And why would that not be the case? History is replete with examples of cultures being overrun and destroyed by others. If suddenly 7 million Welshmen came to settle in Namibia would that not change Namibia irrevocably so?
- - - Updated - - -
If Germany wants an unlimited number of migrants they and they alone should have them.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
Merkel did not claim wir schaffen alles but wir schaffen das (sorry for my horrible german)
You do, i hope, understand the difference between eating this and eating all so lets make that the example. Merkal said she could eat that plate*, you claim she said she could eat all food in the world
*) Edit: Probably a better choice would be a rather large pot rather than a plate
Well there was a genocide perpetrated in Namibia, by white people of course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero...maqua_genocide
I wasn't aware the German chancellor could dictate the immigration policy of countries other than Germany.
- - - Updated - - -
Would the decision to resettle 7 million white British born people there not be seen as an attempt at ethnic cleansing? Indeed those 7 million Welshmen would constitute the majority of the country considering it only now has 2 million or so inhabitants. Would the current Namibians not be right to fear their country not being theirs anymore?
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
No, it wouldn't. Would some people view it that way? Sure, look at the 'white genocide' crowd in the US for example. But is it actually ethnic cleansing? Nope. Unless those white men are actively killing Namibians in this scenario, it's not ethnic cleansing. Being the minority is not ethnic cleansing. Which, incidentally, is a concept that the 'white genocide' crowd doesn't seem to understand.
Your last question is fair. But it's still just an attempt to move the goalposts. And I'm going to keep moving them back.
- - - Updated - - -
It's also worth noting that the Namibia hypothetical is completely incomparable to Europe. Seeing as the total immigrant population, including those who were already in Europe from before the migrant crisis, doesn't even remotely come close to being a majority in Europe. Much less triple it.
Also worth noting is that after the Germans left, the country was taken over apartheid South Africa who, true to form, started systematically appropriating all of the good land for white farmers while restricting the native population to bantustans. And yet, even after all of this, Namibia managed to survive with most of its cultural identity intact and is, by African standards at least, remarkably stable with a rapidly growing economy. So if a bunch of illiterate and destitute tribesmen can manage to survive centuries of colonization and exploitation and emerge from it stronger than ever, perhaps the Czech Republic won't be laid low with the influx of a few thousand refugees?
Last edited by Macaquerie; 2018-01-28 at 08:23 AM.