Sorry, but unless you're able to support this crap with any evidence, it's utterly worthless as a call out, or even a post. Well, unless you see value in exposing yourself as an extremely delicate genius that can't handle poor innocent Alliance being called out on its shit, so you randomly fling shit hoping that the act of flinging shit itself will give you validity, which is what posts like this look like if you're unwilling to provide examples. You know, to actually call me out. In which case, you do you. The part in bold is particularly lulzworthy, because I address every point made that I disagree with and explain my position as to why I disagree with. Which robs you of any credibility even further.
Hell, you couldn't possibly quote a worse post of mine in this thread to make your grand "point", since it's not even about actual lore, but logic and argumentation. So all your unsubstantiated flailing about me needing to "learn my lore" or being a fanboy isn't really relevant here.
And to expose your lies for what they are even more, here's a challenge for you. In time leading to the eruption of faction conflict in Cata, do try to find an attack by either side earlier than the one described here: https://wow.gamepedia.com/Kilrok_Gorehammer#Quotes Why this event? Why not, you said I twist every word I post in lore, so my portrayal of events leading to Cata is just as "false" as everything else. Weirdly enough, despite this supposed flaw of my posts no brilliant Alliance mind that was shit-flinging in my direction actually could provide an example. I'm sure a lore giant like you will fare much better though.
And? How is this supposed to be a counter-argument to what you quoted? You just repeated the fact that Sylvanas planned aggression. Which, once again (and as said even by an Alliance poster I quoted) is no true aggression. A true aggression is Alliance attack in Silithus. Which happens before Teldrassil.
Logging camps aren't really annexed territory.
Except those "civilians" in Azurelode and Hillsbrad are targeted for being members of anti-Forsaken militia. It's unknown who started hostilities in Hillsbrad, by the time quests start the conflict is already ongoing.
Stromgarde isn't an Alliance member ever since the aftermath of the Second War. Stromgarde defenders enlisting help from Alliance after the conflict started (with it also being unknown who struck the first blow) isn't Horde attacking the Alliance.
Your own quest shows they attacked only the High Elves. Those High Elves joined the Alliance only in Cata.
Prisoners like non-Alliance Scarlet Crusaders.
Aside from Ashenvale all you've got is events where it's unknown who started the hostilities yet you claim it to be Horde's aggression based on nothing or events involving non-Alliance forces. And Ashenvale is outweigh by Alliance doing the same kinds of incursions in Horde territory of Mulgore, the Barrens and Alterac Valley (with the difference being that the point of the incursion is archaeological digs rather than lumber). And Kirin Tor holding Forsaken prisoner in Alterac. And Kirin Tor starting things in Ambermill in Silverpine Forest.
As for Alliance attacking the Barrens before the invasion of Ashenvale, https://wow.gamepedia.com/Kilrok_Gorehammer#Quotes Before Cataclysm. Garrosh invaded Ashenvale only after (and because of) the Cataclysm.
I learned from them that Sylvanas enslaving Eyir would enslave all Val'kyr, because not only were those magical chains a curse, but also that curses apparently work that way in WoW.
A claim still only said by the straw-men you constructed in your mind because you can't deal with arguments that offend your feeble sensibilities.
-Gnomeregan
-A weapon that kills everyone, oh noes. I'll take "What's the point of weapons for $200, Alex". Also, only the accidental strain of Blight at Southshore has been said to make the land uninhabitable. Also, Blight isn't a plague. And speaking of making the land uninhabitable, also Gnomeregan.
-MoP.
-Tides of War.
-You still failing to grasp 6 years later that Sylvanas was shit-talking Garrosh to annoy him is something that you should look into, not an argument. Even Garrosh was able to realize it for what it is. In one second.
Which still isn't a justification. Besides, the Alliance doesn't have proof the Horde is even making weapons for sure, let alone that they intend to use them against the Alliance, before they start to blow shit up.
Cult of the Damned is alive, for once. They are also mind-slaves of the Lich King, which is kinda the opposite of the whole point of the Forsaken. Scourge in general also wants to wipe out all life and turn it into mind-slaves too. You're not looking very close.
Today I learned that going to an outpost that does not belong to you or your faction and blowing shit up because you don't like what the people there are doing, with the intent to deliberately hurt their operation no less, does not constitute an attack if you don't kill anyone. Fascinating bit of information.
The archaeologist expedition was already an incursion into Horde territory. Stormpikes themselves admitted that. In their first quest. Dwarves did the same thing in Mulgore and the Barrens.
Except that's not true at all. Jaina goes to Orgrimmar immediately after Wrathgate to learn what happened (back when Alliance had enough collective brain-power to ask for clarification first rather than using their fucked up perception of things to attack the Horde like they did in Stormheim). She learns from Thrall and Sylvanas of the coup in Undercity and the rebels being responsible for Wrathgate. She conveys that information to Varian.
This very knowledge is the reason Varian went to Undercity. He knew it was a good moment to strike. Not only to punish the rebels for the Wrathgate, but to steal the city from the Horde while they temporarily were not in control of it.
The fighting in Wolfheart takes place after Cataclysm. Alliance invasion of Barrens happened before Cataclysm. The war in Cata was only a continuation of the war declared by Varian in Undercity anyway, since The Shattering says the factions only had a truce after WotLK.
The same war as in WotLK and Cata.
Sylvanas wanting to steal the power of "v" is no justification for an attack. And events of the Broken Shore is them retreating because it was necessary.
If you ignore all of the times above, sure. I mean, even your inaccurate portrayal of Undercity shows the Alliance attacking first, just using incorrect information as a justification, so #consistence.