Your example doesn't work as the reason he's fat isn't because he's getting assistance, but because he has no self control. He has a lot of other issues that aren't buying junk food.
I won't disagree that food should be used on more personally responsible food items, but cutting out soda and candy bars isn't going to stop your friend, as an example. Some juices are just as bad as soda and you could easily find ways of buying something as bad as candy bars. At that point we'd be talking about coming up with a rule for a case by base basis and then some companies will make new products that get around those for even more time to be spent trying to block people from buying it.
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
Wow, I'm stunned to see a post from Ransath I can at least agree with here...
Juice is just as bad as soda because of the high sugar content but he has a terrible diet, he mostly eats chips and drinks soda.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, won't stop people from selling their food stamps 50 cents on the dollar but it does solve half the problem.
So full of shit its not even funny
Even at max 194 a month or 6.47 dollars a day or 2.16 a meal......your "friend" somehow found the ability to gain 400 lbs.??
There is not enough junk food you can buy each month for 194 dollars that can make you gain 400lbs.
So is this intended to be like WIC where there is just a pre-approved list of items you can get every month or do they intend on a whole division of people to create, distribute, and catalog these care packages (from the articles I have seen it seems to be the latter)? And how does this all work with the nature of food stamps? For instance, WIC is easy, as there is just a list. If you qualify for WIC, you get what's on the list each month.
Food stamps however can wildly vary from family to family. It's easy if you set up a baseline of what a family getting $X per month should get, but what about people who get half/a quarter as much? What do you cut out? Who creates the regulations on what gets cut out first? Care packages from churches or outreach typically do not contain perishable items like fresh produce. How does this program anticipate handling this?
It also sounds like there would need to be local food distribution centers to handle this. I see articles telling me how they are going to save all this money, but no actual information on how that is going to work, especially with all the extra manpower and potential facilities needed.
If someone were to tell me that food stamps can be improved to make sure people are getting healthy food choices at a better savings to the tax payer, I would certainly listen and hope they are on to something but this seems to be the most ass-backwards way of making improvements.
I know this isn't related, but do you honestly not see anything unhealthy with this statement? I know I shouldn't treat anything you say as truth and fact, because "hey it's the internet" and you are pretty much a space cadet, but c'mon...
Won't stop people from selling the stupid Trump Box that comes everyday to deliver 6 dollars worth of food....that will cost 9 dollars to deliver. We will end up spending more on the logistics of this program then we currently spend on the whole program today.
Food distribution is expensive.
Since its the government shipping them, they can be sent for free through USPS. Just like any other federal mail. Also while yes there is a lot of sodium in canned meat, there is none in canned vegetables, nor boxed pasta (unless youre looking at complete meals like boxed mac and cheese), bags of dried beans, canned fruit, and many other shelf stable things
You should really take a look at some data points on the subject and see exactly how WELL the program works. If you're expecting perfect functionality with a program well, I guess this is your first time around the block.
SNAP works as well as it can. Trump is in la-la land if he thinks his changes are any kind of improvement.