Originally Posted by
Zarc
Well yes, obviously. That has nothing to do with my point.
You speculate on what will happen, okay, cool. Yes, I agree, that is likely how it will go down. Still nothing to do with the point made in my post to which you replied.
Again: Naga rising from the sea while we're at war with each other at the end of the expansion would've been a great excuse for ending the war, calling a truce, and preparing for the next big thing, leading into an expansion where Queen Azshara gets the Arthas-treatment with an expansion focused around her, with her face on the box. Not giving her that treatment is, in my opinion, a missed opportunity. That's a shame, because she is the last big iconic villain left that deserves, and could pull off, such an expansion theme.
There's no land northwest of the Maelstrom, that's where Nazjatar is located. They could have built a story where it is raised from the sea, expanded into a continent in it's own right, and where Queen Azshara would be featured heavily like Arthas was, where we get to explore her 10,000 year old history in detail and where we fight her Naga like we fought the Scourge. Instead they will feature her as a mere cogwheel, puzzle piece or pawn in the larger story of the Battle for Azeroth. They could include her Naga in the story of the Battle for Azeroth, as may be logical, but left her personally out, not giving her an underwhelming send-off, but rather use that opportunity not only as a piece of the Battle for Azeroth story but as the final part of a long, long build-up to our final confrontation with her. If Battle for Azeroth ends with us killing, or rather sealing off in some prison, N'Zoth that would make her story all the more epic. Her agenda would now be all about her own ambitions, no longer anyone's pawn, much like the Lich King once broke from the Burning Legion. Not doing this, again in my opinion, is a shame.
- - - Updated - - -
True, let's hope not!