Originally Posted by
Skroe
This is uncharitable, and entirely not my point also. My point is that Americans fundamentally are getting what they want, and if they want something different, then they would send different people to do that.
I've written extensively here about what I think we should do with Healthcare in this country. It is pretty much "Emulate Japan" in many respect.
I also do not define "shitty overpriced healthcare" as an American value. I'm saying there is no American consensus that
(1) Healthcare is the most important thing, above other things
(2) We should have an American NHS
In about half the country, if they were their own country, we'd have an American NHS in about a week. In another half, running against "socialized Medicine" is a campaign winner. There is not a national consensus, even if there are regional or state ones (one way or another).
I liken this to gun control. Pretend you and me had a time machine and went back to 2002 and held a debate. "What would get Americans to finally take action on gun control". I would come up with some kind of extreme scenario about what it would take to get Americans out of their stupor on the subject: "You know, maybe if some maniac with a high powered rifle mowed down a bunch of kindergartners or something".
And then that happened at Sandy Hook And Americans were outraged for about two weeks and forgot about it. Even that extreme scenario didn't bring about change.
My feeling on Gun Control is America is that while half the country would want substantial reform, the other half has pretty much settled on the idea that, so long as it doesn't personally effect them, a double-digit body count massacre every few years is the opportunity cost of the 2nd Amendment. Sad, but "the price to be paid". Because seriously, if Sandy Hook won't bring about change... what will? Or hell, Las Vegas this year. Nothing, yet again. And even many gun owners were against that stock thing that enabled automatic fire.
Basically I'm not infantilizing the American people by saying that these calamities - bad healthcare and poor gun control - is something that HAPPENS to them, like it's an act of god or something. They are the end result of decisions, starting in the polling booth, that Americans make. If those issues became important enough to Americans, if they rose up high enough the priority queue in a sustainable fashion, then we would see rapid change on them. That has happened on other issues before. In the UK for example, touching the NHS is a political death wish. It is that high on British voter's priority list.
Democracy is not a spectator sport. The buck ultimately stops with the American people. Do socialized medicine, or don't. If the majority wins the argument and respects minority dissent, then that is fair. But the fact we don't have it in America right now speaks to Americans not having a national consensus on the subject, as much as many people talk a lot... a real lot... about the problems of healthcare here.
If there were a national consensus on what to do, and Americans actually sent politicians en masse to act on it to Washington, and not just liberal Senators and Representatives from blue states, then I'd be singing a different tune. Maybe we'll get there. But we aren't there yet. And meanwhile in ABSENCE Of that, other things that may not be as important in such a world have risen up the priority queue.