Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemposs View Post
    Seeing how high the age is for the average person before they move out these days, we'd need to let people vote at like 25.

    Also, we're talking about 16 year olds, thinking that they'll do what you tell them to is naive at best
    Teenagers got sheep behaviour, if it's not influenced by their parents it'd be amongst their stupid peers, or a teacher, or whatever.

    i.e. Teens are stupid in the sense they are easily influenced, no matter how ill-informed it may be they'd treat it like Gospel.
    Last edited by Daedius; 2018-02-16 at 08:51 PM.

  2. #22
    I am Murloc!
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Baden-Wuerttemberg
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Daedius View Post
    That's too young, and can be easily abused with coercion... a lot of teens have zero interests in politics. Ought to be raised to 21 where they are, hopefully, independent then.
    you cannot raise it to 21, when 18 is already set as adult age.

  3. #23
    The Undying Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    39,997
    I say the US actually has this one right: if you can be drafted, you can vote.

    I think that's seventeen. But I'm an American and have been indoctrinated to be poor at other countries, so my bad if that's wrong.

  4. #24
    If the Gov think your old enough to fuck and start a family at 16 then you're old enough to vote.

  5. #25
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Daedius View Post
    Teenagers got sheep behaviour, if it's not influenced by their parents it'd be amongst their stupid peers, or a teacher, or whatever.

    i.e. Teens are stupid in the sense they are easily influenced, no matter how ill-informed it may be.
    As opposed to us adult, who vote purely from isolated self critical thoughts?

    Also, I will note that if you actually engaged them in voting, in their school years, you'd actually have a possibility of explaining all these negatives and influences, instead of waiting for two years to go by and hope that they remembered all those things.

  6. #26
    If you give kids the opportunity you'd be surprised at how eager they are to rise to the occasion and feel like they have some semblance of power. It gives them a reason to actually care about politics rather than be apathetic towards it. During the IndyRef 16 year olds were allowed to vote and they took the responsibility pretty seriously. Engaged well, informed themselves. There was a debate on the BBC which showcased it but I can't find a non-bbc link so...

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Trassk View Post
    Pretty much this.

    If your to young to be a reasonable parent, guardian or teacher, then you shouldn't yet be allowed to make important decisions on the political direction of the country
    That is pretty well put, Trassk.

    I am not sure why Conservatives would ever support this. Younger voters usually swing to the left.
    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.

  8. #28
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by ranzino View Post
    you cannot raise it to 21, when 18 is already set as adult age.
    You can. Just make a law like the one trying to get it put at 16 but instead write 21 or 25 instead.

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffyman View Post
    You can. Just make a law like the one trying to get it put at 16 but instead write 21 or 25 instead.
    Why would you want to though? If I was in the military, willing to die to defend my country, I would sure as hell like to be given the ability to determine how it runs.

  10. #30
    16 is old enough to enlist, consent and get married in the UK.

    Denying the right to vote while also saying you have the right to start a family is farcical.

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Taftvalue View Post
    Children shouldn't be allowed to vote.
    "Children" can drive legally without supervision at the age of 16, I don't really see a problem with voting. They have the same access to information we do.

  12. #32
    By 18 plenty of "children" are independant; denying a vote to them until this point but expecting them somehow to feel they have a stake in society is a bit backwards, no?

    At least by voting at 16 you can tell them "Now you're vested in the future, go make something of it".

    I'm not saying that "this means it's a good idea" just that not sides to it are bad (and fuck the idea of paying taxes and not getting to vote until you're 21). I personally didn't get to vote until I was 21 years old, the previous general election falling some few months before my 18th. Raising it to 21 means some people won't get to vote until they are almost 25. Even by lowering it to 16, it won't affect half the population (they'd have been over 18 in time for a general election anyway).
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Posting here is primarily a way to strengthen your own viewpoint against common counter-arguments.

  13. #33
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Frolk View Post
    99% of 16 year olds are NOT knowledgeable/mature enough to vote, waste of time and money to make this go through, should stay 18
    99% of people in general are too ignorant to make well-informed choices.

    "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." - Winston Churchill

  14. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Daedius View Post
    Teenagers got sheep behaviour, if it's not influenced by their parents it'd be amongst their stupid peers, or a teacher, or whatever.

    i.e. Teens are stupid in the sense they are easily influenced, no matter how ill-informed it may be they'd treat it like Gospel.
    Replace teenagers with humans, pretty sure its always applicable.

  15. #35
    Shrug.

    Honestly they're unlikely to be less informed than the average voter. It's hard to beat that record.

    Quote Originally Posted by Taftvalue View Post
    Children shouldn't be allowed to vote.
    Only become President :P

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Frolk View Post
    99% of 16 year olds are NOT knowledgeable/mature enough to vote, waste of time and money to make this go through, should stay 18
    What percentage of 17 year olds are?
    Quote Originally Posted by Tojara View Post
    Look Batman really isn't an accurate source by any means
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    It is a fact, not just something I made up.

  16. #36
    The Unstoppable Force Ghostpanther's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA, Ohio
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by zorkuus View Post
    Yeah, I bet the conservatives would love more uninformed voters.
    Actually this conservative thinks we should increase the min age to vote to 21.

  17. #37
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Atethecat View Post
    Why would you want to though? If I was in the military, willing to die to defend my country, I would sure as hell like to be given the ability to determine how it runs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Drutt View Post
    16 is old enough to enlist, consent and get married in the UK.

    Denying the right to vote while also saying you have the right to start a family is farcical.
    It's consistent with what we have already with scattered age restrictions.

  18. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffyman View Post
    It's consistent with what we have already with scattered age restrictions.
    Scattered age restrictions aren't a good thing.

  19. #39
    I would be fully in favor of teens getting voting rights early via some kind of test. There are plenty of teens that can make more informed decisions than many adults, so I don't see why not.
    "We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
    -Louis Brandeis

  20. #40
    I really can't imagine looking at the current political scene in the United States or United Kingdom and arriving at the conclusion that one of the problems is that the present group of voters is just too experienced and knowledgeable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •