There's been a lot of explanations for how Trump could suddenly pull out of a nose dive, even people pointing to examples. Examples of course are very much the exception and not the rule. And the more stupid things Trump says, the further and further away we get from the possibility that this election turns out like those, since they all involved extraordinary circumstances. Clinton would have to kill someone in broad daylight for all to see to kill her campaign.
(In before "but she has killed someone!" *insert conspiracies*)
Clinton just has to keep running her campaign as-is, smile for the camera and keep going. Trump is doing a good enough job sending his election up in flames.Lots of ways for Clinton to sabotage her own election too.
Plus, people who support Trump are motivated to vote. People who say "probably Clinton because she is not Trump"? Not so much.
You know what any other nominee would have done in response to the Khan incident? Gone to the grave of the son and put an American flag and flowers on it. That would have kicked all of the Trump nay sayers in the nuts right there. Instead he just proved them right, that he's a jackass with no control.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
SO Trump is advocating more killing of people now?
The restrictions placed on certain types of speech that promotes violence as well as the on/off regulations about various types of weapons disagree with you.
This is true, but that doesn't mean that there can be no limitations or restrictions placed on, for example, First or Second Amendment protections. Because as I said, there are already and there absolutely should be.
You will like this.
"Roger Stone Confirms That He's In Communication With Julian Assange"
ROGER STONE: Well, it could be any number of things. I actually have communicated with Assange. I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation but there's no telling what the October surprise may be.
https://mediamatters.org/video/2016/...assange/212261
Last edited by Cthulhu 2020; 2016-08-09 at 10:50 PM.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
"I guess Trump only technically said that second amendment people could do something about Clinton appointing a SCOTUS judge, so it's teeeeeeeeeeeechnically not inciting violence, even though it pretty much is. After all, he didn't say "You guys should go shoot Clinton in the fucking face!""
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Of course, Trump didn't tell people to go kill Hillary, he merely suggested they could kill her to stop her from appointing a liberal supreme court judge because he knows he's losing a lot of down ticket seats for Republicans and a nomination will make it through a Democrat controlled senate easily.
Thumbs up good buddy!
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"