LOL..Are you for real? DO you think Republican hysteria will amoutn to nothing?
Read this:
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/trum...214800411.html
President Donald Trump has been talking to his friends about possibly asking Attorney General Jeff Sessions to prosecute Robert Mueller, NBC News reported.
Republicans are bending backward taking Trump as hard and as deep as they can and I promise you, this has greatly emboldened Trump.
Really? I can't? Being vice-chair of a committee that's the only committee investigating trump/russia that has been praised as behaving in a bipartisan manner. Again, just because you don't think that's something to approve of, just shows me you aren't paying attention.
And again, show how approving a warrant in the normal course of your duties causes a conflict of interest when using information garnered from that warrant. Stop deflecting. Or do you not have an answer?
That's not "action", that's just "remaining in Commitee he was in already" (as did Nunes, as far as i'm aware) and external praise.
I already explained my reasoning for possibility - self-referential "FISA warrant was lawful because i personally approved it".And again, show how approving a warrant in the normal course of your duties causes a conflict of interest when using information garnered from that warrant. Stop deflecting. Or do you not have an answer.
So chairing a committee isn't an action. You're essentially saying the committee isn't doing anything. Stop with your bullshit.
That's not an explanation. The FISA warrant was lawful because he approved investigators going to the judge and getting a warrant. Just because you are clueless, doesn't mean we are. Next time learn what we're talking about first before you make up bullshit.
You assume it's a witch hunt like you know for certain what went down. This is incredibly dishonest. Especially when we keep finding witches. You know that neither of us knows whether or not Trump is guilty of anything, but just about everyone around him is turning out to be a witch.
What we do know is that he has taken every effort to try and stop the investigation, not face it head on and defend himself IN COURT like an innocent person would. He's done everything to try and just make it NOT HAPPEN, which is not what innocent people do, and it's not how you prove your innocence in our court system.
Maybe you're confusing your Russian judicial system with ours; the common tactic there is to just make investigations and people you don't like "go away".
- - - Updated - - -
Thanks for proving my very point, that when you take a single instance of something out of context, from all of the other Russian connections, it sounds innocent enough... until you start putting all of the pieces together. But that's the only way you have to defend yourself, pretending this is some kind of isolated incident.
Last edited by Cthulhu 2020; 2018-01-31 at 02:40 PM.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Give example of his personal work in committee that would show his personal character.
Otherwise you can just as well say that since House Intelligence Committee did some work Nunes is upstanding citizen.
Being lawful doesn't mean there can be no potential conflict of interest. It would be lawful for Sessions to do investigation instead of Rosenstein too.That's not an explanation. The FISA warrant was lawful because he approved investigators going to the judge and getting a warrant.
- - - Updated - - -
I'm just saying that there would be no difference in reaction if he would be innocent.
I don't care one way or another if he is or isn't.
Every witch hunt did.Especially when we keep finding witches.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
There is enough history of Trump to see how he acts; there are no anomalies that can be used to say he is guilty or innocent.
Let me predict how it will end up - Trump will respond to Mueller questions, Mueller will say "no charges, nothing to see there", probe wraps up (possibly somewhere after they fail to convict Manafort).
Except we have a concrete example of nunes not being an upstanding citizen.
It wouldn't be ethical for sessions to do the investigation. Because he's a possible target of that investigation. Like I said, stop with the bullshit. So again, come up with an actual conflict of interest. Instead of just making bullshit up whole-cloth.
You haven't produced any examples of Warren being upstanding citizen, however. "I don't know about anything questionable with his involvement" isn't proof of him being upstanding citizen.
Exactly; and just as much there can be ethical questions for Rosenstein to continue sensitive investigation on PotUS due to surveillance upon Trump he previously approved himself. Not legal questions - both Rosenstein and Session could legally do that.It wouldn't be ethical for sessions to do the investigation. Because he's a possible target of that investigation. Like I said, stop with the bullshit. So again, come up with an actual conflict of interest. Instead of just making bullshit up whole-cloth.
- - - Updated - - -
Omissions; whatever is included is said by FBI to be accurate. Just possibly misleading without extra information (which will hopefully be provided by interested parties to not look that bad).