Last edited by Daedius; 2018-02-16 at 08:51 PM.
I say the US actually has this one right: if you can be drafted, you can vote.
I think that's seventeen. But I'm an American and have been indoctrinated to be poor at other countries, so my bad if that's wrong.
If the Gov think your old enough to fuck and start a family at 16 then you're old enough to vote.
As opposed to us adult, who vote purely from isolated self critical thoughts?
Also, I will note that if you actually engaged them in voting, in their school years, you'd actually have a possibility of explaining all these negatives and influences, instead of waiting for two years to go by and hope that they remembered all those things.
If you give kids the opportunity you'd be surprised at how eager they are to rise to the occasion and feel like they have some semblance of power. It gives them a reason to actually care about politics rather than be apathetic towards it. During the IndyRef 16 year olds were allowed to vote and they took the responsibility pretty seriously. Engaged well, informed themselves. There was a debate on the BBC which showcased it but I can't find a non-bbc link so...
16 is old enough to enlist, consent and get married in the UK.
Denying the right to vote while also saying you have the right to start a family is farcical.
By 18 plenty of "children" are independant; denying a vote to them until this point but expecting them somehow to feel they have a stake in society is a bit backwards, no?
At least by voting at 16 you can tell them "Now you're vested in the future, go make something of it".
I'm not saying that "this means it's a good idea" just that not sides to it are bad (and fuck the idea of paying taxes and not getting to vote until you're 21). I personally didn't get to vote until I was 21 years old, the previous general election falling some few months before my 18th. Raising it to 21 means some people won't get to vote until they are almost 25. Even by lowering it to 16, it won't affect half the population (they'd have been over 18 in time for a general election anyway).
I would be fully in favor of teens getting voting rights early via some kind of test. There are plenty of teens that can make more informed decisions than many adults, so I don't see why not.
"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
-Louis Brandeis
I really can't imagine looking at the current political scene in the United States or United Kingdom and arriving at the conclusion that one of the problems is that the present group of voters is just too experienced and knowledgeable.