Because he haven't seen it, duh, so he cannot claim one way or another.
His memo is as accurate as Republican notes on those FISA applications from which it was compiled.
- - - Updated - - -
I didn't claim that it didn't, sorry. I just said that putting that information in footnote can be suspicious.
Can. Depending on overall context.
You're saying that "putting anything in footnote instead of main text" cannot ever be suspicious, under any circumstance? Really? "Suspicious", not even "criminal" or "proof of anything".
You're dishonest one here.Your own counter-argument here demonstrates the dishonesty inherent in your original argument. Good job.