork Pinkie]

Spring Breakers....What the fuck did I just watch???......8/10? What a piece of shit......yea 8/10.

[Celista]

Spring Breakers....What the fuck did I just watch???......8/10? What a piece of shit......yea 8/10.

You give a film you think is a total pos 8/10?

[Deleted]

Spring Breakers....What the fuck did I just watch???......8/10? What a piece of shit......yea 8/10.

Oooooookay... Im confused.

[Deleted]

Frankenstein 1931 movie,not really familiar to these monster movies,but would give 8/10, that black and white color gave a nice touch to it.

[Shinzai]

VHS: 8/10. One of the more scary/creepy films I've seen of recent times. Also, why must people break limbs when falling down stairs so often?

[Maelle]

The newest Die Hard film.

Was kind of invited along as it was my partners little brothers "birthday" thing, and couldn't think of a good excuse. I was tired anyway and fell asleep halfway through missing about 30 minutes of the random blowing up / shooting / ramming of things plot.

The parts I watched were ok I suppose, but it's really not a genre of film I really enjoy :<

5/10

[Kelesti]

You give a film you think is a total pos 8/10?

It's either 0-1.5, or 8-10, people don't understand how a scale is actually supposed to work.

[reohh]

Spring breakers...........I'd be shocked if you could find a worse movie that had a wide release.

2/10 because at least they attempted to have some of story.

[Clockwork Pinkie]

It's either 0-1.5, or 8-10, people don't understand how a scale is actually supposed to work.

Well no it's not that it's just that his movie didn't know what the fuck it wanted to be. It's one of those independent movies that tries to be too indie. The camera work is nice, but it's just not needed, it's a party movie for the first 30 minutes, it's ATL part 2 for the last, and it's Butch Cassidy and the Sundance kids at the end, like what the hell did I just watch. I was so confused yet so fucking amazed that I just couldn't give it anything else. I sat there and watched the whole thing, then on the way home we talked about so many things wrong with the movie, it was probably the most I've talked about a movie after seeing it. I have no idea what was going on. James Franco was a reason to give it an 8/10. If you even make it to his part, because it tries to be artsy, but it just fails on that degree. It's a masterpiece of shit that desreves not to be seen and the weirdies movie I've ever seen. 2001 a Space Odyssey but with spring break. I respect what it "tried" to be, but it just failed. And the teenagers looking for a party movie will be so fucking disappointed. I gave the last twilight a pretty high score, but the movie was pretty fucking terrible, but that twist at the end was so fucking golden, especially at a midnight showing crowd. So yes, I know how the score works. It's just a very confusing movie that could get better in time....we'll see.

[Solidito]

Safety not guarenteed, went in thinking it was a different film (lol), then realised what i was actually watching. Was decent but nothing special, ending was decent.

6/10

[Stormridah]

Spring breakers...........I'd be shocked if you could find a worse movie that had a wide release.

2/10 because at least they attempted to have some of story.

so you think films/film making is only about the story?
sure i like movies with good storys like memento, shutter island, inception, fight club and many more...
but this movies wasn't made to have a great story..it was more like an arthouse film, where it's more about the pictures/colors, atmosphere, cinematography/cuts, music in association with the scenes (britney spears' everytime was really great at their brutal assaults..and also skrillex scary monsters and nice sprites and with you friends fits very well) and social questions. (the movie was also a little bit like a documentation)

but i can understand, when people who generally doesn't watch movies like this and expected a comedy or whatever, don't like it.
you found it boring cause of the thin story and dialogues?! i find movies boring, (action, comedy, whatever) which always have the same boring story and dialogues and nothing else..i've seen this "shit" a hundred times over and over again..
but spring breakers was different in every way! (yeah..also in the not really excisting story )

btw this movie got 70% at rottentomatoes (which is a fairly good score for rottentomatoes)
..and it was filmed by the same cameraman who filmed enter the void ..which is very similar (not the story) and one of my fav movies..maybe that's also why i liked it

And the teenagers looking for a party movie will be so fucking disappointed.

or just this

surely it wasn't a perfect movie, but for me it is a 7,5/10

(sorry for my bad english)

[Deleted]

Social Network - 5/10

I have actually never seen the movie before. Did not care much for it though and I found myself looking more at my kittens, iPAD and cellphone from time to time.

[Frozenbeef]

oz: The great and powerful - 6/10

Had some really good scenes like the witch becoming evil , when she shot into the village and the fireworks scene but the story was pretty basic >.<

[Deleted]

"Would you rather" - 9 - a good sort of psychological thriller movie that shows a view of the human mind in desperate situations.

I did remove 1 because none of the previous contestants who lived went to the police, which was a weird thing and kind of made you wonder. Also Sasha Grey's performance was kind of lacking. She may be good at porn movies, but she wasn't so good in a real movie.

[Velinde]

The Hunger Games - 7.5/10

A few inaccuracies, but seriously...what movie based on a book doesn't have them? I, personally, think the casting was fantastic. Overall it was pretty great and I can't wait for Catching Fire.

[Skippy88]

Olympus Has Fallen - 8/10 - As some reviewers have noted it's very much like the original Die Hard as it had action and humor. Gerald Butler did a really good job to the point I wondered why he hadn't played that type of movie before.

Robocop 2 & 3 - 5/10 After getting back from Olympus I watched both. They don't age very well especially in the graphics department. I was surprised at some of the actors/actresses that appeared in the movies like Rip Thorn, Jill Hennesey, Bradley Whitford, Stephen Root for example. The other funny part in the second was the kid that swore up a storm and fired gun. Almost like Hit-Girl almost 20 years earlier.

[Shinzai]

Sinister: 7/10

A pretty solid film all round. It's a slightly better than the average horror, but just lacking the extra bite, or creeping dread to really make it great. Worth a watch, but not astounding. It has a slight twist on the usual twist, that I liked, but again, it just needed a little more weight to its atmosphere.