MEDIA advocates for violence... again.

[Machismo]

Yeah I prefer strong nation states over statelessness. I agree with all neo-liberal policies except border policy.

I don't think being a 100% ideological purist is a good thing.

You don't believe in their economic policies, either, because it goes against the fundamental principles of laissez faire economics. That's like saying Obama is a conservative, except for his democratic socialist views.

[Dmitro]

I don't think being a 100% ideological purist is a good thing.

nuance is a banned word in leftists minds, their brains operate in good and evil category ( obviously they are on the side of good)

[Machismo]

Lets talk about this know, you've dedicated about 6 posts for my "not native" enough English and now you cant even properly build a sentence ( happened twice!)

something aint clear, I guess youre the one born outside while trying to label people around you that for obvious mental reasons

My sentence was fine, you simply did not like it. I also noticed you dodged the question, again.

I asked you a question earlier, I'm testing a theory.

What was the main reason behind the Southern Secession when Lincoln was elected?

As for me, I was born and raised in California, were you born and raised in Memphis? You have only stated that you are from there, and that is dancing around the question.

I think you are just upset that I nailed who your other account happens to be.

- - - Updated - - -

nuance is a banned word in leftists minds, their brains operate in good and evil category ( obviously they are on the side of good)

I'm not a leftist, I'm a small-government conservative.

[PC2]

You don't believe in their economic policies, either, because it goes against the fundamental principles of laissez faire economics. That's like saying Obama is a conservative, except for his democratic socialist views.

You know neo-liberals are not anarcho-capitalists right? Neo-liberal means you mostly focus on a laissez faire business engine but still have basic welfare programs and executive branch services(police, military, etc) to maintain security.

[Machismo]

You know neo-liberals are not anarcho-capitalists right? Neo-liberal means you mostly focus on a laissez faire business engine but still have basic welfare programs and executive branch services(police, military, etc) to maintain security.

And nationalism gets in the way of laissez faire economics. It really is that simple. It's an unnecessary infringement on the free markets, and does not promote capitalistic growth within the marketplace.

[PC2]

It's usually a matter of consistency. There is usually a reason why an ideology has a certain stance, and those are based in a deeper understanding and the often long historical academic evolution and philosophy of an ideology. Ideologies are based on certain principles, which means that those principles get applied across the board, else there is usually a manner of hypocrisy going on. Rational humans don't like contradictions in their viewpoints and like reasons. Those seem to matter less and less nowadays though, people just cherrypick their 'facts' now.

If someone doesn't adhere fully to an ideology there is usually a pretty good chance they're hypocrits and don't have a strong reasoning for their opinions or don't apply certain principles across the board. There is of course the (slim) chance someone fully developed their own ideology, but... good luck having your own ideology stand up against those which had academic and philosophical support of great minds over many ages.

The problem is that every ideology ever thought up lacks perfection, every single one has flaws. Flaws that needed to be corrected in some way. So until a society invents a new ideology that causes every parameter of that society to improve and never get set back, then you have to accept that all ideologies contain error.

[luckydevours]

THIS GAVE ME CHILLS
...

absolutely new low, totally disgusting and honestly horryfying.
...

Triggering intensifies!

Or are you just pretending to be mad?! Because your signature makes me think so:

CCC is the new KKK

Ku Klux Klan thought black people are inferior having no direct evidence, Climate Change Cult believes in humans impact on climate without any particular piece of evidence. If you disagree - you are a "denier" of "obvious things"

Imo you're either a hypocrit or just trolling. Really hard to distinguish from this post alone ...

[Ehrenpanzer]

In other words you're excusing the behaviour ergo pro-violence.

Welcome to modern liberalism... where free speech means you can only say what they want to hear and violence is fine unless its against them

[Rustedsaint]

Won’t condem violence? Wow. Your really disgusting. If only your family could see what you post online to be an edge lord.

You just realized this? He literally agreed that the people who were shot in the Las Vegas shooting don’t deserve sympathy since they were probably trump supporters.
Ontopic Using violence to try and change politics will never work and only create more negative sterotypes

[volescue]

youre pro-violence, thanks for letting us know, unfortunately we disagree on that, for example I support politics and democracy, not violence, like you and the defacethenation do

This is the major issue I have with "#PunchANazi". Does it feel good to punch a Nazi? Probably. But if anything you are making them into a sort of martyr for their cause and emboldening their base.

[D3thray]

I mean while it might theoretically come to revolution from the entitled supporters of #PunchANazi, they'd have to get out from behind their keyboards and off their chairs first. I don't see it happening. I'll listen to anyone argue anything but as soon as they want to hurt people they disagree with, that's where it crosses the line for me.

[Ragetacular]

Have the Russian trolls infiltrated a random video game website?

My column:

[szechuan]

I hate victim blaming. That being said, the GoP tacitly endorses violence these days. They have no issue with a President who encourages his supporters to assault detractors at his rally. Not to mention a member of their ranks who assaulted a reporter. I’d say the host isn’t wrong that there are some politicians who are at the very least encouraging violence.

