Jesus Christ...... Instead of jumping to stupid conclusions; why don't you read the damn article on the site I linked. You'd realize there was a redirect link to kiro news regarding this story.
Here you go - http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/pros...-sex/693463851
Last edited by SLSAMG; 2018-02-09 at 03:31 PM.
This is an issue very close to me. My high school girlfriend's parents found out we were having sex. She was 17 and I was 19. I'd probably be a registered sex offender right now, for totally consensual sex with someone a similar age, and maturity, to myself. EXCEPT that the age of consent where I live is 16... So I got the exact punishment I deserved: None.
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."
First, call me extremely suspect that he was not aware of her age.
Second, what is ''male hating'' in saying that he just had to pick one that was bit older ? I know MRA have a religious obligation to say girls above 18 are ''ugly and fat'', but he would not be in such a situation if had indulged in his urges with women 24 months older.
OK, so you made me get the Google definition of 'child'. The top definition is, and I quote: "a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority."
So while your definition (below the age of majority) is valid, is it not the only valid way of looking at it. "below the age of puberty" is listed, as well.
That's convenient because he is charged with sex with a MINOR not a ''child''.
thats nice, save it for when you are debating these evil MRA folks then, because you sound like an idiot talking about them and what they think when they aren't in this conversation. But i see you already convicted him and would burn him at the stake if it was up to you, good thing he hasn't even been charged with a crime per the article...wouldnt want that to stop you in your crusade against men.
Edit: ok the 2nd article seems to list what he was charged with, and if the conversations outside of the dating program are true then there is reasonable doubt brought into question on if he knew or suspected her age (also with the way it's worded she might have been 15 at the time of the event), still my overall view on this is he got played.
Last edited by Saucexorzski; 2018-02-09 at 03:58 PM.
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."
A "child" does not willing signup for a website / app to become agold diggerprostitute.
Fuck off with that shit.
The OP wording is dishonest, since he is charged with having sex with a minor, not a ''child''. A minor have a very straightfoward definition.
The entire thing is not really hard to understand, IMO. In most juridictions of the USA, it's tolerated to have sex with adult prostitutes (unless the D.A is trying to look tough for some reasons) but illegal to have sex with minor ones, not to mention far less socially acceptable outside MRA sites.
Considering moreover that minors involved in the sex trade have a much higher chance than adults of doing it under coercition, WHY pick a 16 years old escort instead of a 20 years old one ?
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."