Which of course be said of anyone who owns or operates anything that when misused can be dangerous to self or others. Although we sit here in a world where things like soda portions and table salt and kinder eggs are deemed too dangerous for mere peons to be trusted with, I can see why it's so difficult to explain the risks of messy liberty on behalf of the 2nd Amendment.
"One of the teenagers, a 16-year-old, was arrested yesterday and faces a charge of illegal use of a weapon and one count of possession of a stolen firearm."
"Police say dozens of gunshots were fired at the home. Capt. Aaron Rapp says more than one gun was involved in the barrage of gunfire."
"The weapon was a .357 revolver and we are still seeking an automatic weapon related to the case."
"All testimony and physical evidence point to an accidental shooting and foul play is not suspected at this time,” Arango said. “[The Department of Children and Families] has been notified and will follow-up with the family since they live in Jacksonville. There are no criminal charges at this time since the shooting was accidental."
I've got an idea, let's post links to situations that would not be prevented by gun control legislation. That'll be productive.
This thread is a lot more civil lately.
Both sides are firmly planted though. It's a waste of time to try and prove things. Can't prove a negative, can't prove deterrence figures, can't prove if guns in the hands of the police or military save or endanger lives.
Sounds contrived, but it's like trying to prove one religion is right and another is wrong. You just can't really do it and you won't get any converts.
I, personally, don't agree with you but I appreciate your input.
I will throw this out there. I believe that stronger support for gun rights comes from a larger push for gun control. Ironic, but that's my suspicion.
- - - Updated - - -
[QUOTE=Tinykong;31418958]"One of the teenagers, a 16-year-old, was arrested yesterday and faces a charge of illegal use of a weapon and one count of possession of a stolen firearm."
"Police say dozens of gunshots were fired at the home. Capt. Aaron Rapp says more than one gun was involved in the barrage of gunfire."
"The weapon was a .357 revolver and we are still seeking an automatic weapon related to the case."
"All testimony and physical evidence point to an accidental shooting and foul play is not suspected at this time,” Arango said. “[The Department of Children and Families] has been notified and will follow-up with the family since they live in Jacksonville. There are no criminal charges at this time since the shooting was accidental."
US will never see confiscation.
High round count and "shoulder thing that goes up" legislation is particularly useless. Banning an AR15 and not a Mini14 or a pump action 12 gauge is ludicrous. Particularly since handguns are the primary weapon choice of criminals and suicides, yet rifles take all the heat.
Oh good. We're moving the goal posts from "You haven't proved it will work" to "It's not enforceable!!!"
Here's one study that found "firearm theft rates were dramatically lower in States with safe storage laws."
- - - Updated - - -
You could say that about every single law on the books. What's your point?
Eat yo vegetables
You provided no evidence of the claim you made. You showed that state's with safe storage laws have lower rates of firearm theft.
You didn't prove that safe storage laws reduce firearm thefts. You used a spotlight fallacy to make that generalization.
Which is:
hurr durr
You seem to be embarrassingly confused. I did provide evidence for the claim. I didn't prove the claim to be true.
Since I've provided evidence for the claim, and you've provided nothing but failed claims of fallacy, I'd say I've got a leg up.
- - - Updated - - -
So people only obey laws when they feel they might get caught?
Eat yo vegetables
You provided a tenuous correlative link that doesn't prove the claim you made. Is that seriously the best you can do these days?
Talk about embarrassing.
- - - Updated - - -
Safe storage laws are completely unenforceable. You're relying on people doing the right thing because they want to.
Safe storage laws are also useless if they render the gun functionally inaccessible or inoperable at the very moment it will be needed.
Training is not as rare as many seem to think. Even in "shall issue" states, someone that wants to carry is most likely going to need to show completion of some sort of basic gun safety course. Not sure there is a problem that need an additional training requirement, let alone a federal one, to solve. Too often it seems the real point of the exercise is to render lawful ownership of a gun so impractical, so wrought with legal uncertainty, that citizens simply abandon the notion altogether.