Trump Supporter's I got a serious legit question for you.

[szechuan]

Ever heard of a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Keep begging and wishing for Neo-Nazis to grow then they just might.

Every hear of Fake News?

Begging? It's already happening. It's okay if you're ignorant I understand.

[Felya]

Ever heard of a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Keep begging and wishing for Neo-Nazis to grow then they just might.

I’ll go with them just being right... Here is a hint, people who become Nazis, when being accused of being Nazis... are Nazis.

Are you telling me... that if someone calls you a shit eater enough, you will start eating shit? Because, if your Nazi logic is to be believed, the solution to the problem you have, is simply change the word Nazi, to shit eater. That way, we can have all the closeted Nazis eating shit. That would just be hilarious...

[Theodarzna]

You do realise that what happens in EU is not ONLY there its pretty much ALL of the western world that is like that. I imagine that the US can be somewhat shielded since you have been a target for many people to emigrate to. But im pretty sure that people will start to look at options if Trump gets his agenda trhough.

In the end it doesn't matter. The places from which one can harvest humans grows smaller each year, meaning the flesh farms are disappearing rapidly. It also comes with the unfortunate moral implications that the EU can never allow Africa or the Middle East to adopt their system, in a quasi bondage these places have to be kept terrible by EU standards to motivate migration. Which might explain some curious foreign policy moves honestly.

One way or another the low fertility rate will be reckoned with because migrants are a short-term answer.

[Tijuana]

What does Trump have to do in order for you to not support him anymore?

Not trolling,baiting or whatever you wish to call it. I am 100% serious.

Nobody needs to support Trump, guy. He already won. Your next chance will be in 2020. Until then, barring his death or impeachment, he doesn't factually need any support from the public to do his job.

[Jtbrig7390]

Nobody needs to support Trump, guy. He already won. Your next chance will be in 2020. Until then, barring his death or impeachment, he doesn't factually need any support from the public to do his job.

That was a really poor attempt to deflect from the question I asked... Him winning is not the topic at hand.

[Tijuana]

That was a really poor attempt to deflect from the question I asked... Him winning is not the topic at hand.

No, it's right on target. You are asking what it would take for his supporters to stop supporting him, and I pointed out that it doesn't matter, as he already won. I truly don't understand where I lost you, because it's a basic point, imo.

[BrerBear]

That was a really poor attempt to deflect from the question I asked... Him winning is not the topic at hand.

TJ can’t answer because it will prevent him from moving the goalposts later.

[Felya]

That was a really poor attempt to deflect from the question I asked... Him winning is not the topic at hand.

No, it isn’t. He gave an honest answer. There is nothing wrong with saying nothing.

- - - Updated - - -

TJ can’t answer because it will prevent him from moving the goalposts later.

Whe you ask someone, what it will take for you to do X. Them replying with nothing, does answer the question.

[Dextroden]

That was a really poor attempt to deflect from the question I asked... Him winning is not the topic at hand.

No. The topic is a thinly veiled political bashing thread the mods don't care about closing.

[Theodarzna]

No. The topic is a thinly veiled political bashing thread the mods don't care about closing.

Its this entire forum, 35% of the posts on the first page have Trumps name in the title. More than that are Trump-related. I think Donald Trump is the only topic anyone ever speaks about in this forum.

[Elegiac]

Its this entire forum, 35% of the posts on the first page have Trumps name in the title. More than that are Trump-related. I think Donald Trump is the only topic anyone ever speaks about in this forum.

In a forum discussing current political events, one of the most significant and disturbing political developments relevant to Americans in living memory frequently comes up. Shocker.

[Enjoiskate]

In a forum discussing current political events, one of the most significant and disturbing political developments relevant to Americans in living memory frequently comes up. Shocker.

seems to be a hard concept to grasp

[Dextroden]

In a forum discussing current political events, one of the most significant and disturbing political developments relevant to Americans in living memory frequently comes up. Shocker.

But this thread isn't about discussing any current events. Just bashing people that voted for Trump.

[Elegiac]

But this thread isn't about discussing any current events. Just bashing people that voted for Trump.

Discussing why people hold unwavering belief in a figure that has shown to have no consistency and actually holds beliefs contradictory to their own is a highly current question, actually.

[Endus]

But this thread isn't about discussing any current events. Just bashing people that voted for Trump.

Asking Trump supporters to explain blind and unrelenting support for a candidate who weekly, if not daily, makes offensive statements or ludicrously incompetent political decisions isn't "bashing". The only way you could feel that way is if A> you yourself are that way, and B> you know you can't defend that attitude with reason and logic, and would rather just complain that people are asking you to do so.

Because if you did have reasonable explanations, you'd provide an answer, and it wouldn't be "bashing" to ask the question. And if you didn't feel that way, you'd see it as ridiculous as well.

It isn't "bashing" to point out ridiculous behaviour for being ridiculous. It's observational. And it isn't even about the left/right divide; this is a phenomenon that's cropped up just in the last few years. It wouldn't have applied to, say, the Bush years, where George W. may have been making decisions people felt were unethical (like the promotion of torture), but were at least not grossly incompetent or pointlessly and petulantly abusive.

Asking why someone is masturbating while covered in feces isn't "bashing" if they're actually masturbating while covered in feces. If they don't want people to see them as masturbating while covered in feces, maybe they should stop doing that, rather than whining about people who've noticed it.

[cubby]

No, any sane rational person would support him if he did that.

Which is why his fan base would dump him.