I'm half tempted to report you for nation bashing.
I'm half tempted to report you for nation bashing.
That's not even counting the "social services" we fund with our taxes. That is charity as well and is well into the billions. Besides the charity built into the tax code, most people I know (even those not well off) give to at least one or two other charities.
We might be the only country in the world that is borrowing trillions from China, then giving billions of it away........ We might want to examine that and think about that a little more closely......
except that the ranking is based on percentage of GDP which has a normalizing effect on the data i.e. someone giving $1000 on a GDP of $10000 would be the same as someone giving $100 on a GDP of $1000
- - - Updated - - -
Look up Catholic Charities. Not sure what you think it’s being wasted on but it’s not the church.
USA has the most billionaires in the world.. not surprising at all. Remove donations from billionaires and the results would be way different.
While there is still a lot of problems (like why the hell donating to a religious institution is considered a charity), But yeah, America does donate the most to charity, and i am not bashing the US but the study. America has the richest economy in the western world if we look at it overall. But again, what is a charity? Something like Children hospitals is something a lot is donated to in the US, and it is a great course, but in other countries that does not even exist as an option, as the healthcare facilities are already in place through taxes. Same with a lot of education. Why I say the study is flawed. A better study would be to compare how much is donated to solely, for example, cancer prevention and research, something that the US would most likely still rank top in, but at least it would be comparable.
Poor, poor people who dont know what is behind those donations.
Last edited by mmoc602e930669; 2018-02-11 at 02:15 PM. Reason: grammar
'Charity is a cold grey loveless thing. If a rich man wants to help the poor, he should pay his taxes gladly, not dole out money at a whim.'
Habitat for Humanity?
Salvation Army?
YMCA?
Upwards of 20% of the hospitals in the US are non-profits operated by the Catholic Church?
You don't consider these things charity?
And that's all I can think of off the top of my head, I am not religious and don't donate to religious organizations so I am ignorant of the others.
Yeah, I just checked partially the report.
Sure in sheer number US outweight everybody, but it is also quite previsible that a large country with a wealthy population is scored high in the ranking.
However it is not what the report shows.
Firstly, the authors use their own index to score countries (disregarding the gap in wealth and population) and the US is in 5th position, and it's great for the US. Especially for a country that large, I have no doubt that the US population is indeed one of the most charitable according to its level of wealth. However the report show something else. US goes below the top 10 when its come to the percentage of people giving their time or money which show that their is a "smaller but more generous" population giving to charity.
Finally, every country tends to give less and less over the last 5 years, despite a more positive economy and the US has lost ranking over the year (from #2 to #5). Maybe it was because US had during the last 5 years some reason to give to charity (like hurricane...) or it's a more concerning trend. Don't misunderstand me, I don't blame the US for being less charitable, the US will still give more than my country (and my personnal participation is not great). However I found weird that "US has gone less charitable over the last 5 years and even went down in the scoring" became "US is most generous baby !!!!" which is a clear manipulation of information (by the article).
According to the current stats - the USA is the 21st most generous nation in the world at 0.15% of GDP.
Challenge Mode : Play WoW like my disability has me play:
You will need two people, Brian MUST use the mouse for movement/looking and John MUST use the keyboard for casting, attacking, healing etc.
Briand and John share the same goal, same intentions - but they can't talk to each other, however they can react to each other's in game activities.
Now see how far Brian and John get in WoW.
Why are you quoting from this list?
That isn't even a charity, that's government aid to developing countries?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...country_donors
Challenge Mode : Play WoW like my disability has me play:
You will need two people, Brian MUST use the mouse for movement/looking and John MUST use the keyboard for casting, attacking, healing etc.
Briand and John share the same goal, same intentions - but they can't talk to each other, however they can react to each other's in game activities.
Now see how far Brian and John get in WoW.
That might be true if taxes went to the absolute poor. A billionaire like Bill Gates does much more for the absolute poor in the third world through his charitable donations than his taxes which go to the relative poor in the U.S. who already live better than the vast majority of the rest of the world. (The vast majority of taxpayer does not go to help the poor. Much more of it goes to groups like the elderly).
I wonder if they take things like the "church tax" into consideration too.....
Last edited by mmoc96d9238e4b; 2018-02-11 at 03:57 PM.
The real question is, does it count Donations to Political parties, then it would be moot.
We can also say, America attacked most countries in last 200 years than any other, killed milions, made trillions dollars in damage and in return made trillions in profit?
Now let's change the numbers to be more in proportion to a country's GDP, for example, to see who's truly generous...
It's like Americans bragging they got the most medals when they had almost 700 members in the Olympics.