Being around 6 foot or just over is quite good because you're taller than most without looking lanky, also the height where clothes tend to fit best. You're also at a height where getting a decent body oisn't too intensive.
Being around 6 foot or just over is quite good because you're taller than most without looking lanky, also the height where clothes tend to fit best. You're also at a height where getting a decent body oisn't too intensive.
Not to me it isn't.
Take Tom Cruise for example. His face + body, charisma, voice etc. I find him more attractive than most actors.
My love interests have been both taller and shorter than myself as well.
Everyone's got measurements on what they are attracted to in a potential partner though.
194cm here, and while my height hasn't hurt me, it certainly isn't enough on its own to draw in womanly attention.
Fight me, manlets!
everything else being equal, being taller than average is an advantage
it's not about whether you prefer humor or whatever else to height
Yeah, if it's the height of all your money stacked up.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
Some of the replies here are really just ridiculous... Won't even consider a guy that's the same height(let alone shorter...)
Even with everyone being entitled to their own opinion and all.. yadda yadda
It's patheticly shallow.
Height is the most important visual thing about a man.
Women are incredibly affected by it in terms of sexual attractiveness, especially at first sight.
A woman would rather meet a guy that is tall, ugly and poor than a guy who is short, pretty and self sufficient.
"One of the most", yes, it is, for most women.
"The most", no, that all important criteria is the size of a man's wallet.
That's universal.
"That shit went down faster than a gold digger on a dying rich dude".
I think part of it is perception that the male who is seen as the protector of the family should look like he could provide that protection. I'm not speaking so much as literal as I am instinctual. Personally, I find it more attractive to find a man who is about a head taller than me. I don't like too tall or too short. I don't see it as shallow to describe what you find yourself attracted to. It's the equivalent of boob size or hair color, height and weight, habits and interests. If you don't like reading, dating someone who does nothing but read won't be attractive. If you like gaming and the other doesn't, it's not a turn on. If you are 6' and you like someone who is taller, dating someone who is 5'8" won't do it for you.
Ever notice guys who are usually really quick to defend their taste in a woman's weight or skin color usually aren't as quick to defend a woman's taste in height?
- - - Updated - - -
I had no problem with women even when I was a poor college student. My financial status has had very little effect on my romantic life. Making good money now has affected the status of the women I date, but it hasn't increased or decreased the amount of interest from women.
from my understanding it's a bit more complicated than height matters or doesn't matter
while lacking height is severely limiting to one's attractiveness being very tall might even be considered negative for some women
there's also implication with the woman's height: usually women prefer men roughly 10cm taller than them while a man being shorter than them is a 'letdown'
regardless attractiveness is a matter of multiple factors and one can compensate lacking in any single one of them with others