Do you have a source for that? @bold
The initiates are training to control the void. Not everyone is able to do that right away.
PC Void elves? You know how many DH PCs exist vs how many there are in actual lore, right?
Do you have a source for that? @bold
The initiates are training to control the void. Not everyone is able to do that right away.
PC Void elves? You know how many DH PCs exist vs how many there are in actual lore, right?
They were mentioned as Freethinkers that came to fight Blood God Hakkar and that they made huge sacrifices to fight him and his minions. You had special quest chain thanks to which you could get plate that gives stenght and intellect.
While I agree that Freethinkers could be dismissed as it doesn't sound like a class, Prelates are obvious enough.
I miss Mists of Pandaria
In my honest opinion I think Blizzard are VERY AWARE of people wanting them as pallys. Again we are all making assumptions based on data mining. If we believe the data mining dark iron dwarfs can be death knights also.
In my opinion we should wait till they make a public announcement on what classes they can be.
Check the wowpedia link and also check out the scenario again.
Lots of death knights exist in lore, thats why there is a class hall for them and tons of npcs. Besides void elves are a race not a class. Now if you were asking how many gnome death knights exist in lore and how many player ones exist then you would be correct in saying player numbers don't equal lore numbers. But there are already more Void Elf NPC's than there were followers of Umbric.
https://wow.gamepedia.com/For_Council_and_King
It was inside one of the items from the Lorewalkers scattered around Pandaria.
- - - Updated - - -
I'll look into the mage/warlock thing but I said Demon Hunters, not Death knights.
Oh lord, give me the strength.
OF COURSE the optimal thing would be:
-different class name
-different skill names and icons
-different animations for skills/spells
-different game mechanics
since I’m not THAT stupid and I understand all of these would be way too much work for Blizzard, I can be happy enough with a name change for the class.
As much as I’m a Rogue and not a “naked warrior with knives” or a Priest and not an “Holy Mage” I would like to be a Sunsomething instead of a Paladin.
Why is it so difficult to understand its a mistery to me.
Else
There aren't *that* many. Most of the people who trained to become a demon hunter died in the process. That, along with the fact that 100% of them were imprisoned after the events of black temple and a fair amount of them died escaping the vault of the wardens.
I saw this and I see why some could come to the conclusion. I just think it's weird that new void elves are told to "go adventure out into the world" and experience yada yada as if the playable void elves are the ones that were in the rift with Umbric for the past.. who knows how long. I think this all circles back to the fact that void elves shouldn't be a race :/ They're a bonafide hero class with a race label because blizzard didn't want to design an entire new class.As Umbric's original group of followers was not shown to be particularly large -- and comprised entirely of mages and warlocks in the scenario -- players have speculated that the void elves' ranks, which seem to have grown significantly between the recruitment scenario and the introduction quest for void elf characters, were expanded by elves learning of Telogrus in the interim and willingly subjecting themselves to the process. This is seemingly implied by the presence of blood and high elf initiates training under Locus-Walker in the rift, but not explicitly stated.
If we're going with the theory that void elves are other classes and what not becoming interested in void magic it makes no sense that they start at level 20 instead of like.. 100/110 because they should've already have experienced everything that's gone on in recent times because they weren't away from Azeroth.
Really both void elves and light forged shouldn't be playable races or like you said should start out at 100/110 because both already are a warrior/mage/whatever that undergoes a transformation. Blizzard did well creating lore for Nightborne and Highmountain and I assume they just ran out of time and was like "fuck it lets just make up some stuff quick for the Alliance". And because these are transformation races and not actual ones it means they should also have any class the base race has as well.
What Blizzard should have done was make a couple allied races for the Army of Light that now need a home since the major players in the legion are gone and have them join the Alliance and just give a couple light forged styles to Draenei when orcs get the upright standing option.
Having a few races in the Army of the Light would have made Argus seem less silly then what we got.
This thread is ridiculous, Zandalari Paladins already exist ingame, anyone saying otherwise is just a troll. >.>
You know what does not exist? Dark Iron Shamans. In fact Dwarf shamans were not a thing at all until Cataclysm.
really? did you forgot there was a whole place called blackrock mountain, and the searing gorge and burnning steppes FILLED with dark iron shaman controlling elementals?
almost like the dark iron themselves are the ones who summoned the firelord ragnaros originally?
http://wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/Shaman...dwarven_shaman
The spellcasters of the Dark Iron dwarves are usually mages or shaman, as these deal closely with fire.[7] (MG 52)
http://wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/Dark_Iron_dwarves
Dark Iron dwarves speak Common and Dwarven. Dark Iron dwarves sometimes learn Goblin and Low Common to speak with the creatures around their territory, and their elemental masters teach some of them their ancient language, Kalimag
etc
Last edited by FelPlague; 2018-02-20 at 07:51 PM.