wonder how many additional helms this thread has sold? I want one now.
wonder how many additional helms this thread has sold? I want one now.
Stating an opinion as fact does not make it fact. Opinions are not fact. So don't be stupid and make a fool of yourself by trying to pass off your opinion as fact.
I find it more sad that a paying subscriber can not expect a subscription driven game to have those items that are available for sale in store... also available through other means - including gameplay and even black market auction house.
I can understand a F2P game having few items that you can not get through any other means than paying directly for it. But I can not see how a subscription based game that is now apparently reworking their business model ... is not able to then implement a system where the subscribers at least have a choice to pay more.. or earn the items ingame.
But since BLizzard is now working on new model.. I think its only very fair to ask them why they are not ready to implement such a system in their subscription based game.
Well that I can agree with.I look no more ignorant with my baseless claims than the majority of people in this thread then, I guess.
This only applies to people that actually progress further, which is a small % overall.5 man dungeons have not been core content since Blizzard made them catch-up mechanics. The moment they made the iLvl of the gear in new 5mans rival the same expansion's previous raid tiers, they became pointless after getting the gear you wanted.
Well considering we haven't seen those since, I'd hazard to say blizzard realized how absurdly easy it was to gear with those. I would say todays 5mans are more relevant than those, especially because of challenge modes.Remember the Hour of Twilight dungeons? Instant epics that beat Firelands normal gear. Once I had my gear from them, the only reason I did them again was for easy valor. Now there are many ways to get valor so I don't need to run the same few dungeons mindlessly.
I must admit, never seen this happen. Though I have heard about it on the forums, and it really confuses me. Who would kick people just because they have spent money on an item they might like?
That is like kicking a person out of a bar for ordering a beer of a different brand than what all others would drink. Really, I wouldn't go an call people pathetic for it, even though it seems to fit well. Maybe a little envious? I have no idea, it's just pixels that's different from what you pick up from some rotten corpse.
FOMO: "Fear Of Missing Out", also commonly known as people with a mental issue of managing time and activities, many expecting others to fit into their schedule so they don't miss out on things to come. If FOMO becomes a problem for you, do seek help, it can be a very unhealthy lifestyle..
People have been kicked for no reason since 'Vote Kick' was implemented. Probably the most common is when a group of guys from a guild get into LFR and theyre after particular drops so they kick out all the guys of the same class. Or they just kick out players to make room for their buddies. This has been common since Cata.
LFR kick is always being abused, its kinda interesting that there is more uproar against protesters using the kick feature than against the guilds who abused it against innocent players.
Someone please list the reasons they ran the ZA and ZG five mans. I'm looking for reasons other than "I needed the gear catch-up" LFR does that, "I needed my points capped" dailies/scenarios/lfr/raids/previous 5 mans all satisfy that function perfectly fine, "I wanted to see the new content" this only applies to the first time you complete it, "i wanted to practice playing my character" LFR/scenarios/previous 5 mans all still work perfectly fine for this, and "I wanted the mounts" if this is your reason it would imply that any added 5 mans without unique mounts/pets are irrelevant.
Stilllllll waiting on that citation, buddy.
Players who wear the healm might as well wear a Tshirt that says "I love the new Blizzard Cashshop"
Ur basically advertising that u approve of this latest move forward in the game. Its far more than just wanting to look pretty, u r telling everyone u want a Cashshop.
Therefore u make yourself an obvious target for the players who r aggressively against the cash-shop.
Stating an opinion as fact does not make it fact. Opinions are not fact. So don't be stupid and make a fool of yourself by trying to pass off your opinion as fact.
There is a problem with this line of thought. People in this game want things to be available in game, they want to work for them, achieve them in that sense. If you start putting "cool" things into a store model, it removes any sense of that progression, of that development, and of that accomplishment.
Now I know that there are only a few items there now. But if Blizzard sees this as a success, they will seek to put more effort there. If there is more effort (and the the subsequent items) it takes more out of the game and puts more into a store.
That is probably one of the primary reasons most people are getting fed up with that type of model, because there is no accomplishment (for those that seek that).