Originally Posted by
Djalil
Let me help you.
Hold my hand.
You're talking of "pandas" or "demons" as if those "subjects" by themselves would be an index of something's maturity.
"Demons" don't make a game grim, "pandas" don't make it childish.
HOWEVER
Pandas with "epicurean" and "bouncy" traits, with a "nomnom language" do.
And to be honest, what really im struggling to understand and really is hard to decipher, is how you can't see that.
I understand opinions are personal, you can like pandaren for the very same reasons I don't like them that's fine. But their traits, their language, their shape, sorry, they are hints to me that the pandaren weren't "taken seriously" when implemented.
I don't like that, I don't like pandaren in this shape.
I would have love them hunched and feral, like furbolgs.
Am I a lol panda hater?