Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ...
2
3
4
5
6
... LastLast
  1. #61
    Banned cqwrteur's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    It's called a faulty generalization.
    It is called truth.

  2. #62
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,409
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    It is called truth.
    Truths don't come from jumping to conclusions.

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Kazela View Post
    Oh noes, that terrible flying mount boogeyman...it ruined everything!
    Ruined the entire ground content, yeah.

  4. #64
    Banned cqwrteur's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    Truths don't come from jumping to conclusions.
    Conclusions? Well. What is the basic idea of Darwin's evolution? Community is just the result of surroundings.

  5. #65
    No, Blizzard shouldn't listen to people who created their accounts on a biggest fan-made forum about their game in July 2017, because they are either troll/fake accounts, or just utter newbs.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by Hctaz View Post
    Ruined the entire ground content, yeah.
    It didn't, but ok. Not continuing down that path from here because that's a zombie horse that still being ridden around and beaten on this forum on a daily basis.

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by getupkid55 View Post
    Why would they do otherwise?

    Because there are idiots on the MMO-Champ forums asking them to put in features from retail, for some stupid unknown reason?
    Some of the things that some players have wanted to get changed in Vanilla isn't for an unknown reason. Take class balance and talents for one example. In Vanilla you essentially had 'trap class specs' and 'trap talents', which many would define as not being vastly inferior, but would be labeled by those players as 'there for fun' or 'left in vanilla WoW for versatility sake'. When in all honesty, yes after you are level capped at 60 you need to avoid playing as a certain spec to be competitive in raiding and/or bgs, and you need to avoid talent choices that will significantly make your character worse at performing when fighting against/with players who didn't take them.

    Not everything people have wanted for a better Vanilla were for the sake of convenience, but to not provide the illusion of many competitive choices. As it stands right now if Vanilla WoW is released in a purist form there will be classes that are only allowed to play competitively in one spec. I wouldn't call that an unknown reason to want that aspect changed.

  8. #68
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,409
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    Conclusions? Well. What is the basic idea of Darwin's evolution? Community is just the result of surroundings.
    Therein lies your problem. It isn't static and binary, just look at the threads popping up every minute. Not every Retail customer is out to get you, and there are non-Retail Vanilla advocates who want to change just as much to the end product. If you don't believe me look at Ornyx's survey. No changes to Vanilla gameplay.

  9. #69
    Banned cqwrteur's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,932
    Think why internet forum is always filled with toxicity and trolling? Isn't it surroundings that advocate toxicity/trolling?

  10. #70
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,409
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    Think why internet forum is always filled with toxicity and trolling? Isn't it surroundings that advocate toxicity/trolling?
    I'm not sure you even realize what you're doing. Generalization is a practice of trolls.

    Whatever the case, I'm done here. They've decided to listen to both customers and potential customers. In the end it's a business, and businesses take feedback from everyone.

  11. #71
    Banned cqwrteur's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    Therein lies your problem. It isn't static and binary, just look at the threads popping up every minute. Not every Retail customer is out to get you, and there are non-Retail Vanilla advocates who want to influence just as much change to the end product.
    LOL. It isn't static which does not mean it is not relatively static. If you deny relatively static, you are against the basic law of physics.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    I'm not sure you even realize what you're doing. Generalization is a practice of trolls.
    Generalization? LOL. That question even exists in Chinese Graduate National Exam. You think exam is trolling?

  12. #72
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,409
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    LOL. It isn't static which does not mean it is not relatively static. If you deny relatively static, you are against the basic law of physics.
    This isn't physics.




    Generalization? LOL. That question even exists in Chinese Graduate National Exam. You think exam is trolling?
    You don't understand what a fallacy in an argument is, do you?

  13. #73
    Elemental Lord callipygoustp's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    8,668
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    no democracy plz. Why should a game company care what their players QQ about when they make a new game? Let blizzard themselves decide what to do.
    I have no problem with that. But, if they are going to watch a poll, I'd like to see it regimented a bit more.

  14. #74
    Dumb thread is dumb. Never change classic purists. Never change.
    Khadgar: Prepare to heroically CTRL-E through the portal with me!

    Quote Originally Posted by Hooky View Post
    yeah wow cool..how about raising the valor cap consider WoD isn't that far away? 1000 valor points gets u a lollipop and kick in the nutsack these days! Back in my day we could get a bucket of candy and a pet ferret with that sort of points!
    Quote Originally Posted by Herecius View Post
    QUICKLY FRIENDS, TO THE HYPERBOLEMOBILE!

  15. #75
    Banned cqwrteur's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    This isn't physics.






    You don't understand what a fallacy in an argument is, do you?
    LOL. Fallacy in an argument. Hey!


    [Infracted]

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    This isn't physics.
    Nothing ISN'T physics. Or you wont have your internet connection to connect to this forum.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Doomchicken View Post
    Dumb thread is dumb. Never change classic purists. Never change.
    LOL. Truth definitely never changes. Or it wont be truth.

    Just go to debunk Einstein's relative theory because the law of physics changes over time. LOL
    Last edited by God Save The King; 2017-11-16 at 11:11 PM.

  16. #76
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,409
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    LOL. Fallacy in an argument. Hey!
    To summarize what you've said: "Current players are NOT willing to play on classic, which is what they told you during the past 10 years. They think classic wow is too bad to play."

    Which is absolute bullshit. It's not impossible to enjoy two games.

  17. #77
    Banned cqwrteur's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    To summarize what you've said: "Current players are NOT willing to play on classic, which is what they told you during the past 10 years. They think classic wow is too bad to play."

    Which is absolute bullshit. It's not impossible to enjoy two games.
    Hey! You think this is bullshit? Same with old models. You think they are too bad and should be removed right right?

  18. #78
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,409
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    Hey! You think this is bullshit? Same with old models. You think they are too bad and should be removed right right?
    Where did I say that?

    edit: or not, they removed the older ones on Retail
    Last edited by Polybius; 2017-11-16 at 10:48 PM.

  19. #79
    Banned cqwrteur's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius View Post
    Where did I say that?

    P.S. Retail still has old models available.
    PS: It doesn't. BE/NE/Draenei old models are gone.

  20. #80
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,409
    Quote Originally Posted by cqwrteur View Post
    PS: It doesn't. BE/NE/Draenei old models are gone.
    So where did I say I want old models removed? Or that I don't want to play Retail and Classic?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •