... oh... oh damn....
So we know Saurfang's capture is AFTER Teldrassil and Lordaeron. What if he's staying in Stormwind because he does want to talk to Anduin about what REALLY happened?
Not just whether or not the Horde is responsible for the burning of Teldrassil, but the actual MOTIVATION for Teldrassil and the whole "Sylvanas wants peace but the only peace she thinks we can get is to be on separate sides of the planet" thing... How would -that- shit play out? There's people who think he's going to lapdog to Anduin, but the dude's so die-hard-horde I can barely fathom that possibility.
What if that's his actual intent, and Anduin, offering his next lie, hides the truth willfully because he doesn't believe peace is possible, anymore? What if he throws Saurfang into prison, or worse: Frames him for attempted assassination and flatly kills the aged orc?
... that would make for one HELL of a story.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
Sylvanas coup is just being built up early on instead of a mid expansion patch. Between the Desolate Council and Saurfang there will clearly be friction in the Horde this expansion. I don't think Sylvanas will be a raid boss but definitely an antagonist and Nathanos may be being set up as her replacement for Forsaken figurehead.
Lots of characters get unique models that are just loot piñatas. Like that boss at the end of Freehold.
Actually, Sylvanas was very special to Arthas. Her persistence vexed him, so he made sure to give her a "special" treatment.
Maybe the writers at the time didn't put much thought into it, it's certainly not supposed to be "deep", but you also can't deny that it can be interpreted in the way Steampunkette did, and this is far from the first time I've heard this theory, by the way (to counter the argumentum ad populum)
Yes, zombies and control of the dead are often a metaphor for slavery, but just like rape, that's a very perverse way of forcing your will unto others.
Metaphors are fluid, open to interpretation, maybe beyond what the writer even thought of.
You could just argue that it's more about slavery, but somehow, many here express it in a way that implies "you're crazy for even suggesting it's about rape instead"
"victim later becomes offender" has certainly never happened before, right?
And just because not every victim of the Scourge is portrayed this way doesn't mean Sylvanas, a prominent character even before TFT, can't receive a special treatment. Slavery and rape often worked hand in hand.
Last edited by Nathanyel; 2018-02-14 at 04:59 PM.
But your duty to Azeroth is not yet complete. More is demanded of you... a price the living cannot pay.
Sure do!
And sometimes they say stuff pretty blatantly to try and trick you into not noticing. Like Alleria's banishment from Silvermoon as her "Third Death" that opens the door, with Nether Prince Durzaan flatly stating that the door has been opened! People still think it'll be Sylvanas's third death since becoming undead.
Last edited by Steampunkette; 2018-02-14 at 04:46 PM.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
You're 100% right, and I'd agree with you if Nathano's hadn't gotten TWO updates: one from the regular undead hunter trainer, to both a story and model update that ties him to being a ranger connected to Sylvanas and made him "special" compared to other undead, and then ANOTHER update that made him even more unique looking.
The second update even made him less "Sylvanas" looking: if you didn't know the character he looks like some evil hunter guy, not a dark ranger. Nathanos got this sudden surge into the spotlight as a "forsaken champion" when he was prior just a popular niche character and the focus on him as been more than you would get for other champions like Malkorok, Nazgrim, Taylor, etc. Nobody else got such an update in story role and model. Either he's a raid boss, or he's going to act as some kind of replacement for Sylvanas: people have been complaining that the undead human faction is lead by an elf for a long time now.
Hell, isn't "mindrape" the popular term for heavily invasive and horrific mind control? Or has that changed? From what I recall, that kind of shit's been compared to rape for a long time. If that means all the former Scourge were metaphorically raped, then so be it. In a way, you could say they were violated on a far deeper level than actual rape, though some people might take offense to that because we don't have many real life Necromancers enslaving the dead.
Look I understand but Vol'Jin went out horribly, he deserved better. He was a WCIII character and got shafted in Legion. I'm no Horde fanatic or anything like that but guy needed more screentime.
Obviously it has, it's obvious Sylvanas became the very thing she hated Arthas for in the first place. That said, I don't need to read into being raised into Undeath as some allegory for rape."victim later becomes offender" has certainly never happened before, right?
#TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde
Warrior-Magi
Not everyone gets what they deserve. It's entirely realistic that someone might become a world leader only to die almost instantly, especially in a war setting where they lead from the front because morale.
It became clear that it wasn’t realistic to try to get the audience back to being more hardcore, as it had been in the past. -- Tom Chilton