Wait, was it really rape? She consented to the marriage and knew what was coming right. Just a bit rough no?
Guess torture doesn't either, since if you look at a picture of the crossbow shots, most of them weren't immediate killshots.
You people really should just purge "SJW" from your lexicon. Every time I see the acronym SJW, it always comes from an imbecile.
The whores with 3 mins of screentime?
If theon can overcome his issues in month sansa should be able to do it some hours.
Really people are different and sobbing miserable people are only ertaining for so long and there are people exspecially heroes and heroines in fiction who can shrug shit like that off like its nothing some even bullets.
Last edited by mmocd79acbf389; 2015-05-21 at 07:32 PM.
You just stole the don't say thug argument, and it didn't work for thug, and it won't work for SJW.
- - - Updated - - -
See the SJWs only see themselves as the nobles, the whores don't count into their feeling as they can't see themselves as such. But Sansa was what they'd imagine they would be.
When you see someone in a thread making the same canned responses over and over, click their name, click view forum posts, and see if they are a troll. Then don't feed them."Gamer" is not a bad word. I identify as a gamer. When calling out those who persecute and harass, the word you're looking for is "asshole." @_DonAdams
No, it really doesn't. I am not an activist for anything. I just think you retards are starting to get ridiculous with your childish language. People won't always agree with your thinking. That doesn't make them a SJW. It just make them have a different perspective that you, and people would do well to at least try to understand the perspective of others without immediately marginalizing their opinion.
[Infracted]
Last edited by Endus; 2015-05-22 at 06:08 AM.
Well, I'm not really angry at the rape itself. I'm kinda ticked off that they use it as a cheap thing to shock people.
Quoting Robert Jackson Bennett:
“Now instead of raping a buxom, weeping young woman, your Extremely Bad Dude is now raping a terrified six year old boy. Does it still feel like it deserves to be there? To use the usual fictional rape apologist arguments, there’s no reason this scene shouldn’t exist. Child rape exists, and no doubt happens in times of war. It probably happens even more in third world countries that are at war. Historically speaking, I’m sure there have been thousands of child rapes since the dawn of humanity. Maybe millions. Practically speaking, it would be remiss not to include a child rape scene or two, right? It happens. We must be truthful to reality. It’s our duty. Or, wait – is it possible you’re using this horrific, degrading, monstrous act as window dressing?”
Forgot to add the link to the source of the quote: http://www.robertjacksonbennett.com/...g-a-rape-scene
People saying it was pointless and forced are just looking for a reason to hate on it and in my opinion might not even watch the show. Yes it was a horrible to watch scene, it was meant to be, Ramsey is horrific. But the part that made it not pointless is the fact that he is securing his own place as heir, we know the thing about maidens having to be pure in those times, and the sooner Ramsey impregnates her and gets his own Stark baby the stronger his claim is. Ramsey knows this and went about it in his usual horrific demented way. So no, it isn't just "shock value."
Can everyone please purge lexicon from there vocabulary. I mean come on guys.