Last edited by Mistame; 2018-01-21 at 09:12 PM.
I disagree.
It's always funny to me that the people who hate this kind of stuff embrace the publicity and celebration of sexuality every where else. I frankly don't give a shit. If a type of marketing works, then it has merit. If it has merit, then it's not creepy and perverse, its just a successful method.
Dayum!!! Bootay!!! Humpday!!
How did he guess the names of my WoW characters?
Have to look at they contract they signed and see if their photos can be used. Nevertheless, how he did it wasn’t very professional.
Cheers
Last edited by Allybeboba; 2018-01-22 at 01:07 AM.
Try reading a few posts above yours. You do have rights in regards to it being published publicly or used for profit without your consent, but if you're in a public place, your rights are limited, as there's a limited expectation of privacy in public. You can go out on the street, etc, and film or take pictures and then upload them to youtube, etc, without the permission of anyone in them, as long as it's not done commercially or maliciously. On private property, you need the consent of the property owner.
Last edited by Mistame; 2018-01-22 at 02:56 AM.
Even in public there are limits. If you put a camera under a woman's skirt without her knowledge and take pictures, public place or no, you generally are going to get punished if you're caught.
In a professional setting, there are laws that state that consent is for specific usage. You absolutely can not ask people if they consent to being filmed for instructional purposes (IE: going over the footage with the person's trainer in order to point out relevant information) and then use it for advertising or for sexual gratification.
This seems like an outrage-culture about outrage-culture thing.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"