Mega-Thread: Mueller investigation

[Breccia]

What do you mean by this? Your ilks typical response, critique = russian.

Looks like you @Missed the context. Again.

You posted something from the Russian foreign ministry.

Someone else posted basically the same thing, in very similar terms.

So, I called them a Russian troll. You should probably start paying attention to the context of matters. That's two big WHOOSHes over your head in five minutes.

[apeiron1234]

You said:

"After learning about this shocking revelation today I am happy that no American was purposely trying to sabotage our elections."

What he said doesn't really back up your claims.

Sometimes I get things mixed up as I am not perfect. When I first heard about it, it was over the radio on my drive home. I'm such a butterfingers sometimes!

[Deleted]

Looks like you @Missed the context. Again.

You posted something from the Russian foreign ministry.

Someone else posted basically the same thing, in very similar terms.

So, I called them a Russian troll. You should probably start paying attention to the context of matters. That's two big WHOOSHes over your head in five minutes.

sorry my bad i already ignored that guy just saw the bottom quote. didnt make sense

[Breccia]

been called a russian twice by breccia

Nope. Your inability to read context does not reflect poorly on me.

[ati87]

Then why is the Russians trying to use propaganda a problem? Is it because they hope to influence people voting decision so that they can RIG and election in their favor? If they are not trying to RIG and election why is there a problem?

I know it's hard for you to understand given your memory problems.

Hacking is a illegal act you know in the US, even if it's evil clinton
Being influenced by a 3e party in exchange for a illegal service is also illegal even in the US

I know weird why the US would have laws against hacking and why the US wouldn't politicians being influenced by other parties given the corruption with the right-wing.

You are still using the word rig wrong though but you can be forgiven if you just stopped hitting your head against a wall and get some fresh air.

[cubby]

I find it adorable that you cannot discern the difference between Russians being indicted today but not one AMERICAN.

You now, you and your ilk have been saying "that time is "almost" at an end" for almost a year.

"Almost", eh? LOL!!

We have - and yet somehow you continue to miss the parts where we also say it may take another year or more to indict/impeach Trump. But you know what hasn't stopped? More indictments.

[Machismo]

Sometimes I get things mixed up as I am not perfect. When I first heard about it, it was over the radio on my drive home. I'm such a butterfingers sometimes!

So, does that mean you are retracting your claim?

[Deleted]

What do you mean by this? Your ilks typical response, critique = russian.

What do you expect? They have nothing else, aside from sarcasm.

As the saying goes, sarcasm is the lowest form of wit - so next time, consider the source of the sarcasm.

[NYC17]

I find it adorable that you cannot discern the difference between Russians being indicted today but not one AMERICAN.

You now, you and your ilk have been saying "that time is "almost" at an end" for almost a year.

"Almost", eh? LOL!!

That's something you have claimed others are claiming. Most people on these forums have been saying that this takes time, some even expressing annoyance with how long these investigations take. What you state isn't even a strawman; it's a manifestation of the argument taking place only in your mind.

[apeiron1234]

So, does that mean you are retracting your claim?

If it makes you happy and eases your mind then I will retract it.

[Moralgy]

That was unfortunate.

Whale, that is a funny post rofl.

[Deleted]

Ill say again wire fraud is wire fraud but the rest is speech. I hope a high standard is in place for proving that election posts = “Defrauding the US”.

[Deleted]

We have - and yet somehow you continue to miss the parts where we also say it may take another year or more to indict/impeach Trump.

"Almost" only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

The only reason YOU say "it may take another year or more to indict/impeach Trump." is because that is what SKROE says.

[Felya]

been called a russian twice by breccia and cubby for offering dissent. from sarf London m8. Or have I read this wrong and he was calling missed a russian bot?

I am pointing out the typical part of what you said.

[Machismo]

If it makes you happy and eases your mind then I will retract it.

It's not so much about easing my mind, as it is about you not wanting to spread misinformation and lies. If you are fine with doing such things, then don't retract it.

[Breccia]

Just throwing this out there for context:



Trump has a decision to make:
a) stay true to his campaign platform of being Russia's friend, especially in the context of charges placed against actual Russian agents being indicted, and the law he signed involving sanctions for such, by pursuing neither of those, or
b) going back on his word, putting the actual force of law into both these indictments and also the sanctions he signed, at the risk of going against a country that clearly supported him -- with or without collusion -- and who both the US intelligence community and every single member of the House Intelligence Committee agree Russia has not only done before, but do again. Just against him this time.

Even with no collusion, this is not a great place to be. Act against a clearly armed, experienced, capable foe...or admit he was wrong.

[Bullettime]

Ill say again wire fraud is wire fraud but the rest is speech. I hope a high standard is in place for proving that election posts = “Defrauding the US”.

Eh. Using laundered money and fake identities to purchase influence on the US election through social media on behalf of a foreign country's interests.

[NYC17]

"Almost" only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

The only reason YOU say "it may take another year or more to indict/impeach Trump." is because that is what SKROE says.

Or because it took a year or more to bring about these indictments.

This is empirical proof of that. It's also empirical proof that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

[Breccia]

Ill say again wire fraud is wire fraud but the rest is speech.

Nope.

Foreign powers, especially foreign ones, can't contribute to an election. That includes paid advertisements and organizing rallies. Which are on the indictments, multiple times.

EDIT: And as @Bullettime so accurately pointed out, if it was just speech -- why steal identities? Why the wire fraud? If there's nothing wrong with free speech, why were they hiding behind fake American accounts?

It's like asking "why obstruct justice if you're not guilty"?

[Machismo]

Or because it took a year or more to bring about these indictments.

This is empirical proof of that. It's also empirical proof that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Let's not forget, this is a guy who just bragged that he has held a top secret clearance for 18 years, so if he's to be believed, that means that he's a government welfare case. I guess when all those calls to drain the swamp were coming out... he didn't mean himself.