Otakus like watching anime regarding minors because their highschool years weren't all that great. Its not because they're hebe/ebephiles.
We're talking about otakus not sexual predators. There's a difference.
Otakus are creepy and weird but they're not taking advantage of anyone or breaking the law.
The pathetic part is, this wouldn't be getting anywhere near the attention if it was a 24yo female dating a 12yo male. That's how retarded our society is. Pedophilia is pedophilia, one sex SHOULD NOT be immune to ridicule.
ON WEDNESDAYS WE WEAR PINK
I know how ettan rolls, and it's neither with r, nor a z *hides*
Btw, it's not bad being a pedophile. Grabbing a kid and raping his/her brains out, that's what is bad. (and you don't need to be a pedo to do it.)
But people like to think pedophile = child rapist, grab your torches and pitchforks, we found a witch to burn
Yes, poor, oppressed sexual deviants who want to have sex with children.
They're just misunderstood and unfairly hated by society.
My God, spend 10 minutes on the average forum crawling with predominantly young, internet males, they'll try and convince you the pedos are the victims.
LOL I meamt his anti otaku comments.
---------- Post added 2013-05-31 at 12:21 PM ----------
If anything alot of us are less likely to harm others.
also in my case it's OP heroes/demon kings....Ok and the usual highschool shows.
but yeah I don't judge FPS nuts...Ok not TOO much... It's a hobby like any other.
Learn to read he said "It's not bad being a pedophile".
That is not a defensible statement for normal people. Maybe for creepy internet trawlers it is, but regular people don't think pedophilia is okay.
Because it's not. Period.
He equated it to witch hunts. In no way are pedophiles a poor, persecuted group.
What's next, PSAs for diaper snipers? A new take on "It gets better" for those poor, bullied crib creepers?
Maybe some sensitivity training brought to you by NAMBLA?
That's illegal in basis, no matter how you look at it. Its a form of child abuse. To say people are "dating" is to imply that two people have a mature, consenting, "sexual" based relationship (whether or not sex acts actually occur is irrelevant to this point - dating is not playing some sort of childs game). A 12 year old is not legally considered old enough to choose to be in such a situation. No matter how you look at it, the 24 year old is abusing that child psychologically and emotionally by even implying or letting the child believe that a "Dating" relationship is occurring. The 24 year-old is in comparison to the child a "grown up" and thus is a type of "authority figure", and thus such a relationship is, and should be, in every way illegal. If a 24 year old were taken to court, and held on to the notion that they had a "dating" relationship with a 12 year old, the court would without a doubt in my mind, set a precedent by declaring that the 24 year old is abusing the 12 year old.
Actual sexual acts are irrelevant to this case (and do really believe that the 24 year old and the 12 year old would not at some point start to sexually experiment with the other?). It is child abuse.
Case dismissed!
"Love has no age." said the pedophilic 24 year old dating a 12 year old.
Lemme date someone half my age - 9 and a half year old. HEY IT'S OKAY. WE'RE IN LOVE.