That being said, anyone who gets violent against their fellow citizens, regardless of who they follow politically, should be condemned. Justifying their actions with whataboutisms doesn’t help anyone.

the ones who aren't Alt-Right and a White Nationalist or a Nazi are supposedly now Moderates of the Republican Party.

[omfgreally]

The faux outrage is hilarious. Conservatives and conservative pundits spent 8 years advocating for political violence against Obama, and often against federal law enforcement, they ran an election of 2016 where their rallying cry was political violence against the opposition candidate.

Ah, WHAT? I don't know what country or "source" you got that from, but I'm calling you out on all of these.

you can't call everyone that hated Obama, conservatives and political violence? Trust me no one with a brain wanted to make him a martyr.

You just basically said conservatives were going around killing and injuring Cops?! when did that happen? I do recall BLM saying "Pigs in a blanket, fry'em like bacon."

rallying cry was political violence against who? Last time I checked locking up known murderers and crooks like the clintons isn't "political violence" and Burnie wasn't it the left and it's crazies that ran him off the stage?

DUDE, lay off the CNN crackpipe and MSN B.S. because you sound like you are from the F'n moon.

Oh, yeah a little known fun fact. It was the left and it's loons that both "Republican member of Congress and House Majority Whip Steve Scalise" that was shot by you guessed it, a left extremists and "Rand Paul" was attacked by a crazy leftist

So, show me the news in the past year, not 15 years ago, not 35 years ago, THIS PAST YEAR! where a member of the left was killed or injured by right extremists. I can wait...........................................

But I also know that you can't have argument with an leftist ideologue. You know that Soviet Russia cold war brainwashing is some powerful stuff.

[Dezerte]

Climate change is a global issue that affects everyone in the world and the future of the human race.

I suppose it can be argued that violence is justified against those who actively try to stop any effort to mitigate the consequences of that. But violence begets violence, as they say.

[omfgreally]

Climate change is a global issue that affects everyone in the world and the future of the human race.

I suppose it can be argued that violence is justified against those who actively try to stop any effort to mitigate the consequences of that. But violence begets violence, as they say.

Take it up with China first. Also if you cared more about human pollution than climate change, you would be about 5.3% there...

Also did you know that most people that chant and tout "Climate change" are the people that do not recycle and are most likely to throw crap like styrofoam cups out their car windows, I know because I keep having to pick them up out of my road and ditch.

START HERE Then we'll talk.

[Kiri]

Ah, WHAT? I don't know what country or "source" you got that from, but I'm calling you out on all of these.

you can't call everyone that hated Obama, conservatives and political violence? Trust me no one with a brain wanted to make him a martyr.

You just basically said conservatives were going around killing and injuring Cops?! when did that happen? I do recall BLM saying "Pigs in a blanket, fry'em like bacon."

rallying cry was political violence against who? Last time I checked locking up known murderers and crooks like the clintons isn't "political violence" and Burnie wasn't it the left and it's crazies that ran him off the stage?

DUDE, lay off the CNN crackpipe and MSN B.S. because you sound like you are from the F'n moon.

Oh, yeah a little known fun fact. It was the left and it's loons that both "Republican member of Congress and House Majority Whip Steve Scalise" that was shot by you guessed it, a left extremists and "Rand Paul" was attacked by a crazy leftist

So, show me the news in the past year, not 15 years ago, not 35 years ago, THIS PAST YEAR! where a member of the left was killed or injured by right extremists. I can wait...........................................

But I also know that you can't have argument with an leftist ideologue. You know that Soviet Russia cold war brainwashing is some powerful stuff.

Charlottesville does come to mind, actually. People got lucky that no one died during the Pizzagate thing, too. Republican house representative bodyslams reporter. Plus, I don't think that there is any proof that the attack on Rand Paul was politically motivated. The attacker denies it and, apparently, he has told Rand Paul the reason for it right when it happened. But the senator has decided not to tell anyone, either to not stoke to flames or to stoke them. Can't tell, ironically.

I don't really think the other guy was right, either. But, again, ignoring the incidents where 'your people' do wrong while trying to present the other side as the worst is exactly the king of thing that creates a climate of violence in the first place. If you present the left as full of crazies that will attack others over their political opinion, then that makes those abusing them, physically or not, feel justified. Then that means it is cool to publicly call people mentally deranged for disagreeing with you, or play with the lives of others for your political agenda. Because those people are 'lefties', and therefore, enemies.

[Dezerte]

Take it up with China first.

China is actually doing more to combat climate change than the US. Not that it matters, because a "you first"-mentality is silly.

[Dmitro]

I hate victim blaming. That being said, the GoP tacitly endorses violence these days.

Then its so weird that no dems were attacked from 08-17, but 2 reps were assaulted only during 2017, GOP's fault for sure bro1

- - - Updated - - -

Climate change is a global issue that affects everyone in the world and the future of the human race.

Oh, now people are deserved to be assaulted cause they are not religious believers in climate change (:

so jihadistic of you

[Dezerte]

Oh, now people are deserved to be assaulted cause they are not religious believers in climate change (:

so jihadistic of you

Totally, I pray to Gaia everyday and I always wear bio-degradable underwear.