Originally Posted by
Sonol
Well, after reading the article, you can name it whatever you want, it's still based on speculation, a chain of transactions and investment. Many ppl use it as investment regardless. They expect that their money will worth more over time, by the increasing price of one bitcoin. And this process baits even more new ppl to the game, they also invest money (buy and hold the coins), and wait for it to worth even more.
It's almost like stock exchange, except the entire article says nothing about the backing of bitcoin. What makes it sure, that invested money won't lose it's value at some point as bitcoin? It sounds appealing, that all bitcoin trasactions can be reviewed and followed, but it's not a backing, it's just trasparency.
And this is the biggest lie of all. Even the article admits that there is still a small minority that holds their coins, meaning they used it from the start (by investing and speculating, and being lucky after all) to become rich. Yet you and the article try to convince me that it's not a pyramid scheme. It is. It's based on new entries, how much they invest and how they influence the price (by selling them after a while, or buying even more - expecting even more profit over time).
And the last sentence: "They measure their net worth in the amount of Bitcoins they hold, not in its fiat value." It's so cute. But what makes it valuable? A bag of napkins can be also valuable, if I can exchange them into food or other goods, products, a real estate (which we call cash basically). But it still needs a backing, a trust that if I take 3 napkins for my used car, then adding 2 more, I can buy a better one for 5 napkins, because car seller is willing to accept my napkins for the car.
What happens when a government sets up the regualtions, laws and say, that you can't pay with crypto (napkin) anymore?
Currently it's value only comes from trade deals, speculations and relying on new investments. It's like making money out of thin air.