glad you got the reference
- - - Updated - - -
yes it makes more sense that she will be peacefully deposed. Like...you dont have to kill your leaders in order to take em out of power
Sylvannas is SMART. she says in that prologue that Garrosh had some good ideas but he was completely careless about it. that she'd be more subtle. you know like giving propoganda that alliance are aggressors and hate the horde no matter what and wont stop till they are dead, and give propoganda like Shes committing attrocities in order to protect the horde...so anyone who doesnt like her Melting people is...anti horde and whats horde children to die.
Sylvannas is a GREAT character whos depicted as smart and conniving . and its great they've done such a good job of making her likable that real life people actually buy into her propaganda
anyways point is shes SMART. if she realizes that the horde is standing its ground and isnt going to let her lead then she will step down. she's not dumb enough to start blatantly executing her own army and turning them into an enemy.
she's ALOT smarter than garrosh and isnt going to do the same thing he did
Romance doesnt detract from a story. Its a Genre, like horror or comedy or adventure. The game was ruined when we got Horror in drustvar or nazmir. It wasnt ruined when we had funny quests. So if you think a little man on man love ruins the game, then yes you are either a homophobe or just a spoil sport that goes "ewww kissing is yucky" like a baby. Furthermore, if a character has never expressed interest in any gender, then its not proof they are straight. straight people are not the default
Okay so...
For the past several months we've discussed various potential plots about BAz and most of us have kind of settled in on "Old Gods hiding badly behind HvA plot" while others think it's gonna be MoP2 with Sylvanas going full Hitler and Garroshing it up before getting killed.
We also know that Azshara is going to be a boss in one of the raids before the end of the expansion, and that she's also working with some of the peoples of Kul'tiras and Zandalar to work against the island nations as well as against each of them.
But what if we're all wrong?
What if this expansion is actually going to be focused on Queen Azshara, herself, rather than N'zoth or other Old Gods? What if her initial machinations are a key component of a larger plan that we haven't yet learned about?
I'd like to propose this theory:
Stage 1: Azshara makes contact with Kul'Tiras through the Sea Priests serving N'zoth, her benefactor. Using their influence, she begins manipulating the Houses to divide them, causing chaos and disorder in the Island Nation.
Stage 2: Working with some of the factions of Zandalar, she pushes forward to a civil war within the nation to destabilize it.
Stage 3: When Sylvanas seeks to capture Teldrassil, in order to cut the Alliance out of Kalimdor, Azshara burns it to the ground, knowing that the Alliance will blame the Horde and brook no further discussion of peace, instead moving to all out war.
Stage 4: With the two factions of Azeroth's heroes on opposite sides of the sea, each turns to their nearest and most reasonable sea-faring nation for aid in the coming war.
Stage 5: Both Horde and Alliance exhaust resources and time trying to quell the unrest of the Island Nations while also going to a costly, bloody war, weakening each and distracting them from Azshara's true intent.
Stage 6: Azshara tries to release N'zoth fully, while the Alliance and Horde are busy dealing with G'huun.
We turn against Azshara in 8.1, but instead of KILLING her, we either defeat her, temporarily, and force her to retreat, or GASP! We fail, and have to retreat because she succeeds at stirring N'zoth.
We deal with N'Zoth in 8.2 and she steals some measure of his power to empower herself for 8.3, making the whole expansion Azshara-Centric for the main villain, but hiding her behind HvA in the art and marketing while also misleading the playerbase into thinking we'll roflstomp her early on...
It would be pretty cool. Or I think so, at least.
When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like injustice.
They never said which patch we'd be fighting Azshara in. Just because she's not the last boss doesn't mean she won't be influential. I mean, Argus was a nobody in Legion. Gul'dan and Kil'jaedan were the more relevant to the plot. Azshara doesn't need to be the absolute final boss to be a big deal.
Ion did actually, after showing the first raid bosses he says "...now this is the first raid, this is the highmaul, the emerald nightmare of this expansion. Now following this [...] we will be facing off against queen Azshara"
[/URL]
I think it's time Rokhan got a new model and looked different compared to others since well I him to lead the Darkspear Tribe;
For the Horde!
no, dont write the links....
Reddit Thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/WC3/comment..._the_usa_soon/
thread which is mention in reddit http://www.readmore.de/forums/90-esp...ent-in-den-usa
(in german) which states that its mostly a SMARTPHONE GAME and NOT wc3 remastered...
I wouldn't mind it. Done right, it's a good story.
Only thing that bothers me is Azshara burning Teldrassil. It would require her to have inside info on the Sylvana's plans.
So, I think making the war a natural thing, and Azshara seizing opportunity to influence both sides, rather being the motivator, more likely.
Whatever...
we are just in a confusion of what kind of "care" she have upon the horde
she "cares" about the horde like vol'jin and thrall did, with altruism, for real? without lying to some peasants so they follow her?
or she cares about the horde in the sense the horde is her meatshield? cause without the power of the horde to defend her, she will die and she fear death most of all?
I doubt it is the first. maybe people gonna say "the reason don't matter, the means don't matter, just the end" i still dessagre
People acting like Sylvanas doesn't really care about the Horde based on stuff from Cata with disregarding any following characterization are silly